Advertisement

Economia Politica

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 399–414 | Cite as

Does FDI generate technological spillovers in the host country? Evidence from patent citations

  • Antonio NavasEmail author
Original Paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

This paper explores the existence of technological spillovers coming from FDI in less developed host countries. Our results are based on a direct measure of technological flows across firms: patent citations. We find evidence supporting the idea that FDI exerts positive technological spillovers in the host country, although the results suggest that it may take about 8–9 years for these spillovers to occur. In addition, our results suggest that these spillovers are not homogeneous across all countries in the sample. While we find positive spillovers in South East Asian economies, this turns out not to be the case for South American economies.

Keywords

Technology transfer FDI Patent citations 

JEL classification

F23 F62 F00 

Notes

References

  1. Aitken, B., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfaro, L. (2017). Gains from foreign direct investment: Macro and micro approaches. World Bank Economic Review Volume 30, Issue Supplement_1 Published: March 2017, pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
  3. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsden, A. H. (1991). Diffusion of development: The late-industrializing model and Greater East Asia. American Economic Review, 81(2), 282–286.Google Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J.-W. (1994). Sources of economic growth. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1–46). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Borenzstein, E., DE Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2005). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47(4), 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branstetter, L. (2006). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidenced from Japan’s FDI in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 68, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2003). Technology gaps, absorptive capacity and the impact of inward investments on productivity of European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(6), 55–576.Google Scholar
  10. Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Criscuolo, P. (2003). Reverse technology transfer: A patent citation analysis of the European chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  12. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech Enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haddad, M., & Harrison, Ann E. (1993). Are these positive spillovers derived from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaffe, A., & Hu, A. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffe, A., Trajtemberg, M., & Fogarty, M. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 90(2), 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katayama, H., Lu, S., & Tybout, J. (2003). Why plant-level productivity studies are often misleading, and an alternative approach to interference. NBER Working Papers 9617, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Google Scholar
  19. Krugman, P. (2015). International economics (10th ed.). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Mancusi, M. L. (2008). International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markusen, J. R. (1995). The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MC Garvie, M. (2005). The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations. Economics Letters, 87(1), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peri, G. (2006). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNCTAD. (2012). World investment report: Towards a new set of investment policies.Google Scholar
  25. Veugelers, H., & Cassiman, B. (2004). Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: Some direct firm level evidence from Belgium. European Economic Review, 48(2), 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, B. (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations