Advertisement

Sustainable Water Resources Management

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 1929–1938 | Cite as

Identifying and counting zooplanktons and crustaceans in water of Karun River, Ahvaz city, Iran

  • Abdolkazem Neisi
  • Heidar Maleki
  • Vafa HamidEmail author
  • Mehdi Vosoughi
  • Parisa Moradi
Original Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Karun River has an important role in the lives of citizens in Ahvaz, especially those in the agricultural sector. Unfortunately, lack of any water management plans and the rather less attention paid to pollution have reduced water quality in this river. Given the importance of the ecological balance of the river, and considering the precise status of river water quality, the present study was aimed to identify and count the zooplanktons and crustaceans living in this river. In this study, sampling was done in two seasons (autumn and winter) at three stations. According to our findings, the most common types of zooplanktons were Monhystera simolis, Limnodrilus hoffmeister, Dero obtusa, and Rotaria rotatoria. The most common types of crustaceans were Daphnia magna, Monospilus dispar, and Alona costata. In addition, the measured BOD5 was greater than the standard index for water quality in Iran’s aquatic ecosystems in all sites during winter and autumn. The temperature crossed the standard limitation in winter, but the measured pH was within the standard range (6–9). Results of this study showed sewage-induced pollution in Karun River. Consequently, there is an urgent need to control sewage discharge to the Karun River.

Keywords

Karun River Water pollution Crustaceans Zooplanktons 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors of this article are thankful to and acknowledge the support of the Student Research Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences for their financial support. Research file number of this study is 93S116.

Funding

This study was funded by Student Research committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (grant number 93S116).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors are members of the Student Research Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. They have received research grants from this committee. Abdolkazem Neisi is also a member of the Environmental Technologies Research Centre of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Heidar Maleki has done some research in Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases (APRD) research center of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

References

  1. Adewumi AA, Idowu OE, Bamisile ST (2016) Food and feeding habits of Clarias gariepinus (burchell 1822) in Egbe Reservoir, Ekiti State, Nigeria. Anim Res Int 11:2041Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed AM (2017) Prediction of dissolved oxygen in Surma River by biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand using the artificial neural networks (ANNs). J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 29:151–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bard A (2017) Standard potentials in aqueous solution. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhateria R, Jain D (2016) Water quality assessment of lake water: a review. Sustain Water Resour Manag 2:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biard T et al (2016) In situ imaging reveals the biomass of giant protists in the global ocean. Nature 532:504.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongers T, Ferris H (1999) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 14:224–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01583-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton A, Brock M, Robson B, Ryder D, Chambers J, Davis J (2014) Australian freshwater ecology: processes and management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourne DG, Morrow KM, Webster NS (2016) Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu Rev Microbiol 70:317–340.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brönmark C, Hansson L-A (2017) The biology of lakes and ponds. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charubhun B, Charubhun N (2000) Biodiversity of freshwater Protozoa in Thailand. Kasetsart J (Natural Science) 34:486–494Google Scholar
  11. Cullen JJ, MacIntyre HL (2016) On the use of the serial dilution culture method to enumerate viable phytoplankton in natural communities of plankton subjected to ballast water treatment. J Appl Phycol 28:279–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0601-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dame RF (2016) Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach. CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dani B, Stéphanie G, Jordi S, Mònica M, Jaume G, Quintana D (2005) A new index of water quality assessment in Mediterranean wetlands based on crustacean and insect assemblages: the case of Catalunya (NE Iberian peninsula). Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:635–651.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denef VJ, Mueller RS, Chiang E, Liebig JR, Vanderploeg HA (2016) Chloroflexi CL500-11 populations that predominate deep-lake hypolimnion bacterioplankton rely on nitrogen-rich dissolved organic matter metabolism and C1 compound oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:1423–1432.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03014-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duong TM, McCauley SJ (2016) Predation risk increases immune response in a larval dragonfly (Leucorrhinia intacta). Ecology 97:1605–1610.  https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1964.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekhande A, Patil J, Patil R, Padate G (2013) Water quality monitoring–study of seasonal variation of rotifers and their correlation with physicochemical parameters of Yashwant Lake, Toranmal (MS) India. Arch Appl Sci Res 5:177–181Google Scholar
  17. Ezzat L, Towle E, Irisson JO, Langdon C, Ferrier-Pagès C (2016) The relationship between heterotrophic feeding and inorganic nutrient availability in the scleractinian coral T. reniformis under a short-term temperature increase. Limnol Oceanogr 61:89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forge T, Simard S (2001) Structure of nematode communities in forest soils of southern British Columbia: relationships to nitrogen mineralization and effects of clearcut harvesting and fertilization. Biol Fertil Soils 34:170–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fowler SW (2018) Biological transfer and transport processes. Pollutant transfer and transport in the sea. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 1–65.  https://doi.org/10.1201/2f9781351075848-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geist J, Hawkins SJ (2016) Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26:942–962.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Georg W et al (2010) The macroinvertebrate and nematode community from soft sediments in impounded sections of the river Elbe near Pardubice. Czech Republ Lauterbornia 69:87–105Google Scholar
  22. Glibert PM et al (2016) Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions. Limnol Oceanogr 61:165–197.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goudarzi G et al (2016) An evaluation of hospital admission respiratory disease attributed to sulfur dioxide ambient concentration in Ahvaz from 2011 through 2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:22001–22007.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7447-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hébert M-P, Beisner BE, Maranger R (2016) A meta-analysis of zooplankton functional traits influencing ecosystem function. Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill MJ et al (2017) Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Glob Change Biol 23:986–999.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson S, Ferris J, Ferris V (1974) Nematode community structure of forest woodlots: iII. Ordinations of taxonomic groups and biomass. J Nematol 6:118Google Scholar
  27. Kalpana R, Bhavan PS, Udayasuriyan R (2015) Water physico-chemical characteristics, species diversity and density of zooplankton in two perennial lakes of Coimbatore City (India). Annu Res Rev Biol.  https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2017/34749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamali Sanzighi M, Mousavi Nadushan R, Ghelichi A (2014) Biodiversity, density and frequency of Rotifers community at warm water fishes ponds at East of Golestan Province (Gonbade Kavous region). J Aquat Ecol 4:17Google Scholar
  29. Kirillov AA, Kirillova NY (2016) Analysis of the reproductive structure of the hemipopulation of the Cosmocerca ornata (Dujardin, 1845) (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae) in marsh frogs of different ages. Inland Water Biol 9:310–318.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s199508291603007x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozlowska J (1989) The effect of sewage sediments on communities of soil nematodes. Pol Ecol Stud 15:27–39Google Scholar
  31. Kumar A, Sharma M, Rai SP (2017a) A novel approach for river health assessment of Chambal using fuzzy modeling. India Desal Water Treat 58:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar A, Sharma M, Taxak A (2017b) Analysis of water environment changing trend in Bhagirathi tributary of Ganges in India. Desalin Water Treat 63:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leathwick JR, Collier KJ, Hicks BJ, Ling N, Stichbury G, Winton M (2016) Predictions of establishment risk highlight biosurveillance priorities for invasive fish in New Zealand lakes. Freshw Biol 61:1522–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magalhães L, Freitas R, de Montaudouin X (2016) Cockle population dynamics: recruitment predicts adult biomass, not the inverse. Mar Biol 163:16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-015-2809-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maleki H, Sorooshian A, Goudarzi G, Baboli Z, Birgani YT, Rahmati M (2019) Air pollution prediction by using an artificial neural network model. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01709-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehner T et al (2019) Feeding aquatic ecosystems: whole-lake experimental addition of angler’s ground bait strongly affects omnivorous fish despite low contribution to lake carbon budget. Ecosystems.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0273-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishra S, Kumar A, Yadav S, Singhal M (2015) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in Kali river, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Appl Nat Sci 7:1016–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mishra S, Kumar A, Yadav S, Singhal M (2018) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in water of Kali River using principle component and cluster analysis, India. Sustain Water Resour Manag 4:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peyghan S, Savari A, Doustshenas B, Sakhaee N, Dehghan MS (2011) New record of Acartia (Acartiella) faoensis Khalaf, 1991 (Copepoda: Calanoida: Acartidae) from Iranian waters of NW Persian Gulf. IJAB 7:177–179Google Scholar
  40. Prejs K (1977) The littoral and profundal benthic nematodes of lakes with different trophy. Ekologia polska 25:21–30Google Scholar
  41. Protocol K (2007) European Union European Environmental Law Review 179:13–22Google Scholar
  42. Rad HD et al (2019) Do Conocarpus erectus airborne pollen grains exacerbate autumnal thunderstorm asthma attacks in Ahvaz, Iran? Atmos Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahmani Z (2014) Dominant protozoan’s in Karoon River Water, Ahwaz city, Iran. Iran J Health Saf Environ 1:95–100Google Scholar
  44. Shayestehfar A, Abdovis S (2011) Diurnal fluctuations in population density of rotifera in relation to some physical and chemical parameters from Karun river, Khuzestan Province, Iran. Agric Sci Res J 1:272–276Google Scholar
  45. Soric R, Miron L, Acatrinel D (2011) The monitoring of water temperature, PH, and dissolved oxygen variation, in IZVORU-MUNTELUI BICAZ man-made lake, between 2009–2010. LUCRĂRI ȘTIINȚIFICE 2:274Google Scholar
  46. Spellman FR, Drinan J (2001) Stream ecology and self purification: an introduction. CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorstad EB et al (2016) Marine life of the sea trout. Mar Biol 163:47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-016-2820-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zullini A (1976) Nematodes as indicators of river pollution. Nematologia mediterranea 4:13–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdolkazem Neisi
    • 1
  • Heidar Maleki
    • 2
  • Vafa Hamid
    • 3
    Email author
  • Mehdi Vosoughi
    • 4
  • Parisa Moradi
    • 5
  1. 1.Environmental Health Engineering Department, Environmental Technologies Research CentreAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran
  2. 2.Environmental Engineering School of Water Sciences EngineeringShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran
  3. 3.Student Research Committee, Environmental Health Engineering DepartmentAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran
  4. 4.Environmental Health Engineering DepartmentArdabil University of Medical SciencesArdabilIran
  5. 5.Environmental Health Engineering DepartmentAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations