Advertisement

International Journal of Metalcasting

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 26–46 | Cite as

Identifying Cast Iron Microstructure Variation Using Acoustic Resonance Techniques

  • Siddhartha BiswasEmail author
  • Charles Monroe
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Cast iron foundries have historically utilized ultrasonic methods to determine nodularity levels in ductile iron parts. The foundries have begun to search for an alternative that would provide a test of the whole part, while eliminating part preparation, consumables, rust and plating issues and safety hazards. Progress has been made in the application and performance evaluation of resonant acoustic method as an alternative tool for detecting unacceptable levels of nodularity in ductile iron. This paper covers other aspects of cast iron microstructure, namely graphite shape, graphite size and matrix microstructure. To identify cast iron microstructure variation within a thick section, samples from different locations of a thick section (2″) were studied. Finally, a preliminary study of effect of having casting skin on resonant frequency was also conducted. Step block castings were produced with above-mentioned variables. Rectangular samples for resonant inspection were machined. The cast iron samples were excited by a calibrated hammer, and the resonant frequencies (RF) were recorded with an accelerometer. The RF measurements were normalized to eliminate weight change affect. Finite element analysis (FEA) was done to show the minimum level of shift in RF due to dimensional variability. The design of experiment analysis showed that the variations in graphite shape and matrix microstructure are identifiable. The graphite size variation due to section sizes is detectable to a certain extent, i.e., variation between 5/8″ and 1″. However, the result obtained in this study does not support the use of resonant frequency shift to identify samples from section sizes 1″, 2″ and 4″. The RF response showed that the samples with surface condition (presence of skin) variation can be identified for a known graphite shape.

Keywords

nondestructive testing cast iron microstructure resonant frequency 

References

  1. 1.
    “50th Census of World Casting Production” Modern Casting 106.12 (2016), pp. 25–29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.R. Davis, ASM Specialty Handbook: Cast Irons (ASM international, Russell, 1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Microstructure-and-Porosity-Control, one-page-technology-descriptions, SinterCast (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.W. Monroe, C.E. Bates, Some thermal and mechanical properties of compacted graphite iron. Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc. 90, 615–624 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Rytter, Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, 1993Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Dick, NDT in the Foundry (American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, 1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Modal Shop, Comparison of Non-Destructive Methods (2017), http://www.modalshop.com/ndt/Comparison-of-Non-Destructive-Methods?ID=256. Accessed 29 May 2017
  8. 8.
    T. Jennings, Bellfounding (Shire Publications, Princes Risborough, 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.P. Shull, Nondestructive Evaluation: Theory, Techniques, and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Bishop, G. Gladwell, An investigation into the theory of resonance testing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 255(1055), 241–280 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K.G. McConnell, P.S. Varoto, Vibration testing: Theory and Practice (Wiley, New York, 2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.J. Emerson, W. Simmons, Final report on the evaluation of the graphite form in ferritic ductile iron by ultrasonic and sonic testing, and the effect of graphite form on mechanical properties. Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc. 84, 109–128 (1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.G. Fuller, Evaluation of the graphite form in pearlitic ductile iron by ultrasonic and sonic testing and the effect of graphite form on mechanical properties, Transactions American Foundrymen’s Society, 1977 AFS Research Reports (1978), pp. 133–150Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.G. Fuller, P.J. Emerson, G.F. Sergeant, A report on the effect upon mechanical properties of variation in graphite form in irons having varying amounts of ferrite and pearlite in the matrix structure and the use of nondestructive tests in the assessments of mechanical properties of such irons. Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc. 84, 21–50 (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Plenard, Cast iron damping capacity, structure and property relations, in Congress Papers, 29th International Foundry Congress and Exposition, Detroit, American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, vol. 111 (1962)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.D. Adams, N.D. Vaughan, Resonance testing of cast iron. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2(1), 65–74 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.A. Golovin, On the damping capacity of cast irons. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 113(7), 716–720 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.W. Bono, G.R. Stultz, Resonant inspection applied to 100% testing of nodularity of cast ductile iron (No. 2008-01-2577). SAE Technical Paper (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.N. Damir, A. Elkhatib, G. Nassef, Prediction of fatigue life using modal analysis for grey and ductile cast iron. Int. J. Fatigue 29(3), 499–507 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V.B. Kovacs, G.S. Cole, Interaction of acoustic waves with SG (spheroidal-graphite) iron castings, in Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on the Metallurgy of Cast Iron (1976), pp. 827–840Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Białobrzeski, Sonic testing in assessment of casting quality. Arch. Foundry Eng. 8(1), 13–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F. Mampaey, Acoustic resonance analysis for examining the graphite shape in cast iron. Trans. Am. Foundry Soc. 115, 647–663 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.M. Song, S.C. Lin, T.S. Lui, L.H. Chen, Y.H. Song, Effects of matrix structure on the resonant vibration behavior of spheroidal graphite cast iron. Mater. Trans. 45(4), 1379–1382 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. Beeley, Foundry Technology (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2001), p. 506Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Biswas, Acoustic Resonance Response of Cast Iron, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2017Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.R. Davis, ASM Specialty Handbook: Cast Irons (Russell, ASM International, 1996), p. 362Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ASTM E10, 2017, Standard Test Method for Brinell Hardness of Metallic Materials, American Society of Testing and MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B.R. Patterson, C.E. Bates, Nondestructive property prediction in gray cast iron using ultrasonic techniques. Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc. 89, 369–378 (1981)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Li, R.D. Griffin, C.E. Bates, Gray iron property measurements using ultrasonic techniques. Trans. Am. Foundry Soc. 125, 05 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Fowler, D.M. Stefanescu, T. Prucha, Production of ferritic and pearlitic grades of compacted graphite cast iron by the in-mold process. Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc. 92, 361–372 (1984)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Modal Shop, Inc., Model NDT-TS1 Test Station (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    MATLAB® (2016a) Academic Research, the MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ANSYS® Workbench Academic Research, Release 18, ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    CES Edupack 2016 (Granta Design Limited, 2016), Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Foundry Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Science and EngineeringThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations