Advertisement

Marine Systems & Ocean Technology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 42–50 | Cite as

Mobility and risk assessment of heavy metals by sequential extraction in coastal sediment south Mediterranean Sea, Egypt

  • Maha Ahmed Mohamed AbdallahEmail author
  • Adel Amer Mohamed
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The chemical speciation of metals (Cd, Zn, Cu, and Fe) for coastal marine sediment samples collected from ten locations in the Western Harbour (main harbour) in Egypt and has been studied in two surveys which were determined using the four-step sequential extraction procedure. A sequential extraction technique was used to quantify exchangeable, oxides (reducible), organic/sulphidic, and acid-soluble (residual) fraction. It was noticed that Cd and Zn have the highest capability to be released from the sediment, more mobile and bioavailable, by the simple ion exchange mechanism in the W.H than Cu and Fe which were present at higher percentages in the acid-soluble fraction, meaning that these two metals were strongly bound to the sediments. Considering the percentage of metals extracted in the most labile fractions (F1 + F2 + F3), the order of mobility (from most to least bioavailable) was: Cd (94%) > Zn (64%) > Cu (22%) > Fe (3.5%). Risk assessment code (RAC) analysis indicated that the sediments show no risk for Fe and a low risk for Cu and low-to-medium risks for Zn and medium-to-high risks for Cd with RAC values greater than 11% and 30%, respectively, indicating a substantial risk of metal mobilization from sediments across the entire study region.

Keywords

Sediment Metals Bioavailability Risk assessment Western Harbour Egypt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the colleagues in the National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries for their help and support during the collecting the samples from the Western Harbour. In addition, the thanks to the anonymous reviewer who constructive comments significantly improved this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    M.A.M. Abdallah, Trace metal behavior in Mediterranean-climate coastal bay: El-Mex Bay, Egypt and its coastal environment. Glob J Environ Res 2(1), 23–29 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A.M. Abdallah, N.B. El Sayed, M.A. Saad, Distribution and enrichment evaluation of heavy metals in El-Mex Bay using normalization models. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 16(7), 710–719 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.A.M. Abdallah, Chromium geochemistry in coastal environment of the Western Harbor, Egypt: water column, suspended matter and sediments. J. Coast. Conserv. Plan. Manag. 18, 1–10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A.M. Abdallah, Speciation of trace metals in coastal sediments of El-Mex bay south Mediterranean Sea–West of Alexandria (Egypt). Environ Monit Assess 132, 111–123 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Bortone, E. Arevalo, I. Deibel, Sediment and dredged material treatment. J Soil Sediments 4, 225–232 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.L. Demina, M.A. Levitan, N.,V. Politova, Speciation of some heavy metals in bottom sediments of the Ob and Yenisei estuarine zones. Geochem. Int. 44, 182–195 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.K. El-Sayed, S.K. El-Wakeel, A.E. Refaat, Factor analysis of sediments in the Alexandria western Harbor, Egypt. Oceanol. Acta 11, 1–11 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Guevara-Riba, A. Sahuquillo, R. Rubio, G. Rauret, Assessment of metal mobility in dredged harbour sediments from Barcelona, Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 321, 241–255 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.K. Gupta, K.Y. Chen, Partitioning of trace metals in selective chemical fractions of nearshore sediments. Environ. Lett. 10, 129–158 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.A. Huh, B.P. Finney, J.K. Stull, Anthropogenic inputs of several heavy metals to nearshore basins off Los Angeles. Prog Oceanogr 30, 335–351 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Kjeldsen, M.A. Barlaz, A.P. Rooker, A. Baun, A. Ledin, T.H. Christensen, Present and long-term composition, of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 297–336 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. McGrath, P.R. Paquin, D.M. Di Toro, Use of the SEM and AVS approach in predicting metal toxicity in sediments. Fact Sheet Environ. Risk Assess. 10, 1–6 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Nemati, N.K. Abu Bakar, M.R. Abas, Investigation of heavy metals mobility in shrimp aquaculture sludge—comparison of two sequential extraction procedures. Microchem. J. 91, 227–231 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.A. Passos, J.C. Alves, I.S. Dos Santos, J.H. Alves, C.B. Garcia, A.C.S. Costa, Assessment of trace metals contamination in estuarine sediments using a sequential extraction technique and principal component analysis. Microchem. J. 96, 50 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Pazos-Capeáns, M.C. Barciela-Alonso, P. Herbello-Hermelo, P. Bermejo-Barrera, Estuarine increase of chromium surface sediments: distribution, transport and time evolution. Microchem. J. 96, 362–370 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Perin, L. Craboledda, M. Lucchese, R. Cirillo, L. Dotta, M.L. Zanette, A.A. Orio, Heavy metal speciation in the sediments of Northern Adriatic sea—a new approach for environmental toxicity determination, in Heavy Metal in the Environment, vol 2, ed. by T.D. Lekkas (1985), pp. 454–466Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Prohić, G. Kniewald, Heavy metal distribution in recent sediments of the Krka river estuary—an example of sequential extraction analysis. Mar. Chem. 22, 279–297 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Rauret, Extraction procedures for the determination of heavy metals in contaminated soil and sediment. Talanta 46, 449–455 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Shumilin, V. Gordeev, G. Rodr, G. Figueroa, L. Demina, K. Choumiline, Assessment of geochemical mobility of metals in surface sediments of the Santa Rosalia mining region, Western Gulf of California. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 60, 8–25 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.R. Taylor, Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: a new table, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 28, 1273–1285 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Tessier, P.G.C. Campbell, M. Bisson, Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 51, 844–851 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. The Cuong, J.P. Obbard, Metal speciation in coastal marine sediments from Singapore using a modified BCR-sequential extraction procedure. Appl. Geochem. 21, 1335–1346 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Tüzen, Determination of trace metals in the River Yesilirmak sediments in Tokat, Turkey using sequential extraction procedure. Microchem. J. 74, 105–110 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    UN ESCAP, Commercial development of regional ports as logistics centres, transport and tourism division (TTD), in ST/ESCAP/2194, (United Nations, New York, 2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Z. Yang, Y. Wang, Z. Shen, J. Niu, Z. Tang, Distribution and speciation of heavy metals in sediments, from the mainstream, tributaries, and lakes of the Yangtze River catchment of Wuhan, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 166: 1186–1194 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C.K. Yap, A. Ismail, S.G. Tan, H. Omar, Correlation between speciation of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in sediments and their concentrations in total soft tissue of green-lipped mussel Perna viridis from the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Environ. Int. 28, 117–126 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Yuan, J. Shi, B. He, J. Liu, L. Liang, G. Jiang, Speciation of heavy metals in marine sediments from the East China Sea by ICP-MS with sequential extraction. Environ. Int. 30, 769–783 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Naval 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Pollution LabNational Institute of Oceanography and FisheriesAlexandriaEgypt
  2. 2.Marine Chemistry LabNational Institute of Oceanography and FisheriesSuezEgypt

Personalised recommendations