Advertisement

Thermo-mechanical simulations of selective laser melting for AlSi10Mg alloy to predict the part-scale deformations

  • Emrecan SoylemezEmail author
  • Ebubekir Koç
  • Mert Coşkun
Full Research Article

Abstract

Selective laser melting (SLM) is one of the most frequently employed metal additive manufacturing methods. Various industries such as aerospace, automotive, biomedical, and tooling utilize SLM parts. Although it has a wide scope of applications, it demands a thorough understanding to supply reliable parts. Thus, process simulations are key methods to optimize the process and to shorten the product development time. SLM allows manufacturing of steel, nickel, cobalt, chromium, titanium, and aluminum alloy parts. Aluminum alloys are one of the most common materials processed in the manufacturing industry, and AlSi10Mg is one of the SLM-compatible alloys which requires further understanding. This study focuses on AlSi10Mg alloy SLM simulations to predict the part deformations accurately. The proposed material properties of cast AlSi10Mg alloy simulations closely agreed with the experimental results, and this specific model is expected to aid design engineers to fabricate their parts with better consistency.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Laser sintering Metal additive manufacturing Thermo-mechanical modeling Finite element analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Evren Arin and Sualp Ozel from Autodesk® who made the use of Autodesk Netfabb Local Simulation 2018.2 possible for the authors. The authors also sincerely thank Michael Gouge and Sualp Ozel for their guidance on the Netfabb Simulation practices. In addition, the authors would like to thank Mark Pellowe and Ian McNaught for their helpful feedback on the paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) through Project No: 216M033.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wohlers T (2017) Wohlers report 2017: 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry: annual worldwide progress report. Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eustis S (2017) Metallurgy Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide 2017 - 2023Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive Manufacturing Technologies 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital ManufacturingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A (2015) An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Addit Manuf 8:36–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gault, Rosemary S (2010) RAPOLAC (Rapid production of large aerospace components). Sheffield, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ocylok S, Leichnitz M, Thieme S, Nowotny S (2016) Investigations on laser metal deposition of stainless steel 316L with coaxial wire feeding. In: Lane. pp 1–4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baufeld B, Brandl E, Van Der Biest O (2011) Wire based additive layer manufacturing: comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4 V components fabricated by laser-beam deposition and shaped metal deposition. J Mater Process Technol 211:1146–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gockel J, Beuth J, Taminger K (2014) Integrated control of solidification microstructure and melt pool dimensions in electron beam wire feed additive manufacturing of ti-6al-4v. Addit Manuf 1:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koutny D (2014) Modern Methods of Construction Design.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05203-8 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moylan S, Slotwinski J, Cooke A et al (2013) Lessons learned in establishing the NIST metal additive manufacturing laboratory. NIST Pub Series: Technical Note (NIST TN).  https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.tn.1801
  11. 11.
    Beuth J, Fox J, Gockel J et al (2013) Process mapping for qualification across multiple direct metal additive manufacturing processes jack. Proc Solid Free Fabr Symp.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mertens R, Clijsters S, Kempen K, Kruth J-P (2014) Optimization of scan strategies in selective laser melting of aluminum parts with downfacing areas. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:061012.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slotwinski JA, Garboczi EJ, Stutzman PE et al (2014) Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 119:460.  https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meier C, Penny RW, Zou Y et al (2017) Thermophysical Phenomena in Metal Additive Manufacturing by Selective Laser Melting: Fundamentals, Modeling, Simulation and Experimentation. www.arxiv.org
  15. 15.
    Megahed M, Mindt H-W, N’Dri N et al (2016) Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 5:4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0047-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patterson AE, Messimer SL, Farrington PA (2017) Overhanging features and the SLM/DMLS residual stresses problem: review and future research need. Technologies 5:15.  https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies5020015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mercelis P, Kruth J (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12:254–265.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shiomi M, Osakada K, Nakamura K et al (2004) Residual stress within metallic model made by selective laser melting process. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 53:195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60677-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Palmer TA (2015) Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys. J Mater Process Technol 215:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunbar AJ, Denlinger ER, Heigel J et al (2016) Development of experimental method for in situ distortion and temperature measurements during the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 12:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buchbinder D, Meiners W, Pirch N et al (2014) Investigation on reducing distortion by preheating during manufacture of aluminum components using selective laser melting. J Laser Appl 26:012004.  https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4828755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aggarangsi P, Beuth JL (2006) Localized preheating approaches for reducing residual stress in additive manufacturing. In: Proc SFF Symp. Austin, pp 709–720Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bandyopadhyay A, Traxel KD (2018) Invited review article: Metal-additive manufacturing—Modeling strategies for application-optimized designs. Addit Manuf 22:758–774.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    King W, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM et al (2015) Overview of modelling and simulation of metal powder bed fusion process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Mater Sci Technol 31:957–968.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soylemez E, Beuth JL, Taminger K (2010) Controlling melt pool dimensions over a wide range of material deposition rates in electron beam additive manufacturing. In: 21st annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference, SFF 2010. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium at Austin, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kundakcioglu E, Lazoglu I, Rawal S (2015) Transient thermal modeling of laser-based additive manufacturing for 3D freeform structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7932-2 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jamshidinia M, Kong F, Kovacevic R (2013) Numerical modeling of heat distribution in the electron beam melting ® of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 135:061010.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD (2016) Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf 12:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R (2013) Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting. Mater Des 52:638–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li C, Liu JF, Fang XY, Guo YB (2017) Efficient predictive model of part distortion and residual stress in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 17:157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Papadakis L, Loizou A, Risse J, Schrage J (2014) Numerical computation of component shape distortion manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Procedia CIRP 18:90–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zaeh MF, Branner G (2010) Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting. Prod Eng 4:35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peng H, Go DB, Billo R et al (2016) Part-scale model for fast prediction of thermal distortion in DMLS additive manufacturing; Part 1: a thermal cicuit network model. In: Proc 27th annu int solid free fabr symp. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium at Austin, Texas, USA, pp 361–381Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dunbar AJ, Denlinger ER, Gouge MF, Michaleris P (2016) Experimental validation of finite element modeling for laser powder bed fusion deformation. Addit Manuf 12:108–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Afazov S, Denmark WAD, Lazaro Toralles B et al (2017) Distortion prediction and compensation in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 17:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Denlinger ER, Irwin J, Michaleris P (2014) Thermomechanical modeling of additive manufacturing large parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:061007.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Woodward R (2001) Aluminium and Aluminium Alloys —DesignationsGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rambabu P, Prasad NE, Kutumbarao VV, Wanhill RJH (2017) Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Buchbinder D, Schleifenbaum H, Heidrich S et al (2011) High power Selective Laser Melting (HP SLM) of aluminum parts. Phys Procedia 12:271–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li Y, Gu D (2014) Parametric analysis of thermal behavior during selective laser melting additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy powder. Mater Des 63:856–867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hu H, Ding X, Wang L (2016) Numerical analysis of heat transfer during multi-layer selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg. Optik (Stuttg) 127:8883–8891.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.06.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khan HM, Dirikolu MH, Koç E, Oter ZC (2018) Numerical Investigation of heat current study across different platforms in SLM processed multi-layer AlSi10Mg. Optik (Stuttg) 170:82–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.05.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu S, Zhu H, Peng G et al (2018) Microstructure prediction of selective laser melting AlSi10Mg using finite element analysis. Mater Des 142:319–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu J, Wang L, An X (2017) Numerical analysis of residual stress evolution of AlSi10Mg manufactured by selective laser melting. Optik (Stuttg) 137:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.02.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Promoppatum P, Onler R, Yao SC (2017) Numerical and experimental investigations of micro and macro characteristics of direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4 V products. J Mater Process Technol 240:262–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kempen K, Thijs L, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth JP (2012) Mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg produced by selective laser melting. Phys Procedia 39:439–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hofer P, Kaschnitz E (2011) Thermal diffusivity of the aluminium alloy Al-10Si-Mn-Mg (Silafont 36) in the solid and liquid states. High Temp Press 4:311–323Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Valencia JJ, Quested PN (2008) Thermophysical properties. ASM Handb Cast 15:468–481.  https://doi.org/10.1361/asmhba0005240 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferguson JB, Lopez H, Cho K, Kim C-S (2016) Temperature effects on the tensile properties of precipitation-hardened Al-Mg-Cu-Si alloys. Metals (Basel) 6:43.  https://doi.org/10.3390/met6030043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Boley CD, Mitchell SC, Rubenchik AM, Wu SSQ (2016) Metal powder absorptivity: modeling and experiment. Appl Opt 55:6496–6500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gusarov AV (2010) Radiation transfer in metallic-powder beds during laser forming. Quantum Electron 40:451.  https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2010v040n05ABEH013976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yuri C (2011) Investigations of light transfer in powder bed. Phys Procedia 12:279–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.036
  53. 53.
    Trapp J, Rubenchik AM, Guss G, Matthews MJ (2017) In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 9:341–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bass L, Milner J, Gnäupel-Herold T, Moylan S (2018) Residual stress in additive manufactured nickel alloy 625 parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 140:061004.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Oden JT (1969) Finite element analysis of nonlinear problems in the dynamical theory of coupled thermoelasticity. Nucl Eng Des 10:465–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(69)90082-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hibbitt HD, Marcal PV (1973) A numerical, thermo-mechanical model for the welding and subsequent loading of a fabricated structure. Comput Struct 3:1145–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(73)90043-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Simo JC, Taylor RL (1985) Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 48:101–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-2 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peng H, Ghasri-Khouzani M, Gong S et al (2018) Fast prediction of thermal distortion in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Part 2, a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model. Addit Manuf 22:869–882.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gouge M, Michaleris P (2018) Thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Denlinger ER, Gouge M, Irwin J, Michaleris P (2017) Thermomechanical model development and in situ experimental validation of the Laser Powder-Bed Fusion process. Addit Manuf 16:73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15:299–305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02667333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Soylemez E (2018) Modeling the Melt Pool of the Laser Sintered Ti6Al4 V Layers with Goldak’s Double-Ellipsoidal Heat Source. In: Proceedings of 29th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Austin, pp 1721–1736Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Anthony TR, Cline HE (1977) Surface rippling induced by surface-tension gradients during laser surface melting and alloying. J Appl Phys 48:3888–3894.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.324260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zhao C, Fezzaa K, Cunningham RW et al (2017) Real-time monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process using high-speed X-ray imaging and diffraction. Sci Rep 7:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03761-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringFatih Sultan Mehmet UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Fatih Sultan Mehmet UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations