Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 603–622 | Cite as

Socio-economic Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural West Bengal: A Household Level Analysis

  • Poulomi RoyEmail author
  • Soma Ray
  • Sushil Kumar Haldar
Original Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

The present study tries to estimate the incidence, depth and severity of multidimensional poverty (MDP) along with the contributions of dimensions to MDP among the rural households using multi-stage random sampling method in West Bengal. We decompose the inequality of deprivation scores between and within different socio-economic, religious and ethnic groups. The factors affecting the probability of falling in multidimensional poverty is also explored here using logistic regression, and the regression results suggest that public infrastructure plays an essential role towards explaining the variations of MDP. The present study is expected to be helpful to the development planners for better understanding of the root causes of MDP among the rural households in West Bengal.

Keywords

Multidimensional poverty Inequality decomposition FGT Index Theil Index 

JEL Classification

I30 I32 D63 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Centre for Advanced Studies, Department of Economics, Jadavpur University for Funding the Project entitled ‘Incidence, Depth, Severity and Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty among Different Socio-Ethnic Groups: A Case Study of Selected Districts of Rural West Bengal’.

References

  1. Alkire, Sabina, and James Foster. 2009. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. OPHI working paper 32. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Alkire, Sabina., and James Foster. 2010. Designing the Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index. OPHI Working Paper 37. UK: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Alkire, Sabina, and Maria Emma Santos. 2010. Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. OPHI working papers 38. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Alkire, Sabina. 2002. Valuing freedoms—Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction, Indian edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alkire, Sabina. 2007. Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and the multidimensional poverty (August). Working paper 88. Chronic Poverty Research Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Bardhan, Pranab Kumar, and Thirukodikaval Nilakanta Srinivasan, 1974. Poverty and income distribution in India, Statistical Publishing Society, Calcutta.Google Scholar
  7. Chandy, Laurence and Homi Kharas. 2014. What do new price data mean for the goal of ending extreme poverty? https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2014/05/05/what-do-new-price-data-mean-for-the-goal-of-ending-extreme-poverty/. Accessed Sept 2017.
  8. Cowell, Frank Alan., and Stephen P. Jenkins. 1995. How much inequality can we explain? A methodology and an application to the United States. The Economic Journal 105 (429): 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dandekar, Vinayak Mahadeo, and N. Rath. 1971. Poverty in India. Economic and Political Weekly 6 (2): 1–27.Google Scholar
  10. Deaton, Angus. 1997. The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/593871468777303124/The-analysis-of-household-surveys-a-microeconometric-approach-to-development-policy. Accessed Sept 2017.
  11. Duncan, Greg J., and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, (eds.). 1997. Consequences of growing up poor, 55–71. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.russellsage.org/publications/consequences-growing-poor-1. Accessed Sept 2017.
  12. Foster, James Eric. 1984. On economic poverty: A survey of aggregate measures. Advances in Econometrics 3: 215-251.Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs, Victor Robert. 1967. Redefining poverty and redistributing income, national affairs. The Public Interest 8(5): 88–95. https://www.nationalaffairs.com/storage/app/uploads/public/58e/1a4/a48/58e1a4a48f37d449037283.pdf. Accessed Sept 2017.
  14. Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric analysis , 4th ed. London: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Kamdar, Sangita, and Asoke Basak. 2005. Beyond the human development index: Preliminary notes on deprivation and inequality. Economic and Political Weekly 30 (34): 3759–3765.Google Scholar
  16. Krishnaji, N. 1997. Human poverty index: A critique. Economic and Political Weekly. 32 (35): 2202–2205.Google Scholar
  17. Litchfield, Julie A. 1999. Inequality: Methods and tools. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  18. Meenakshi, J.V., Ranjan Ray, and Souvik Gupta. 2000. Estimates of poverty for SC, ST, and female-headed households. Economic and Political Weekly 35 (31): 2748–2754.Google Scholar
  19. Narayan, Deepa, Raj Patel, Kai Schafft, Anne Rademacher, and Sarah Koch-Schulte. 2000. Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us?. New York: World Bank/Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. 2017. Global MPI. 2017. http://www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/global-mpi-2017/. Accessed Sept 2017.
  21. Panagariya, Arvind, and Megha Mukim. 2013. A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty in India. Policy Research Working Paper 6714. World BankGoogle Scholar
  22. Panagariya, Arvind. 2008. India: The emerging giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ranis, Gustav, Frances Stewart, and Alejandro Ramirez. 2000. Economic growth and human development. World Development 28 (2): 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rao, Vijayendra Kasturi Ranga Varadaraja. 1977. Nutritional norms by calorie intake and measurement of poverty. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. 47 (1): 645–654.Google Scholar
  25. Rippin, Nicole. 2009. The concept of multidimensional poverty: Accounting for dimensional poverty. Discussion paper no. 179:127, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  26. Rowntree, Benjamin Seebohm. 1901. Poverty: A study of town life. Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Roy, Kajari, and Sushil Kumar Haldar. 2010. Measuring poverty and socio-economic deprivation inequalities in India at the sub-national level. Asia Pacific Social Science Review 10 (1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen, Amartya Kumar, and Sudhir Anand. 1997. Concept of human development and poverty: A multidimensional perspective. In Poverty and human development papers 1997. 1–20, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  29. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1997a. From income inequality to economic inequality. Southern Economic Journal 64 (2): 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1981. Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1983. Accounts, actions, and values: Objectivity of social science. In Social theory and political practice, ed. Chris Lloyd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  33. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1990. Development as capability expansion. In Human development and the international development strategy, ed. K. Griffin and J. Knight. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  34. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1997. Poverty in the human development perspective: Concept and measurement. In Human development report 1997, 15–23. UNDP.Google Scholar
  36. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Streeten, Paul. 1994. Human development means and ends. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 84 (2): 85–97.Google Scholar
  38. Sukhatme, Pandurang Vasudeo, and Paresh Narain.1983. Intra-individual variation in energy requirements and its implication. Indian Journal of Medical Research 78: 857–65Google Scholar
  39. Sukhatme, Pandurang Vasudeo 1981. On measurement of poverty. Economic and Political Weekly 16 (32): 1318–1324.Google Scholar
  40. Thorat, Sukhadeo. 2006. Paying the social debt. Economic & Political Weekly 41(24): 2432–2435.Google Scholar
  41. Thorat, Sukhadeo, and Amaresh Dubey. 2012. Has growth been socially inclusive during 1993- 94–2009-10? Economic Political Weekly, 47(10): 43-54.Google Scholar
  42. Townsend, Peter. 1974. Poverty as relative deprivation: Resources and style of living. In Poverty, inequality and class structure, ed. D. Wedderburn, 15–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations Development Programme and Government of India. 2004. West Bengal human development report. 2004. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/west-bengal-human-development-report-2004. Accessed sept 2017.
  44. United Nations Development Programme. 1996. Human development report 1996. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-1996. Accessed Sept 2017.
  45. United Nations Development Programme. 1997. Human development report 1997. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-1997. Accessed Sept 2017.
  46. United Nations Development Programme. 1998. Human development report 1998. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-1998. Accessed Sept 2017.
  47. World Bank. 2002. World development report 2002. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/228361468140407049/pdf/multi0page.pdf. Accessed Sept 2017.

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations