The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the sustainability of water resources: would monetary compensation warrant some more restrictions on dams?

  • Mohamed Tawfic AhmedEmail author
Original Article


The Ethiopian Government is currently building The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance dam (GERD) on the Blue Nile, one of the largest in Africa. The dam would be used as a hydropower station to generate electricity for Ethiopia domestic use, and also to export to other countries as source of hard currency. The dam reservoir was originally planned to store 14 billion cubic meter. However, this plan was changed, to increase the volume of water behind the dam to 74 billion cubic meter, much greater than the annual flow of the river. Filling the reservoir within short span of time would pose a potential threat to downstream countries, namely Egypt and Sudan. The situation would be even worsened if the filling process coincides with drought that would impact downstream countries even harder. This in turn is likely to cause significant cut down of freshwater supply to Egypt, with major impact on domestic use, agriculture, industry and environmental integrity. Hydropower installation, meanwhile are among the most impactful drivers of ecosystem change. Hence, affecting the quality and quantity of water released downstream, with potential bearing on the riverine and riparian ecosystems services in particular. The construction of the GERD comes amid a world-wide recognition of the negative impacts of dams, and calls for proper planning and site selection well in advance with consultation with all stakeholders, including downstream countries. Monetary valuation of ecosystem goods and services has been among the most widely and fast growing areas in environmental and ecological economics. The construction of dams and the multiple impacts they cause have captured interest in using monetary valuation to assess the monetary value of the damage caused. Economic valuation of ecosystem services is also a deterrent of any act that might negatively affect the quality and/or quantity of ecosystem services, and also for compensation claims between countries. The present study is one of the very few studies that look at GERD from its impacts lens, with special emphases on impact of water sustainability in Egypt. The study would also help drawing attention to the possible claims for compensation as a procedural step that can warrant more restrictions on dam construction.


Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam Nile River Downstream Water Economic valuation 



  1. Adams A (2000) Downstream impacts of dams Contributing paper, thematic review I.1: social impacts of large dams equity and distributional issues. World Commission on Dams, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcamo J et al (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, a report of the conceptual framework working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment, Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Allouche J, Middleton C, Gyawali Nexus D (2014) nirvana or nexus nullity? A dynamic approach to security and sustainability in the water-energy-food nexus STEPS Working Paper no. 63, STEPS Centre, Institute of development studies, Brighton, University of Sussex BrightonGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson EP, Freeman MC, Pringle CM (2006) Ecological consequences of hydropower development in Central America: impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages. River Res Appl 22:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batisha A (2015) Sustainability assessment in transboundary context: Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, model. Earth Syst Environ 1:36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehlert B, Strzepek K, Robinson S (2017) Analyzing the economy-wide impacts on Egypt of alternative GERD filling policies. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile Basin: implications for Transboundary Water Cooperation, Earthscan Studies in Water Resource Management, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 138–157 Accessed 11 June 2018
  7. Brisbane Declaration (2007) The Brisbane Declaration: environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being. 10th International river symposium, Brisbane, Australia, 3–6 September 2007. Accessed Apr 2017
  8. Chen H, Swain A (2014) The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: evaluating its sustainability standard and significance geopolitical significance. Energy Dev Front 3(1):11–19Google Scholar
  9. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon BM, Limburg K, Naeem S,’Neill RO, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, amd van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capita. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crossman ND, Bryan BA (2009) Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multi-functionality. Ecol Econ 68:654–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crossman ND, Bryan BA, Summers DM (2011) Carbon payments and low-cost conservation. Conserv Biol 25:835–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dakkak A (2017) Egypt’s water crisis—recipe for disaster. EcoMENA. Accessed 13 Nov 2018
  13. Earnhart D, Smith V (2003) Countervailing effects of atrazine on water recreation: how do recreators evaluate them?. Water Resour Res 39:1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FIVAS (2007) Ruined rivers, damaged lives-the impacts of the Theun-Hinboun hydropower project on downstream communities in Lao PDR. Association for International water and forest studies (FIVAS), Oslo, Norway. Accessed 4 Mar 2017
  15. Gleick PH (1993) Water in crisis: a guide to the world’s freshwater resources. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Gowan C, Stephenson K, Shabman L (2006) The role of ecosystem valuation in environmental decision making: hydropower relicensing and dam removal on the Elwha River. Ecol Econ 56:508–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansjürgens B, Droste N, Tockner K (2016) Neglected Values of major water engineering projects: ecosystem services, social impacts, and economic valuation. In: Hüttl R, Bens O, Bismuth C, Hoechstetter S (eds) Society—water—technology. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison D, Opperman J, Richter B (2007) Can hydropower be sustainable? Int Water Power Dam Constr 59:22–25Google Scholar
  19. Hussien W (2016) Will Renaissance Dam flood Egypt’s Mediterranean coast?. Al-Monitor The pulse of the middle east, Accessed Jan 2018
  20. Hüttl RF, Bens O, Bismuth C, Hoechstetter S (eds) (2016) Society - water - technology: a critical appraisal of major water engineering projects. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  21. International Hydropower Association (2010) Hydropower sustainability assessment protocol. International Hydropower Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. International Rivers (2012) Field Visit Report-GERD Project. International Rivers, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  23. International water association (2018) Sustainability in water supply. Accessed 13 Nov 2018
  24. Karaka R, Kumar P, Bansod B, Bachi S, Sharma P, Krishna CR (2017) Classification of heavy metal ions present in multi – frequency multi-electrode potable water data using evolutionary algorithm. Appl Water Sci 7:3679–3689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krchnak K, Richter B, Thomas G (2009) Integrating environmental flows into hydropower dam planning, design, and operations. World Bank Water Working Notes No. 22. World Bank Group, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Paquet P, Halimi S (2013) Hydropower development in the lower Mekong basin: alternative approaches to deal with uncertainty. Reg Environ Change 13:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar P, Thakur PK, Basond BK, Debnath SK (2017) Multi- criteria evaluation of hydro-geological and anthropogenic parameters for the groundwater vulnerability assessment. Environ Monit Assess 16(11):564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar P, Thakur PK, Bansod BK, Debnath SK (2018) Groundwater, a regional resource and a regional governance. Environ Dev Sustain 20:1133–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawrence WF, Goosem M, Laurance SGW (2009) Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 24(12):659–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ledec G, Quintero JD (2003) Good dams and bad dams: environmental criteria for site selection of hydroelectric projects. Latin America and Caribbean Region Sustainable Development Working Paper No. 16. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Latin America and Caribbean Region, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  31. Leggett CG, Bockstael NE (2000) Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. J Environ Econ Manag 39:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li JP, Dong SK, Yang ZF, Peng MC, Liu SL, Li LI (2012) Effects of cascade hydropower dams on the structure and distribution of riparian and upland vegetation along the middle lower Lancang-Mekong River. For Ecol Manag 284:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michael M, Magdy S, Meseret E (2017) Existing only from the Nile, Egypt fears disaster from a dam The associated press, 2 October 2017. Accessed Jan 2018
  34. Naiman RJ, Magnuson JJ, McKnight DM, Stanford JA (1995) The freshwater imperative. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. NLPC Nam Lik 1-2 Hydropower Development Project, Environmental impact assessment Nam Lik 1-2 Project Company Limited (China International Water & Electric Corp.) and National Consulting Company, Vientiane (2007)Google Scholar
  36. Opperman JJ, Harrison D (2008) Pursuing sustainability and finding profits: integrated planning at the system scale, paper no. 93. HCI Publications, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  37. Osborne M (2009) The Mekong—river under threat, Lowy Institute for International Policy, LonguevilleGoogle Scholar
  38. Pahl-Wostl C, Arthington A, Bogardi J et al (2013) Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Postel SL, Carpenter SR (1997) Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily G (ed) Nature’s services. Island Press, Washington, pp 195–214Google Scholar
  40. Quah E, Chong K, Choa E (2003) Environmental valuation: damage schedules. In: Paper presented at the economics and environment network national workshop, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 2–3 May 2003.
  41. Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K (2006) A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Res Appl 22(3):297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richter BD, Postel S, Revenga C, Scudder T, Lehner B, Churchill A, Chow M (2010) Lost in development’s shadow: the downstream human consequences of dams. Water Altern 3(2):14–42Google Scholar
  43. Russi D, ten Brink P, Farmer A, Badura T, Coates D, Förster J, Kumar R, Davidson N (2013) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlands. IEEP, London and Brussels; Ramsar Secretariat, Gland the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlandsGoogle Scholar
  44. Rutherford M, Knetsch J, Brown T (1998) Assessing environmental losses: judgments of importance and damage schedules. Harv Environ Law Rev 22(1):101–151Google Scholar
  45. Saied M (2017) “Will Egypt run out of water?” Al-Monitor, the pulse of the middle east. Accessed, January 2018). Accessed 30 Nov 2017
  46. The Nature Conservancy (2010) Sustainable rivers project. Accessed Jan 2018
  47. Turner R, Paavola P, Cooper S, Farber V, Jessamy, Georgiou S (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46:493–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. UN (2018) The Sustainable development goals report 2018.
  49. UN Human Rights Council (2011) The human right to safe drinking water and sanitation: resolution/adopted by the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/RES/16/2. Accessed Jan 2018
  50. UNEP (2002) Vital water graphics: an overview of the state of the world’s fresh and marine waters. Accessed 4 Mar 2017
  51. White P, Sharp B, Kerr G (2001) Economic value of the Waimea Plains groundwater system. J Hydrol 40:59–76Google Scholar
  52. World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and development a new framework for decision making. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhai HJ, Cui BS, Hu KJ, Zhang (2010) Prediction of river ecological integrity after cascade hydropower dam construction on the mainstream of rivers in Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region (LRGR), China. Ecol Eng 36:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Suez Canal UniversityIsmailiaEgypt

Personalised recommendations