Advertisement

“It’s Not About Me No More”: Fatherhood and Mechanisms of Desistance Among At-Risk Men

  • Sarah BoonstoppelEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Work and marriage seem out of reach for many at-risk young men, but fatherhood is relatively common. The growing body of quantitative research on parenthood and desistance from crime is mixed, yet the changes associated with the transition to fatherhood align with the mechanisms implied by theories of desistance. To understand whether and how fatherhood relates to desistance and persistence in crime, I examine how fatherhood shapes cognitive shifts and routine activities among persisting and desisting men in early adulthood.

Methods

I analyze in-depth interviews with a subsample of 17 desisting and persisting fathers from the qualitative component of the Pathways to Desistance Study.

Results

The meanings and structures of fatherhood experiences were sensitive to local life circumstances, yet distinct patterns emerged. Desisting fathers experienced changes in thinking, including a sense of maturity and an increase in consideration for others. Shifts often emerged from parenting experiences after the birth of a child. Desisting fathers also described time with children in terms of structured childcare activities. Persisting fathers viewed themselves as failing to fulfill role obligations and as ignoring parenthood hook for change. Persisting fathers described time with children as “babysitting” and as oriented around leisure activities.

Conclusions

These findings provide insight into the lived experience of fatherhood among at-risk men. It highlights the intersection of situational and cognitive mechanisms implicated in the desistance process and supports contemporary theories of desistance and persistence.

Keywords

Desistance Fatherhood Routine activities Identity Cognitive shifts 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Ray Paternoster for his guidance on developing the ideas that became this study. Thanks also to Joel Powell, Katie Richardson Jens, Kjersten Nelson, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Funding Information

The author gratefully acknowledges the funding for the reported study from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, supplemental funding for Grant #2007-50220-PA-JL. The larger Pathways to Desistance Study was funded by the following government agencies and foundations: Arizona Governor’s Justice Commission, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Justice, Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William Penn Foundation, and William T. Grant Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Apel, R., & Horney, J. (2017). How and why does work matter? Employment conditions, routine activities, and crime among adult male offenders. Criminology, 55(2), 307–343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12134.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Augustine, J. M., Nelson, T., & Edin, K. (2009). Why do poor men have children? Fertility intentions among low-income unmarried U.S. fathers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334694.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachman, R., Kerrison, E. M., Paternoster, R., Smith, L., & O’Connell, D. (2016). The complex relationship between motherhood and desistance. Women and Criminal Justice, 26(3), 212–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1113153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bachu, A. (1996). Fertility of American men. Population division working paper no.14. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker, H. S. (1963). The outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51(2), 399–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2018). Desistance from offending in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blokland, A. A. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstance on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43, 1203–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00037.x.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowman, P. J., & Forman, T. A. (1997). Instrumental and expressive family roles among African American fathers. In R. J. Taylor, J. S. Jackson, & L. M. Chatter (Eds.), Family life in Black America (pp. 216–247). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bushway, S. D. (1998). The impact of arrest on the job stability of young white American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4), 454–479.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427898035004005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlsson, C. (2012). Using “turning points” to understand processes of change in offending. British Journal of Criminology, 52(August 2011), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr062.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christiansen, S. L., & Palkovitz, R. (2001). Why the “good provider” role still matters: providing as a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 84–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022001004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daly, K. J., Ashbourne, L., & Brown, J. L. (2012). A reorientation of worldview: children’s influence on fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 34(10), 1401–1424.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12459016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denzin, N. K. (2002). The interpretive process. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 349–366). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doherty, E. E., & Bersani, B. E. (2016). Understanding the mechanisms of desistance at the intersection of race, gender, and neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(5), 681–710.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816632573.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyer, W. J. (2005). Prison, fathers, and identity: a theory of how incarceration affects men’s paternal identity. Fathering, 3(3), 201–219.  https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0303.201.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dyer, W. J., Pleck, J. H., & McBride, B. A. (2012). Imprisoned fathers and their family relationships: a 40-year review from a multi-theory view. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(March), 20–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00111.x.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eggebeen, D. J., & Knoester, C. (2001). Does fatherhood matter for men? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 381–393.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00381.x.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. Toronto: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fader, F. J. (2013). Falling back: incarceration and transitions to adulthood among urban youth. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gauthier, A. H., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2002). The transition to adulthood: a time use perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580(1), 153–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620258000107.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giordano, P. C. (2016). Mechanisms underlying the desistance process: reflections on ‘a theory of cognitive transformation’. In S. Farrall, J. Shapland, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global perspectives on desistance: reviewing what we know and looking to the future (pp. 11–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1086/343191.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giordano, P. C., Schroeder, R. D., & Cernkovich, S. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: a neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1603–1661.  https://doi.org/10.1086/512710.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giordano, P. C., Seffrin, P. M., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Parenthood and crime: the role of wantedness, relationships with partners, and SES. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(5), 405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCRIMJUS.2011.05.006.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giordano, P. C., Johnson, W. L., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Minter, M. D. (2015). Intimate partner violence in young adulthood: narratives of persistence and desistance. Criminology, 53(3), 330–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12073.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glauber, R. (2008). Race and gender in families and at work: the fatherhood wage premium. Gender & Society, 22(1), 8–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243207311593.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goffman, A. (2009). On the run: wanted men in a Philadelphia ghetto. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 339–357.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400301.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1995). Young people and crime. Research study 145. London.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hamer, J. F. (1998). The definition of fatherhood: in the words of never-married African American custodial mothers and the noncustodial fathers of their children. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25(4), 81–104.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hughes, M. (1998). Turning points in the lives of young inner-city men forgoing destructive criminal behaviors: a qualitative study. Social Work Research, 22(3), 143–151.  https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/22.3.143.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ihinger-Tallman, M., Pasley, K., & Buehler, C. (1993). Developing a middle-range theory of father involvement postdivorce. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 550–571.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014004005.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kerr, D. C. R., Capaldi, D. M., Owen, L. D., Weisner, M., & Pears, K. C. (2011). Changes in at-risk American men’s crime and substance use trajectories following fatherhood. The Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 1101–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00864.x.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knoester, C., & Eggebeen, D. J. (2006). The effects of the transition to parenthood and subsequent children on men’s well-being and social participation. Journal of Family Issues., 27, 1532–1560.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Knoester, C., Petts, R. J., & Eggebeen, D. J. (2007). Commitments to fathering and the well-being and social participation of new, disadvantaged fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 991–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00426.x.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lamb, M. E., & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (2004). The role of the father: an introduction. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 1–31). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Landers, M. D., Mitchell, O., & Coates, E. E. (2015). Teenage fatherhood as a potential turning point in the lives of delinquent youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(6), 1685–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9971-y.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    LaRossa, R. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations, 37(4), 451.  https://doi.org/10.2307/584119.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice: A Review of the Research, 28, 1–69.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807087640.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Massoglia, M., & Uggen, C. (2007). Subjective desistance and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 90–103.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206298950.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mitchell, O., Landers, M., & Morales, M. (2017). The contingent effects of fatherhood on offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice., 43, 603–626.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9418-2.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Monsbakken, C. W., Lyngstad, T. H., & Skardhamar, T. (2013). Crime and the transition to parenthood the role of sex and relationship context. British Journal of Criminology, 53, 129–148.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs052.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Piquero, A. R., Besana, M., Fagan, J., Schubert, C., & Cauffman, E. (2010). Trajectories of desistance and continuity in antisocial behavior following court adjudication among serious adolescent offenders. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 453–475.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941000057X.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Na, C. (2016). The consequences of fatherhood transition among disadvantaged male offenders: does timing matter? Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology Life Course Criminology, 2, 182–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0022-1.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31(3), 327–362.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nelson, T. J. (2004). Low-income fathers. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 427–451.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095947.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nomaguchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs and rewards of children: the effects of becoming a parent on adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 356–374.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2096397.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Paternoster, R. (2017). Happenings, acts, and actions: articulating the meaning and implications of human agency for criminology. Journal of Developmental & Life-Course Criminology, 3, 350–372.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Bushway, S., Kerrison, E., & O’Connell, D. (2015). Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(3), 209–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-015-0013-2.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Piquero, A. R., Monahan, K. C., Glasheen, C., Schubert, C. A., & Mulvey, E. P. (2013). Does time matter? Comparing trajectory concordance and covariate association using time-based and age-based assessments. Crime & Delinquency, 59(5), 738–763.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712459491.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Roy, K. (2004). You can’t eat love: constructing provider role expectations for low-income and working-class fathers. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 2(3), 253–276.  https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0203.253.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Roy, K., & Dyson, O. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 3(3), 289–310.  https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0303.289.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., Chassin, L., & Knight, G. P. (2004). Operational lessons from the Pathways to Desistance Project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237–255.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004265875.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shannon, S. K. S., & Abrams, L. S. (2007). Juvenile offenders as fathers: perceptions of fatherhood, crime, and becoming an adult. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(2), 183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3616.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Siennick, S. E., & Osgood, D. W. (2008). A review of research on the impact on crime of transitions to adult roles. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: a synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 161–187). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71165-2_5.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tremblay, M. D., Sutherland, J. E., & Day, D. M. (2017). Fatherhood and delinquency: an examination of risk factors and offending patterns associated with fatherhood status among serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 677–689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0590-7.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2013). Redefining relationships: explaining the countervailing consequences of paternal incarceration for parenting. American Sociological Review, 78(6), 949–979.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413505589.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32(2), 339–366.  https://doi.org/10.2307/827766.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Uggen, C., & Thompson, M. (2003). The socioeconomic determinants of ill-gotten gains: within-person changes in drug use and illegal earnings. American Journal of Sociology., 109, 146–185.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Uggen, C., & Wakefield, S. (2005). Young adults reentering the community from the criminal justice system: challenges to adulthood. In D. W. Osgood, E. M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. R. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: the transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations (pp. 114–144). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Visher, C. A. (2013). Incarcerated fathers. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 9–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411418105.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Waller, M. R. (2009). Family man in the other america: new opportunities, motivations, and supports for paternal caregiving. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 156–176.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334372.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Warin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C., & Langford, W. (1999). Fathers, work, and family life. London.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01246.x.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wilkinson, D. L., Magora, A., Garcia, M., & Khurana, A. (2009). Fathering at the margins of society. Journal of Family Issues, 30(7), 945–967.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09332354.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Yule, C., Paré, P.-P., & Gartner, R. (2015). An examination of the local life circumstances of female offenders: mothering, illegal earnings and drug use. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 248–269.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu073.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ziegler, J. A., Kuhl, D. C., Swisher, R. R., & Chavez, J. M. (2017). Parenthood residency status and criminal desistance across neighborhood contexts. Deviant Behavior, 38(1), 17–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1189758.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2014). Criminality and family formation. Crime & Delinquency, 60(8), 1209–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712441745.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice and Political ScienceNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations