Advertisement

Leadership as Phenomenon: Reassessing the Philosophical Ground of Leadership Studies

  • Kenneth W. BohlEmail author
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to contribute to a more robust theory of leadership that shifts the frame of reference from leadership as exclusively facilitated through a single inspired leader to one that includes the view of leadership as an emergent and complex social phenomenon. The article begins with a review of the leader-centric approaches that dominated much of twentieth century leadership studies then moves on to present contemporary critiques of leader-centric approaches leading to an alternative perspective of leadership as an emergent and complex social phenomenon. Viewing leadership as an emergent and complex social phenomenon changes our attitude regarding the roles that leaders and others play in the creation of leadership. A central theme of this article is the impact that the concept of emergence has on leadership theory. In response to this changing attitude, the article then moves to return to and reassess the ontological, epistemological and ethical grounds of leadership and concludes that there is an underlying philosophy that supports viewing leadership as an emergent social phenomenon and further suggests that recent work in virtue epistemology along with Calvin Schrag’s theory of communicative praxis and transversal rationality, can facilitate a better understanding of leadership as an emergent social phenomenon.

Keywords

Philosophy of leadership Leadership phenomenon Social complexity Business ethics Leadership-as-practice 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, Z., Imad Zbib, Sawaridass Arokiasamy, T. Ramayah, and May Chiun Lo. 2006. Resistance to change and ERP implementation success: The moderating role of change management initiatives. Asian Academy of Management Journal 11 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, Mats, and Dan Kärreman. 2000. Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36 (2): 136–158.Google Scholar
  3. Antonakis, John, and David V. Day. 2018. The nature of leadership. 3rd Aufl. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. David Ross. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. 2002. Nicomachean ethics. In Nichomachean ethics: Translation, introduction and commentary, ed. Sarah Broadie. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Avolio, Bruce J., Fred O. Walumbwa, and Todd J. Weber. 2009. Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 421–449.Google Scholar
  8. Baehr, Jason S. 2011. The inquiring mind : On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford: OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, Richard A. 2001. The nature of leadership. Human Relations 54 (4): 469–494.Google Scholar
  10. Bass, Bernard M., and Ruth Bass. 2008. The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. 4th ed.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bennis, Warren. 2007. The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist 62 (1): 2.Google Scholar
  12. Betta, Michela. 2017. Habits and the social phenomenon of leadership. Philosophy of Management 17 (2): 243–256.Google Scholar
  13. Blackman, Deborah, James Connelly, and Steven Henderson. 2005. Beyond all reasonable doubt? Epistemological problems of the learning organisation. Philosophy of Management 5 (3): 103–121.Google Scholar
  14. Blom, Martin, and Mats Alvesson. 2015. All-inclusive and all good: The hegemonic ambiguity of leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31 (4): 480–492.Google Scholar
  15. Bolden, Richard, Jonathan Gosling, Antonio Marturano, and Paul Dennison. 2003. A review of leadership theory and competency frameworks. Centre for Leadership Studies, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  16. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1956. General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Management Science 2 (3): 197–208.Google Scholar
  17. Broadie, Sarah. 2002. Commentary. In Nichomachean ethics: Translation, introduction and commentary, ed. Sarah Broadie. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, Michael E., Linda K. Treviño, and David A. Harrison. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97 (2): 117–134.Google Scholar
  19. Bryman, Alan. 1992. Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  21. Burns, James MacGregor. 1978. Leadership. Kindle edition. New York: Open Road Integrated Media.Google Scholar
  22. Burns, James MacGregor. 2003. Transforming leadership: A new pursuit of happiness. Grove Press.Google Scholar
  23. Carlyle, Thomas. 1883. On heroes, hero-worship, and the heroic in history. New York: John B. Alden.Google Scholar
  24. Case, Peter, Robert French, and Peter Simpson. 2011. Philosophy of leadership. In Sage handbook of leadership, ed. David Collinson, Alan Bryman, Mary Uhl-Bien, and Brad Jackson, 242–254. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Ciulla, Joanne B. 2003. The ethics of leadership. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  26. Ciulla, Joanne B. 2018. Ethics and effectiveness: The nature of good leadership. In The nature of leadership, ed. John Antonakis and David V. Day, 438–468. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Code, Lorraine. 1984. Toward a "Responsibilist" epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1): 29–50.Google Scholar
  28. Cunliffe, Ann L., and Paul Hibbert. 2016. The philosophical basis of leadership-as-practice from a hermeneutical perspective. In Leadership-As-Practice : Theory and Application, ed. Joseph A. Raelin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Dahnke, Michael D. 2001. Ethics as first philosophy. Auslegung 24 (2).Google Scholar
  30. Day, David V., and John Antonakis. 2012. Leadership: Past, present, and future. In The nature of leadership, ed. David V. Day and John Antonakis. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Day, David V., John W. Fleenor, Leanne E. Atwater, Rachel E. Sturm, and Rob A. McKee. 2014. Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 63–82.Google Scholar
  32. De Bruin, Boudewijn. 2013. Epistemic virtues in business. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4): 583–595.Google Scholar
  33. De George, Richard T. 1987. The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3): 201–211.Google Scholar
  34. Denyer, David, and Kim Turnbull James. 2016. Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application. In Leadership-As-Practice : Theory and Application, ed. Joseph A. Raelin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. DePaul, Michael R., and Linda T. Zagzebski. 2003. Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Dewey, John. 1922. Human nature and conduct: an introduction to social psychology. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  37. Dezdar, Shahin, and Sulaiman Ainin. 2011. The influence of organizational factors on successful ERP implementation. Management Decision 49 (6): 911–926.Google Scholar
  38. Dinh, Jessica E., Robert G. Lord, William L. Gardner, Jeremy D. Meuser, Robert C. Liden, and Jinyu Hu. 2014. Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 36–62.Google Scholar
  39. Drath, Wilfred H., Cynthia D. McCauley, Charles J. Palus, Ellen Van Velsor, Patricia M.G. O'Connor, and John B. McGuire. 2008. Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 19 (6): 635–653.Google Scholar
  40. Fairhurst, Gail T. 2009. Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations 62 (11): 1607–1633.Google Scholar
  41. Ferrero, Ignacio, and Alejo José G. Sison. 2014. A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (4): 375–400.Google Scholar
  42. Fletcher, Joyce K. 2004. The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly 15 (5): 647–661.Google Scholar
  43. Freeman, R. Edward. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  44. French, John R., and Bertram Raven. 1959. The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. Dorwin Cartwright, 150–167. Ann Arbor: Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  45. Gardiner, Rita A. 2017. Ethical responsibility - an Arendtian turn. Business Ethics Quarterly 28 (1): 31–50.  https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.32.Google Scholar
  46. Gargeya, Vidyaranya B., and Cydnee Brady. 2005. Success and failure factors of adopting SAP in ERP system implementation. Business Process Management Journal 11 (5): 501–516.Google Scholar
  47. George, Bill. 2003. Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  48. Greenleaf, Robert K. 2002. Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. 25th anniversary ed. Mahway: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hannah, Sean, John Sumanth, Paul Lester, and Fabrice Cavarretta. 2014. Debunking the false dichotomy of leadership idealism and pragmatism: Critical evaluation and support of newer genre leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35 (5): 598.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1931.Google Scholar
  50. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Trans. John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  51. Hibbert, Paul, Nic Beech, and Frank Siedlok. 2017. Leadership formation: Interpreting experience. Academy of Management Learning & Education 16 (4): 603–622.Google Scholar
  52. Hooijberg, Robert. 1996. A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations 49 (7): 917–946.Google Scholar
  53. Horner, Melissa. 1997. Leadership theory: Past, present and future. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 3 (4): 270–287.Google Scholar
  54. Jones, Jen. 2014. Leadership lessons from Levinas: Revisiting responsible leadership. Leadership and the Humanities 2 (1): 44–63.Google Scholar
  55. Jung, Hwa Yol. 2011. Transversal rationality and intercultural texts: Essays in phenomenology and comparative philosophy. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kaiser, Robert B., Robert Hogan, and S. Bartholomew Craig. 2008. Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist 63 (2): 96.Google Scholar
  57. Kan, Melanie M., and Ken W. Parry. 2004. Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly 15 (4): 467–491.Google Scholar
  58. Katz, Daniel. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Kelly, Simon. 2014. Towards a negative ontology of leadership. Human Relations 67 (8): 905–922.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713503177.Google Scholar
  60. Kempster, Steve. 2009. How managers have learnt to lead: Exploring the development of leadership practice. Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Kempster, Stephen, and Ken W. Parry. 2011. Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective. The Leadership Quarterly 22 (1): 106–120.Google Scholar
  62. Knights, David, and Majella O’Leary. 2006. Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2): 125–137.Google Scholar
  63. Kodish, Slavica. 2006. The paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership 2 (4): 451–468.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715006069175.Google Scholar
  64. Kotter, John P. 2000. What leaders really do. The Bottom Line 13 (1).Google Scholar
  65. Lipman, Matthew. 2010. Philosophy goes to school. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Maak, Thomas, and Nicola M. Pless. 2006. Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1): 99–115.Google Scholar
  67. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1998. A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the twentieth century. 2nd Aufl.: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. May, Steve, George Cheney, and Juliet Roper. 2007. The debate over corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  69. Nadler, David A., and Michael L. Tushman. 1989. Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. Academy of Management Perspectives 3 (3): 194–204.Google Scholar
  70. Northouse, Peter G. 2016. Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  71. Raelin, Joseph A. 2011. From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership 7 (2): 195–211.Google Scholar
  72. Raelin, Joseph A. 2016. Leadership-as-practice : Theory and application. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Raelin, Joseph A. 2017. Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application—An editor’s reflection. Leadership 13 (2): 215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017702273.Google Scholar
  74. Rawwas, Mohammed Y.A., Surendra Arjoon, and Yusuf Sidani. 2013. An introduction of epistemology to business ethics: A study of marketing middle-managers. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3): 525–539.Google Scholar
  75. Roberts, Robert C., and W. Jay Wood. 2003. Humility and epistemic goods. In Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology, ed. Michael R. DePaul and Linda T. Zagzebski. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  76. Roberts, Robert C., and W. Jay Wood. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Kindle edition Aufl. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rost, Joseph C. 1993. Leadership for the twenty-first century. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  78. Rost, Joseph C. 2008. Followership an outmoded concept. In The Warren Bennis signature series. The art of followership: How great followers create great leaders and organizations, ed. R.E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, and J. Lipman-Blumen, 53–64. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  79. Schminke, Marshall, Deborah Wells, Joseph Peyrefitte, and Terrence C. Sebora. 2002. Leadership and ethics in work groups: A longitudinal assessment. Group & Organization Management 27 (2): 272–293.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, Marguerite, and Mark Somers. 2006. Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly 17 (4): 351–365.Google Scholar
  81. Schrag, Calvin O. 1986. Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
  82. Schrag, Calvin O. 1992. The resources of rationality: A response to the postmodern challenge. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  83. Schrag, Calvin O. 2003. Communicative praxis and the space of, subjectivity. Bloomington, IN: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  84. Sergi, Viviane. 2016. Who's leading the way? Investigating the contributions of materiality to leadership-as-practice. In Leadership-As-Practice : Theory and Application, ed. Joseph A. Raelin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Shotter, John. 2016. Turning leadership inside-out and front-to-back. In Leadership as practice: Theory and application, ed. Joseph A. Raelin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Silberstein, Michael, and John McGeever. 1999. The search for ontological emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195): 201–214.Google Scholar
  87. Simpson, Barbara. 2016. Where is the agency in leadership-as-practice? In Leadership-As-Practice : Theory and Application, ed. Joseph A. Raelin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Toor, S., and G. Ofori. 2008. Leadership versus management: How they are different, and why. Leadership and Management in Engineering 2: 61–71.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2008)8:2(61).Google Scholar
  89. Tsalikis, John, and David J. Fritzsche. 1989. Business ethics: A literature review with a focus on marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (9): 695–743.Google Scholar
  90. Uhl-Bien, Mary, Russ Marion, and Bill McKelvey. 2007. Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly 18 (4): 298–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.Google Scholar
  91. Vasconcelos, Flávio C., and Rafael Ramirez. 2011. Complexity in business environments. Journal of Business Research 64 (3): 236–241.Google Scholar
  92. Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and society an outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  93. Werhane, Patricia. 2018. The linguistic turn, social construction and the impartial spectator: Why do these ideas matter to managerial thinking? Philosophy of Management 17 (3): 265–278.Google Scholar
  94. Wood, Martin. 2005. The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies 42 (6): 1101–1121.Google Scholar
  95. Yammarino, Francis. 2013. Leadership past, present, and future. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 20 (2): 149–155.Google Scholar
  96. Yukl, Gary A. 2013. Leadership in organizations. 8th Aufl. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eberly College of Business and Information TechnologyIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations