Advertisement

Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 432–443 | Cite as

Low Velocity Impact of Bistable Laminated CFRP Composites

  • C. A. Abarotin
  • O. J. Myers
  • G. J. PatakyEmail author
Research Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Laminated carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have gained popularity in engineering applications due to their lightweight and strong in-plane mechanical properties. This material, however, performs poorly with respect to out-of-plane impact resistance. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of bistability on the low velocity impact resistance of laminated CFRP composites. Bistable composites have the ability to alternate between two different geometric equilibria through external loading, and when unloaded, do not require external forces to maintain either geometry. Laminated CFRP composite specimens of bistable, flat symmetric, and curved symmetric configurations were subjected to low velocity impacts of 20 J. The acceleration and force of each impact was recorded using an accelerometer and a load cell mounted on the impactor. The sensor data was used to analyze the dynamic response and calculate the energy absorption of each impact. Post-impact crack length measurements and damage characterization were used to conduct a damage resistance analysis. The effects of geometry, stacking sequence, and bistability of the impacted specimens were determined. The results showed that bistability improves the low velocity impact damage resistance of laminated CFRP composites through increased energy absorption and specimen kinetic energy.

Keywords

Carbon fiber Low velocity impact Bistability Impact behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Brandon Ross for access to the high speed camera utilized in this research and Michael Stoner for assisting in the usage of the camera.

References

  1. 1.
    Emam SA, Inman DJ (2015) A review on bistable composite laminates for morphing and energy harvesting. Appl Mech Rev 67:060803.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032037 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schultz MR, Hyer MW (2003) Snap-through of unsymmetric cross-ply laminates using piezoceramic actuators. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 14:795–814.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104538903039261 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hyer MW (1981) Some observations on the curved shapes of thin unsymmetric laminates. J Compos Mater 15:175–194Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Etches J, Potter K, Weaver P, Bond I (2009) Environmental effects on thermally induced multistability in unsymmetric composite laminates. Compos A 40:1240–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.05.018 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brampton CJ, Betts DN, Bowen CR, Kim HA (2013) Sensitivity of bistable laminates to uncertainties in material properties, geometry and environmental conditions. Compos Struct 102:276–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.005 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giddings PF, Bowen CR, Salo AIT, Kim HA, Ive A (2010) Bistable composite laminates: effects of laminate composition on cured shape and response to thermal load. Compos Struct 92:2220–2225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.043 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim SW, Koh JS, Lee JG, Ryu J, Cho M, Cho KJ (2014) Flytrap-inspired robot using structurally integrated actuation based on bistability and a developable surface. Bioinspir Biomim 9:10.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/036004 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gigliotti M, Wisnom MR, Potter KD (2003) Development of curvature during the cure of AS4/8552 [0/90] unsymmetric composite plates. System 63:187–197Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thill C, Etches J, Bond I, Potter K, Weaver P (2008) Morphing skins. Aeronaut J 112:117–139Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Troldborg N, Sørensen J (2014) A simple atmospheric boundary layer model applied to large eddy simulations of wind turbine wakes. Wind Energy 17:657–669Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daynes S, Weaver PM (2013) Review of shape-morphing automobile structures: concepts and outlook. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D 227:1603–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407013496557 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harne RL, Wang KW (2013) A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems. Smart Mater Struct 22:023001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/023001 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cantwell W (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials - a review. Composites 5:347–362Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abrate S (1991) Impact on laminated composite materials. Appl Mech Rev 44:155.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119500 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minak G, Ghelli D (2008) Influence of diameter and boundary conditions on low velocity impact response of CFRP circular laminated plates. Compos B Eng 39:962–972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.001 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aoki Y, Yamada K, Ishikawa T, Suemasu H (2007) Damage propagation in CFRP laminates. Compos Struct 16:1–2Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou G (1998) The use of experimentally-determined impact force as a damage measure in impact damage resistance and tolerance of composite structures. Compos Struct 42:375–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-3747(90)90340-8 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Compos A 27:1123–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM International (2005) D7136, standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM Int Des D.  https://doi.org/10.1520/d7136
  20. 20.
    Tita V, de Carvalho J, Vandepitte D (2008) Failure analysis of low velocity impact on thin composite laminates: experimental and numerical approaches. Compos Struct 83:413–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.003 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caprino G, Lopresto V (2001) On the penetration energy for fibre-reinforced plastics under low-velocity impact conditions. Compos Sci Technol 61:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-4 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cantwell W (2007) Geometrical effects in the low velocity impact response of GFRP. Compos Sci Technol 67:1900–1908.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.015 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robinson P, Davies GAO (1992) Impactor mass and specimen geometry effects in low velocity impact of laminated composites. Int J Impact Eng 12:189–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu D, Raju BB, Dang X (1998) Size effects on impact response of composite laminates. Int J Impact Eng 21:837–854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00036-0 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winkel JD, Adams DF (1985) Instrumented drop weight impact testing of cross-ply and fabric composites. Composites 16:268–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(85)90279-4 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmad F, Hong JW, Choi HS, Park MK (2016) Hygro effects on the low-velocity impact behavior of unidirectional CFRP composite plates for aircraft applications. Compos Struct 135:276–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.040 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Figliola RS, Beasley DE (2011) Theory and design for mechanical measurements. Wiley, New York, p 585Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kline FA, McClintock SJ (1953) Describing uncertainties in single sample experiments. Mech Eng 1:3–8Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao GP, Cho CD (2007) Damage initiation and propagation in composite shells subjected to impact. Compos Struct 78:91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.013 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ambur RD, Starnes HJ (1998) Effect of curvature on the impact damage characteristics and residual strength of composites. NASA. 208124Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ohsawa T, Miwa M, Kawade M, Tsushima E (1990) Axial compressive strength of carbon fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 39:1733–1743.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1990.070390811 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chand S (2000) Carbon fibers for composites. J Mater Sci 35:1303–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004780301489 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Quaresiin M, Ricotta M, Martello L, Main S (2013) Energy absorption in composite laminates under impact loading. Compos B Eng 44(1):133–140Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Emam SA (2018) Snapthrough and Free vibration of bistable composite laminates using a simplified Rayleigh-Ritz model. Compos Struct 206:403–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.035 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Evci Celal (2015) Thickness-dependent energy dissipation characteristics of laminated composites subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 133(1):508–521Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schoeppner GA, Abrate S (2000) Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos A 31:903–915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-0 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang Bing, Ge Chao, Fancey Kevin S (2017) Snap-through behaviour of a bistable structure based on viscoelastically generated prestress. Compos B Eng 114:23–33Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Samer A, Tawfik D (2011) Stefan Dancila, and Erian Armanios. Planform effects upon the bistable response of cross-ply composite shells. Compos A 42:825–833Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations