Effect of Firing Temperature and Duration on Fused Silica Investment Shell Strength at Room Temperature

  • Mingzhi XuEmail author
  • Jingjing Qing


Fused silica is widely used in investment casting shell molds as flour, stucco and binder for its superior properties, such as low linear thermal expansion coefficient and high thermal shock resistance. Investment shell molds are usually fired after the de-wax process to remove the residue pattern material, and to improve shell strength through sintering. The firing temperatures are generally high enough to affect the phase constituent and microstructure of the shells, which further influences the shell strength. Firing duration at firing temperature is another important factor having an impact on the shell strength due to grain coarsening, but it is often overlooked by investment foundries. In this article, the room temperature moduli of rupture of investment shells fired at different conditions were determined. The crystallinity of fused silica shells was determined using X-ray diffraction. The differences on the shell strength were discussed and correlated with the microstructure and phase constitution in the shells after different firing processes.


investment shell firing temperature firing duration modulus of rupture phase transformation 



The authors would like to thank American Foundry Society for funding this project. The suggestion and input from the AFS investment casting technical committee and project steering committee are much appreciated. Joe Govro, Madison Wooly, Scott Vogel and Wayne Pugh are acknowledged for the assistance with sample preparation and testing.


  1. 1.
    S. Jones, C. Yuan, Advances in shell moulding for investment casting. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 135(2–3), 258–265 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.S. Sabau, Shrinkage prediction for the investment casting of stainless steels. Trans. Am. Foundry Soc. 115(07–042), 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.S. Sabau, S. Viswanathan, Thermophysical properties of zircon and fused silica-based shells for investment casting. Radiat. Eff. 81(4), 1–13 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Nastac, M.N. Gungor, I. Ucok, K.L. Klug, W.T. Tack, Advances in investment casting of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: a review. Int. J. Cast Metals Res. 19(2), 73–93 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Tumurugoti, Effects of Material Variables and Process Parameters on Properties of Investment Casting Shells (Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, 2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Richards, M. Xu, S. Lekakh, Impact of firing temperature on phase transformations and properties of silica-based investment shell molds, in Transactions of American Foundry Society (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Xu, A comprehensive study of thermo-physical properties of investment shells, in Investment Casting Institute 64th Technical Conference and Equipment Expo (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Xu, Characterization of investment shell thermal properties. Doctoral dissertations. 2423, 2015.
  9. 9.
    S. Beals, M.D. Zerfoss, Volume change attending low-to-high inversion of cristobalite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 27(10), 285–292 (1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Xu, H. Li, K. Chandrashekhara, S. Lekakh, V. Richards, Thermo-mechanical properties of SLA pattern materials and their effect on stress in investment shell molds, in Transactions of American Foundry Society (2013), pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Xu, S.N. Lekakh, V.L. Richards, Thermal property database for investment casting shells. Int. J. Metalcasting 10(3), 329–337 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM International, Standard test method for flexural strength of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. ASTM Int. ASTM Standards, Designation: C1161-13, pp. 1–19 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Hart, The nomenclature of silica. Am. Mineral. 12, 383–395 (1927)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.W. Rice, Ceramic tensile strength-grain size relations: grain sizes, slopes, and branch intersections. J. Mater. Sci. 32(7), 1673–1692 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Foundry Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations