Predictive models of biology students’ convictions towards bioethical issues
- 2 Downloads
This study aimed at determining B.S. Biology students’ comprehension of the Bioethics principles and conviction schemas towards bioethical issues; as well as at identifying predictors for comprehension of bioethical principles and convictions and creating model constructs of predictors which are fit for the data. One-hundred sixteen Filipino Biology majors were pre and post-tested for comprehension of bioethics principles and convictions towards bioethical issues. Predictors for comprehension and convictions among personal and family background factors, global and primary personality factors, and mental ability were identified through step-wise multiple regression. Constructed path models were tested for goodness of fit using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results showed that case study discussion and the bioethics course had positive effects on comprehension of the bioethics principles and on convictions towards bioethical issues. Predictors for comprehension of Bioethics principles before intervention were verbal ability, warmth, and exposure to media. Sex and openness to change were predictors for pre-convictions. Post-conviction predictors were anxiety, self-control, extraversion, liveliness, and perfectionism. Four out of five model constructs were accepted based on model fit criteria. In conclusion, personal factors, i.e., sex and personality factors are contributors in bioethical convictions; not cognitive factors like mental ability or comprehension of Bioethics principles; implying that bioethical convictions are already pre-conceived and that empathy-based experiences may strengthen convictions towards bioethical issues.
KeywordsEthics education Bioethics Bioethical convictions Model constructs
This research would not have been possible if not for the scholarship and research grant of Dr. Jeannemar Genevive Yap-Figueras under the Department of Science and Technology Science Education Institute-Accelerated Science and Technology Human Resource Development Program (DOST-SEI ASTHRDP) of the Philippines, the support of West Visayas State University, particularly the University Research Center and Development for the research funding; WVSU University Testing Center, and the personal assistance of Ms. Elzie Palmes as checker and interpreter. For all of these, this the researcher is greatly indebted.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Athota, V. S., & Peter, J. O. (2009). ResearchOnline @ ND.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1996). Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency, 71(2), 364–374.Google Scholar
- Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Cushman, F. A., Pizarro, D. A., & Mcgraw, A. P. (2015). Moral judgment and decision making. In G. Kerem, G. and Wu (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgement and Decision Making (1st ed., pp. 478–515). John Wiley and Sons,Ltd. Retrieved from home.uchicago.edu/bartels/papers/BartelsEtAl-MoralJDM-2015.pdf. Accessed 07/26/2017.
- Cesur, S., and M.S. Top. 2010. Report Information from ProQuest a reliability and validity study of the defining issues test : The relationship of age , education , gender and parental education with moral development. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 10 (3): 1681–1697.Google Scholar
- Ebbesen, M. 2011. Cross cultural principles for bioethics, 207–215 Retrieved from http://www.intechopen.com/books/show/title/advanced-biomedical-engineering. Accessed 03/26/2013Google Scholar
- Gleichgerrcht, E., and L. Young. 2013. Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS One 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418.
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling : Guidelines for Determining Model Fit, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
- Jagger, K. S., & Furlong, J. (2014). Theme : Scientific Ethics Infusing Bioethics into Biology and Microbiology Courses and Curricula : A Vertical Approach, 15(2), 213–217.Google Scholar
- Johnston, J.S. 2009. Rule following standards of practice and open-mindedness. Paideusis 18 (1): 17.25.Google Scholar
- Keith, T.Z. 1993. Latent variable structural equation models: LISTREL in special education research. Remedial and Special Education. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259301400609.
- Kerr, N. A. (2007). Are there personality factors that can undermine moral judgment development ?Google Scholar
- Kuhse, H. and Singer, P. (Ed.). (2009). 1 . What is bioethics ? A historical introduction. In Bioethics (2nd editio, pp. 1–7). Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children ’ s moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(July 1998), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<557::AID-EJSP946>3.0.CO;2-T.
- Melorose, J., Perroy, R., & Careas, S. (2015). a Social Learning Theory and Moral Disengagement Analysis of Criminal Computer Behavior: an Exploratory Study. Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015, 1(C). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
- Park, M., D. Kjervik, J. Crandell, and M.H. Oermann. 2012. The relationship of ethics education to moral sensitivity and moral reasoning skills of nursing students. Nursing Ethics. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011433922.
- Paxton, J. M., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Moral Reasoning : Hints and Allegations, 2, 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01096.x.
- Riegle, S., Frye, A., Glenn, J., & Smith, K. (2012). Assessing Medical Students’ Moral Judgment over the Course of a Four-Year Professionalism and Humanism Curriculum. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (April 2012). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED534225&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED534225. Accessed 07/27/2017.
- Stoljiljkovic, S. 1998. Personality characteristics and moral judgement. Facta Universitatis 1 (5): 507–514.Google Scholar
- Tiberius, V. 2012. Open-mindedness and normative contingency 1. Vol. 7, 182–204.Google Scholar
- Troy, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2002). Socioscientific issues and affect 1 Socioscientific issues and the affective domain : Scientific literacy ’ s missing Link University of South Florida college of education department of secondary education 4202 East Fowler Avenue EDU162 Paper Presented at.Google Scholar
- Vollum, S., and J. Buffington-Vollum. 2010. An examination of social-psychological factors and support for the death penalty: Attribution, moral disengagement, and the value-expressive function of attitudes. American Journal of Criminal Justice 35: 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/512103-009-9068-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yap-Figueras, J.G. 2013. Case study discussion for students’ comprehension of the four bioethics principles. West Visayas State University Research Journal 2 (2): 43–53.Google Scholar