Advertisement

Methacrylated Hyaluronic Acid–Based Hydrogels Maintain Stemness in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells

  • Kumar Kulldeep Niloy
  • Muhammad Gulfam
  • Keegan B. Compton
  • Dong Li
  • George T.-J. Huang
  • Tao L. LoweEmail author
Article
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Invited Papers— Tao L. Lowe

Abstract

2-Aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA)–modified hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels with tunable swelling, degradation, and rheological properties were developed to maintain the native spherical and stemness of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). Two molecular weights (MW) of HA, 18 and 270 kDa, and 25% degree of AEMA substitution were used to synthesize the HA macromers and hydrogels. The HA macromers were characterized by 1H NMR, and the AEMA-HA hydrogels were synthesized by UV polymerization. The swelling, hydrolytic degradation, and rheological properties of the hydrogels strongly depended on the MW of HA. The degradation rate decreased and the storage modulus increased with the increase in the MW of HA. The storage modulus of the hydrogels decreased with degradation of the hydrogels. The hydrogels were not cytotoxic to DPSCs evidenced by MTT assay, Hoechst 33342 live cell staining, and propidium iodide dead cell staining. The hydrogels maintained the native spherical morphology and stemness of DPSCs when the hydrogels’ storage moduli were in the ranges of 486–681 Pa. In contrast, DPSCs grown on 2D cell culture substrates showed a flat and elongated shape and could not maintain their native spherical shape. The hydrogels increased the expression of the stemness including NANOG and SOX2 of DPSCs (3 and 24 folds, respectively) when their storage modulus was 681.41 ± 92.81 Pa in comparison with DPSCs grown on 2D cell culture plates. The designed AEMA-HA hydrogels mimic the in vivo 3D environment to grow DPSCs. Thus, they appear to have great potential for clinical applications in regenerative medicine and other therapeutic remedies after further optimization in the future.

Lay Summary

Regenerative medicine is a translational approach that offers the possibility to replace or heal the diseased or damaged tissues caused by trauma, age, infection, cancer, or inherited defects. Such reinstatement of the functionality or healing of the damaged cells or tissues often includes the combination of numerous strategies including the use of biomaterials/scaffolds, stem cells, growth factors, and small molecules. In this study, we used hyaluronic acid (HA), a naturally occurring polysaccharide biopolymer commonly found in the extracellular matrix of connective tissues, to synthesize 3D hydrogel scaffolds for growing human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). We evaluated the effects of the molecular weight of HA, and the swelling, degradation, and rheological properties of the hydrogels on maintaining the native spherical and stemness of DPSCs for future therapeutic applications including regenerative medicine.

Keywords

Hyaluronic acid Hydrogels Degradation Storage modulus Dental pulp stem cells tubulin staining stemness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Linfeng Wu for helping with the AEMA-HA macromer and hydrogel syntheses and chemical structure characterizations. We thank Sangyoon Kim for helping with the viscosity measurement of the 18K-25 macromer.

Funding Information

This work was supported in part by grants from R21 EY017145 (T.L.L.).

References

  1. 1.
    Mironov V, Visconti RP, Markwald RR. What is regenerative medicine? Emergence of applied stem cell and developmental biology. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004;4(6):773–81.  https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.4.6.773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vishnubalaji R, Al-Nbaheen M, Kadalmani B, Aldahmash A, Ramesh T. Skin-derived multipotent stromal cells--an archrival for mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;350(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1471-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martello G, Smith A. The nature of embryonic stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:647–75.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tewary M, Shakiba N, Zandstra PW. Stem cell bioengineering: building from stem cell biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:595–614.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0040-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madl CM, Heilshorn SC, Blau HM. Bioengineering strategies to accelerate stem cell therapeutics. Nature. 2018;557(7705):335–42.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0089-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gronthos S, Brahim J, Li W, Fisher LW, Cherman N, Boyde A, et al. Stem cell properties of human dental pulp stem cells. J Dent Res. 2002;81(8):531–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(25):13625–30.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240309797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anitua E, Troya M, Zalduendo M. Progress in the use of dental pulp stem cells in regenerative medicine. Cytotherapy. 2018;20(4):479–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ducret M, Fabre H, Degoul O, Atzeni G, McGuckin C, Forraz N, et al. Manufacturing of dental pulp cell-based products from human third molars: current strategies and future investigations. Front Physiol. 2015;6:213.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nuti N, Corallo C, Chan BMF, Ferrari M, Gerami-Naini B. Multipotent differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells: a literature review. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2016;12(5):511–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-016-9661-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayo V, Sawatari Y, Huang CYC, Garcia-Godoy F. Neural crest-derived dental stem cells—where we are and where we are going. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1043–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aurrekoetxea M, Garcia-Gallastegui P, Irastorza I, Luzuriaga J, Uribe-Etxebarria V, Unda F, et al. Dental pulp stem cells as a multifaceted tool for bioengineering and the regeneration of craniomaxillofacial tissues. Front Physiol. 2015;6:289.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollands P, Aboyeji D, Orcharton M. Dental pulp stem cells in regenerative medicine. Bdj. 2018;224:747–50.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li D, Zou XY, El-Ayachi I, Romero LO, Yu Z, Iglesias-Linares A, et al. Human dental pulp stem cells and gingival mesenchymal stem cells display action potential capacity in vitro after neuronogenic differentiation. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2018;15:67–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-018-9854-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gay I, Cavender A, Peto D, Sun Z, Speer A, Cao H, et al. Differentiation of human dental stem cells reveal a role for microRNA-218. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(1):110–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Habib M, Yu Z, Huang GT. Small molecules affect human dental pulp stem cell properties via multiple signaling pathways. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(17):2402–13.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cha H-M, Kim S-M, Choi Y-S, Kim D-I. Scaffold-free three-dimensional culture systems for mass production of periosteum-derived progenitor cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;120(2):218–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin CY, Chin YT, Kuo PJ, Lee HW, Huang HM, Lin HY, et al. 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-beta-glucoside potentiates self-renewal of human dental pulp stem cells via the AMPK/ERK/SIRT1 axis. Int Endod J. 2018;51(10):1159–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu WH, Chang YL, Lo WL, Li HY, Hsiao CW, Peng CH, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell and nanotechnology-based therapeutics. Cell Transplant. 2015;24(11):2185–95.  https://doi.org/10.3727/096368914x685113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahmed NE-MB, Murakami M, Kaneko S, Nakashima M. The effects of hypoxia on the stemness properties of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). Sci Rep. 2016;6:35476.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35476 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35476#supplementary-information.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laksana K, Sooampon S, Pavasant P, Sriarj W. Cobalt chloride enhances the stemness of human dental pulp cells. J Endod. 2017;43(5):760–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keung AJ, Kumar S, Schaffer DV. Presentation counts: microenvironmental regulation of stem cells by biophysical and material cues. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:533–56.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Madl CM, LeSavage BL, Dewi RE, Dinh CB, Stowers RS, Khariton M, et al. Maintenance of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires matrix remodelling. Nat Mater. 2017;16(12):1233–42.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat5020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Madl CM, Heilshorn SC. Engineering hydrogel microenvironments to recapitulate the stem cell niche. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;20:21–47.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gerecht S, Burdick JA, Ferreira LS, Townsend SA, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Hyaluronic acid hydrogen for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(27):11298–303.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703723104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siti-Ismail N, Bishop AE, Polak JM, Mantalaris A. The benefit of human embryonic stem cell encapsulation for prolonged feeder-free maintenance. Biomaterials. 2008;29(29):3946–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee ST, Yun JI, Jo YS, Mochizuki M, van der Vlies AJ, Kontos S, et al. Engineering integrin signaling for promoting embryonic stem cell self-renewal in a precisely defined niche. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1219–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lei YG, Schaffer DV. A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(52):E5039–E48.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309408110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin HS, Li Q, Lei YG. An integrated miniature bioprocessing for personalized human induced pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation into neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40191.
  30. 30.
    Wong CW, Chen YT, Chien CL, Yu TY, Rwei SP, Hsu SH. A simple and efficient feeder-free culture system to up-scale iPSCs on polymeric material surface for use in 3D bioprinting. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl. 2018;82:69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tong CQ, Liu TX, Talens VS, Noteborn WEM, Sharp TH, Hendrix M, et al. Squaramide-based supramolecular materials for three-dimensional cell culture of human induced pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(4):1091–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang JJ, Liu JF, Kurokawa T, Kitada K, Gong JP. Hydrogels as feeder-free scaffolds for long-term self-renewal of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(4):375–88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Park YB, Ha CW, Kim JA, Kim S, Park YG. Comparison of undifferentiated versus chondrogenic predifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood for cartilage repair in a rat model. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(2):451–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518815151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ko DY, Patel M, Lee HJ, Jeong B. Coordinating thermogel for stem cell spheroids and their cyto-effectiveness. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(7).  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706286.
  35. 35.
    Rustad KC, Wong VW, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Major MR, Rajadas J, et al. Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33(1):80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun XM, Zhang HB, He JL, Cheng RY, Cao YW, Che KM, et al. Adjustable hardness of hydrogel for promoting vascularization and maintaining sternness of stem cells in skin flap regeneration. Appl Mater Today. 2018;13:54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dong DY, Hao T, Wang CY, Zhang Y, Qin ZH, Yang BG, et al. Zwitterionic starch-based hydrogel for the expansion and “sternness” maintenance of brown adipose derived stem cells. Biomaterials. 2018;157:149–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chamieh F, Collignon A-M, Coyac BR, Lesieur J, Ribes S, Sadoine J, et al. Accelerated craniofacial bone regeneration through dense collagen gel scaffolds seeded with dental pulp stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38814.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferroni L, Gardin C, Sivolella S, Brunello G, Berengo M, Piattelli A, et al. A hyaluronan-based scaffold for the in vitro construction of dental pulp-like tissue. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(3):4666–81.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16034666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Paduano F, Marrelli M, White LJ, Shakesheff KM, Tatullo M. Odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells on hydrogel scaffolds derived from decellularized bone extracellular matrix and collagen type I. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148225.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang GTJ, Yamaza T, Shea LD, Djouad F, Kuhn NZ, Tuan RS, et al. Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo model. Tissue Eng- Part A. 2010;16(2):605–15.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhu X, Liu J, Yu Z, Chen CA, Aksel H, Azim AA, et al. A miniature swine model for stem cell-based de novo regeneration of dental pulp and dentin-like tissue. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018;24:108–20.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Luo L, Albashari AA, Wang X, Jin L, Zhang Y, Zheng L, et al. Effects of transplanted heparin-poloxamer hydrogel combining dental pulp stem cells and bFGF on spinal cord injury repair. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:2398521.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2398521.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fakhari A, Berkland C. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7081–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2011;23(12):H41–56.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burdick JA, Chung C, Jia X, Randolph MA, Langer R. Controlled degradation and mechanical behavior of photopolymerized hyaluronic acid networks. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(1):386–91.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049508a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kowitsch A, Zhou G, Groth T. Medical application of glycosaminoglycans: a review. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(1):e23–41.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Almeida LDF, Babo PS, Silva CR, Rodrigues MT, Hebling J, Reis RL, et al. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels incorporating platelet lysate enhance human pulp cell proliferation and differentiation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29(6):88.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6088-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Apel C, Buttler P, Salber J, Dhanasingh A, Neuss S. Differential mineralization of human dental pulp stem cells on diverse polymers. Biomed Tech. 2018;63(3):261–9.  https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2016-0141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nemeth CL, Janebodin K, Yuan AE, Dennis JE, Reyes M, Kim D-H. Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells using nanopatterned PEG-GelMA-HA hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(21–22):2817–29.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Williams LD, Farley A, Cupelli M, Alapati S, Kennedy MS, Dean D. Effects of substrate stiffness on dental pulp stromal cells in culture. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106(7):1789–97.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peng YM, Liu QJ, He TL, Ye K, Yao X, Ding JD. Degradation rate affords a dynamic cue to regulate stem cells beyond varied matrix stiffness. Biomaterials. 2018;178:467–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Madl CM, Heilshorn SC. Engineering hydrogel microenvironments to recapitulate the stem cell niche. In: Yamush ML, editor. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, Vol 20. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering; 2018. p. 21–47.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rizzino A, Wuebben EL. Sox2/Oct4: a delicately balanced partnership in pluripotent stem cells and embryogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859(6):780–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rizzino A. Concise review: the Sox2-Oct4 connection: critical players in a much larger interdependent network integrated at multiple levels. Stem Cells. 2013;31(6):1033–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gagliardi A, Mullin NP, Ying Tan Z, Colby D, Kousa AI, Halbritter F, et al. A direct physical interaction between Nanog and Sox2 regulates embryonic stem cell self-renewal. EMBO J. 2013;32(16):2231–47.  https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chen YY, He ST, Yan FH, Zhou PF, Luo K, Zhang YD, et al. Dental pulp stem cells express tendon markers under mechanical loading and are a potential cell source for tissue engineering of tendon-like tissue. Int J Oral Sci. 2016;8(4):213–22.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2016.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Regenerative Engineering Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Bioscience Research, College of DentistryUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations