Advertisement

Glass Structures & Engineering

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 421–432 | Cite as

Post-breakage in-plane stiffness of laminated glass: an engineering approach

  • Gianmaria D’Ambrosio
  • Laura GaluppiEmail author
  • Gianni Royer-Carfagni
SI: Glass Performance Paper

Abstract

In the post-breakage phase, laminated glass (LG) can maintain a residual load-bearing capacity due to the tension stiffening of the polymer through the adhesion with the shards, but the determination of the overall post-breakage stiffness presents formidable difficulties. A simple model is here proposed for the in-plane response of broken thermally treated LG, characterized by a fine cracking pattern. A simple formula for the effective post-breakage stiffness under in-plane loading is provided, which depends upon interlayer modulus and amount of delamination. Comparisons with numerical experiments confirm its accuracy for interpreting the response of representative portions of broken LG, composed by a large number of glass fragments, for different shapes of the glass shards and for different amount of delamination. The proposed model may represent an useful practical tool for evaluating the post-critical response of LG under in-plane loading, in particular under shear. This may be of crucial importance in view of possible applications of LG-based elements as structural shear-resistant transparent diaphragms for the seismic retrofitting of historical monuments. Glass-based bracings shall be designed to remain sound under moderate earthquakes; they can possibly break under the most severe seismic events, but always in a ductile manner while dissipating energy, thanks to the hysteretic response of broken LG consequent to progressive delamination.

Keywords

Laminated glass Post-glass-breakage response In-plane loading Effective stiffness Seismic retrofitting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Italian Dipartimento della Protezione Civile under Project ReLUIS-DPC 2019–2021 and the support of the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca under Grant MIUR-PRIN voce COAN 5.50.16.01 code 2015JW9NJT.

Funding

This study was funded by Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri—Italy and Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca—Italy (MIUR-PRIN voce COAN 5.50.16.01 code 2015JW9NJT).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ABAQUS. Analysis users manual, version 6.10. Simulia (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Amadio, C., Bedon, C.: Effect of circumferential sealant joints and metal supporting frames on the buckling behavior of glass panels subjected to in-plane shear loads. Glass Struct Eng 1(2), 353–373 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambartsumyan, S.A.: Elasticity Theory of Different Moduli (Trans. RF Wu and YZ Zhang). China Railway, Beijing (1986)Google Scholar
  4. Barou, L., Oikonomopoulou, F., Bristogianni, T., Veer, F., Nijsse, R.: Structural glass: a new remedial tool for the consolidation of historic structures. Heron 63(1–2), 159–197 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. Bedon, C., Amadio, C.: Buckling of flat laminated glass panels under in-plane compression or shear. Eng Struct 36, 185–197 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedon, C., Amadio, C.: Exploratory finite-element investigation and assessment of standardized design buckling criteria for two-side linear adhesively supported glass panels under in-plane shear loads. Eng Struct 106, 273–287 (2016a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedon, C., Amadio, C.: Shear glass panels with point-fixed mechanical connections: finite-element numerical investigation and buckling design recommendations. Eng Struct 112, 233–244 (2016b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bedon, C., Amadio, C.: Numerical assessment of vibration control systems for multi-hazard design and mitigation of glass curtain walls. J Build Eng 15, 1–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behr, R.A., Minor, J.E., Norville, H.S.: Structural behavior of architectural laminated glass. J Struct Eng 119, 202–222 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belis, J., Depauw, J., Callewaert, D., Delincé, D., Van Impe, R.: Failure mechanisms and residual capacity of annealed glass/SGP laminated beams at room temperature. Eng Fail Anal 16(6), 1866–1875 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biolzi, L., Orlando, M., Piscitelli, L.R., Spinelli, P.: Static and dynamic response of progressively damaged ionoplast laminated glass beams. Compos Struct 157, 337–347 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butchart, C., Overend, M.: Delamination in fractured laminated glass. In: Proceedings of Engineered Transparency International Conference at Glasstec, Düsseldorf (Germany), pp. 249–257 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. CEN/TC 250. prCEN/TS xxxx:2018—structural glass—design and construction rules (2018)Google Scholar
  14. Cerezo Miguel, J., Núñez Díaz, M.A., Lauret Aguirregabiria, B.: Different behaviors in laminated glass beams with perpendicular directions of laminated. In: Proceedings of Glass Performance Days, Tampere (Finland), pp. 226–228 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Chen, S., Zang, M., Wang, D., Yoshimura, S., Yamada, T.: Numerical analysis of impact failure of automotive laminated glass: a review. Compos Part B Eng 122, 47–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cruz, P.J.S., Pequeno, J., Lebet, J.-P.: Mocibob, D: Mechanical modelling of in-plane loaded glass panes. In: Challenging Glass Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 309–318 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. D’Ambrosio, G., Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A simple model for the post-breakage response of laminated glass under in-plane loading. Comp Struct, under review (2019) Google Scholar
  18. Del Linz, P., Hooper, P.A., Arora, H., Wang, Y., Smith, D., Blackman, B.R.K., Dear, J.P.: Delamination properties of laminated glass windows subject to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 105, 39–53 (2017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Englhardt, O., Luible, A., Mocibob, D., Reich, S., Bedon, C., Belis, J.: Stability of glass elements—TG12 final report. pp. 661–669 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. Feirabend, S., Sobek, W.: Bewehrtes verbundsicherheitsglas. Stahlbau 77(S1), 16–22 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldman, M., Kasper, R., Abeln, B., Gessler, A., Langoshc, K., Beyer, J., Schneider, J., Schula, S., Siebert, G., Haese, A., et al.: JRC Scientific and Policy Report. Guidance for European Structural Design of Glass Components. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2014)Google Scholar
  22. Ferretti, D., Rossi, M., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Through cracked tensile delamination tests with photoelastic measurements. In: Proceedings of Challenging Glass 3, Delft (Netherlands), pp. 641–652 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. Freddi, F., Royer-Carfagni, G., Silvestri, M.: Full-scale experiments for point-fixing frameless laminated glass. Int J Appl Glass Sci 1(3), 257–272 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Effective thickness of laminated glass beams. New expression via a variational approach. Eng Struct 38, 53–67 (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Laminated beams with viscoelastic interlayer. Int J Solids Struct 49, 2637–2645 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A homogenized model for the post-breakage tensile behavior of laminated glass. Compos Struct 154, 600–615 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A homogenized analysis à la Hashin for cracked laminates under equi-biaxial stress. Applications to laminated glass. Compos Part B Eng 111, 332–347 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: The post-breakage response of laminated heat-treated glass under in plane and out of plane loading. Compos Part B Eng 147, 227–239 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. He, X-t, Zheng, Z-l, Sun, J-y, Li, Y-m, Chen, S-l: Convergence analysis of a finite element method based on different moduli in tension and compression. Int J Solids Struct 46(20), 3734–3740 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huveners, E.: Circumferentially adhesive bonded glass panes for bracing steel frames in façades. Ph.D. thesis, TU Eindhoven (NL) (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Keller, U., Mortelmans, H.: Adhesion in laminated safety glass–what makes it work. In: Proceedings of Glass Processing Days, Tampere (Finland), pp. 13–16 (1999)Google Scholar
  32. Kott, A., Vogel, T.: Safety of laminated glass structures after initial failure. Struct Eng Int IABSE 14(2), 134–138 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuntsche, J., Schneider, J.: Mechanical behaviour of polymer interlayers in explosion resistant glazing. In: Proceedings of Challenging Glass 4 and Cost 414 Action TU0905 Final Conference, Lausanne (Switzerland), pp. 447–454 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Look, D.W., Wong, T., Augustus, S.R.: The Seismic Retrofit of Historic Buildings Keeping Preservation in the Forefront. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington (1997)Google Scholar
  35. Louter, C., Belis, J., Bos, F., Veer, F.: Reinforced glass beams composed of annealed, heat-strengthened and fully tempered glass. In: Challenging Glass 3: Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, CGC 2012, pp. 691–702 (2012a)Google Scholar
  36. Louter, C., Belis, J., Veer, F., Lebet, J.P.: Durability of SG-laminated reinforced glass beams: effects of temperature, thermal cycling, humidity and load-duration. Constr Build Mater 27(1), 280–292 (2012b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mocibob, D.: Glass panel under shear loading—use of glass envelopes in building stabilization. Ph.D. thesis, EPFL, Lausanne (CH) (2008)Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council (Italy): Advisory Committee on Technical Recommendations for Construction. CNR-DT 210: Guide for the Design, Construction and Control of Buildings with Structural Glass Elements (2013)Google Scholar
  39. Nhamoinesu, S., Overend, M.: Simple models for predicting the post-fracture behaviour of laminated glass. In: Proceedings of the XXV A.T.I.V 2010 International Conference, Parma (Italy), pp. 249–257 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. Pelfrene, J., Van Dam, S., Van Paepegem, W.: Numerical analysis of the peel test for characterisation of interfacial debonding in laminated glass. Int J Adhes Adhes 62, 146–153 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stepinac, M., Rajčić, V., Žarnić, R.: Timber-structural glass composite systems in earthquake environment. Gradjevinar 68, 211–219 (2016)Google Scholar
  42. Wu, J., Yan, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, H.W.: A stabilized complementarity formulation for nonlinear analysis of 3d bimodular materials. Acta Mech Sin 32(3), 481–490 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly
  2. 2.Construction Technologies Institute - Italian National Research Council (ITC-CNR)San Giuliano Milanese, MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations