Advertisement

Insularity and the development of a local railway network

  • F. Cerina
  • L. CoccoEmail author
  • K. Mannaro
  • M. Marchesi
  • F. Pigliaru
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This paper quantitatively assesses the negative impact of land discontinuity on the development of a railway network on an island. This implicit cost of insularity is because an insular railway network only serves the territory in which it is located while the same network on a mainland also serves other regions. We apply this idea to the case of a simplified Italian railway network and we implement it through a simulation model. The simulation results highlight the strong negative effect of land discontinuity: whereas the railway lines located on the island of Sardinia are the least profitable under the factual scenario, their relative profitability is significantly boosted in every counterfactual scenario where the land discontinuity is artificially removed.

Keywords

Insularity Simulation modeling Railway networks Regional development 

JEL Classification

R41 R12 R58 C63 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has benefited from the financial support of the Regione Autonoma Della Sardegna (Legge n. 7) under the project “Analysis of the additional economic costs of the state of insularity”.

References

  1. Armstrong, H. W., & Read, R. (1998). Trade and growth in small states: The impact of global trade liberalisation. World Economy, 21, 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, H. W., & Read, R. (2004). Insularity, remoteness, mountains and archipelagos: A combination of challenges facing small states?, Paper presented for the Regional Studies Association Conference Europe at the Margins: EU Regional Policy. Peripherality and Rurality: University of Angers.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, H. W., Ballas, D., & Staines, A. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Performance of Greek and British Small Islands, Paper presented at the 36th Regional Science Association International (British and Irish Section) conference. Channel Islands: Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. Auscher, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrens, K., Gaign, C., Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Thisse, J. F. (2006). Is remoteness a locational disadvantage? Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertram, G., & Karagedikli, X. X. (2004). Are pacific economies converging or diverging? In J. Poot (Ed.), On the edge of the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  7. Briguglio, L. (1995). Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Development, 23, 1615–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerina, F. (2015). Insularity: Insights from the New Economic Geography. CRENoS working paper 15/21.Google Scholar
  9. Cocco, L., Deidda, M., Marchesi, M., & Pigliaru, F. (2018). Can islands profit from economies of density? An application to the retail sector, Regional Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1490500.
  10. CRENoS. (2014). Economia della Sardegna. CUEC: XXI Rapporto.Google Scholar
  11. CRENoS. (2015). Economia della Sardegna. CUEC: XXII Rapporto.Google Scholar
  12. De Benedictis, L., & Pinna, A. M. (2015). Islands as? Bad Geography?. Insularity, Connectedness, Trade Costs and Trade. CRENoS working paper 15/04.Google Scholar
  13. Deidda, M. (2015). Insularity and economic development: A survey. International Review of Economics, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  14. Del Gatto, M., & Mastinu, C. S. (2015). Geography, Cultural Remoteness and Economic Development: A Regional Analysis of the Economic Consequences of Insularity. CRENoS working paper 15/03.Google Scholar
  15. Dennis, S. M., & Talley W. K. (2007). Railroad Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 20.Google Scholar
  16. Espon. (2013). The Development of the Islands—European Islands and Cohesion Policy (EUROISLANDS), Interim Report.Google Scholar
  17. Espon. (2015). Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe, Volume 1b, TRACC Main Report.Google Scholar
  18. Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 22, 179–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson, J. V., Shalizi, Z., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Geography and development. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lall, S. V. (2007). Infrastructure and regional growth, growth dynamics and policy relevance for India. Annals of Regional Science, 41, 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, P. (1999). Public policies, regional inequalities and growth. Journal of Public Economics, 73, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortuzar, J. D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transpor (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ottaviano, G. I., Tabuchi, T., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Agglomeration and trade revisited. International Economic Review, 43, 409–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ottaviano, G. I., & Thisse, J. F. (2005). New economic geography: What about the N? Environment and Planning A, 37(10), 1707–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodrik, D., Subramaniam, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wardman, M. (2006). Demand for rail travel and the effects of external factors. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(3), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wardman, M., Lythgoe, W., & Whelan, G. (2007). Rail passenger demand forecasting: Cross-sectional models revisited. Research in Transportation Economics, 20, 119–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Centre for North South economic research (CRENoS)CagliariItaly
  3. 3.Department of Electric and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  5. 5.Department of LawUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations