Advertisement

Equifinality and Desistance: Which Pathways to Desistance Are the Most Traveled in Young Adulthood?

  • Gary SweetenEmail author
  • Natasha Khade
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

The desistance literature identifies many competing explanations for desistance. Equifinality, Cicchetti and Rogosch (Dev Psychopathol 8:597–600, 1996), refers to the idea that a diversity of pathways can lead to the same end result. Embracing this perspective, we shift our focus from identifying effects of causes to identifying the causes of an effect, Sampson et al. (Criminol Public Policy 12:587–616, 2013): desistance. That is, among individuals who have desisted from crime, what proportion have experienced each of the proposed explanations of desistance? Are these proportions any different from non-desisters or other offending groups? In this way, we provide evidence for the relative importance of competing explanations for desistance.

Methods

Using Pathways to Desistance, we estimate group-based trajectory models of offending. We use this model to identify desisters and persisters. We then compare these two groups on theoretically motivated constructs.

Results

We find that psychosocial development, associations with deviant peers, and the social rewards of crime change more rapidly among desisters than persisters. Many desistance processes are present among persisting groups, but at a slower rate of change compared to desisters.

Conclusions

Embracing the equifinality of desistance would open up new methodological approaches and new ways of organizing the literature, and would have important implications for theoretical development and policy applications.

Keywords

Desistance Persistence Equifinality 

References

  1. 1.
    Akers, R. L. (1977). Deviant behavior: a social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: a social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structures: a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: a direct test of Moffitt’s maturity gap thesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1176–1185.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bersani, B. E., & Doherty, E. E. (2013). When the ties that bind unwind: examining the enduring and situational processes of change behind the marriage effect. Criminology, 51(2), 399–433.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blokland, A. A. J., Nagin, D., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). Life span offending trajectories of a Dutch conviction cohort. Criminology, 43(4), 919–954.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blumstein, A., Canela-Caho, J. A., & Cohen, J. (1993). Filtered sampling from populations with heterogeneous event frequencies. Management Science, 39(7), 886–899.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Introduction: studying criminal careers. Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals, 1, 12-30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bushway, S. D., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L. M., Cauffman, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39(2), 491–516.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bushway, S. D., Paternoster, R., & Brame, R. (2003a). Examining the prevalence of criminal desistance. Criminology, 41(2), 423–448.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bushway, S. D., Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003b). Desistance as a developmental process: a comparison of static and dynamic approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(2), 129–153.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im) maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(6), 741–760.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cauffman, E., & Woolard, J. (1999). The future outlook inventory. Instrument developed for the MacArthur Juvenile Competence Study. Unpublished measure available at http://secc.rti.org/display.cfm.
  15. 15.
    Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Craig, J. M., Diamond, B., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Marriage as an intervention in the lives of criminal offenders, In Effective interventions in the lives of criminal offenders (pp. 19–37). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeLisi, M. (2014). Equifinality, multifinality, and immorality in a life of crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(3), 263–264.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Egeland, B., Pianta, R., & Ogawa, J. (1996). Early behavior problems: pathways to mental disorders in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 8(4), 735–749.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esbensen, F. A., & Elliott, D. S. (1994). Continuity and discontinuity in illicit drug use: patterns and antecedents. Journal of Drug Issues, 24(1), 75–97.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forrest, W. (2014). Cohabitation, relationship quality, and desistance from crime. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 539–556.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Annual research review: a developmental psychopathology approach to understanding callous-unemotional traits in children and adolescents with serious conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(6), 532–548.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gelman, A. & Imbens, G. (2013). Why as why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions. NBER Working Paper 19614.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giordano, P. C., Schroeder, R. D., & Cernkovich, S. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: a neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1603–1661.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Glueck, S. (1956). Theory and fact in criminology. British Journal of Delinquency, 7, 92.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Juvenile Court Judges Journal, 2, 32.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greenberger, E., Josselson, R., Knerr, C., & Knerr, B. (1974). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 127–143.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greenberger, E., & Sørensen, A. B. (1974). Toward a concept of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 3(4), 329–358.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harrington, R., Rutter, M., & Fombonne, E. (1996). Developmental pathways in depression: multiple meanings, antecedents, and endpoints. Development and Psychopathology, 8(4), 601–616.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 655–673.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kazemian, L. (2007). Desistance from crime: theoretical, empirical, methodological, and policy considerations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kreager, D., Ragan, D. T., Nguyen, H., & Staff, J. (2016). When onset meets desistance: cognitive transformation and adolescent marijuana experimentation. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(2), 135–161.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1–69.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laub, J. H., Sampson, R. J., & Sweeten, G. A. (2006). Assessing Sampson and Laub’s life-course theory of crime. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory, Taking stock: the status of criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 313–333). Piscataway, NJ, US: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 737–762.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1654–1668.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., et al. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 213–236.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Piquero, A. R., Besana, M., Fagan, J., Schubert, C., & Cauffman, E. (2010). Trajectories of desistance and continuity in antisocial behavior following court adjudication among serious adolescent offenders. Development and Psychopathology, 22(2), 453–475.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Na, C., Paternoster, R., & Bachman, R. (2015). Within-individual change in arrests in a sample of serious offenders: the role of identity. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(4), 385–410.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1103-1156.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Bushway, S., Kerrison, E., & O’Connell, D. (2015). Human agency and explanations of criminal desistance: arguments for a rational choice theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 1(3), 209–235.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Kerrison, E., O’Connell, D., & Smith, L. (2016). Desistance from crime and identity: an empirical test with survival time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1204–1224.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Piquero, A. R., & Brezina, T. (2001). Testing Moffitt’s account of adolescence-limited delinquency. Criminology, 39(2), 353–370.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Piquero, A. R., Monahan, K. C., Glasheen, C., Schubert, C. A., & Mulvey, E. P. (2012). Does time matter? Comparing trajectory concordance and covariate association using time-based and age-based assessments. Crime & Delinquency, 59(5), 738–763.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Piquero, A. R., Sullivan, C. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Assessing differences between short-term, high-rate offenders and long-term, low-rate offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1309–1329.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Thomas Winfree Jr, L., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: a meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rocque, M. (2017). Desistance from crime: new advances in theory and research. Springer.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rocque, M., Posick, C., & Paternoster, R. (2016). Identities through time: an exploration of identity change as a cause of desistance. Justice Quarterly, 33(1), 45–72.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rodermond, E., Kruttschnitt, C., Slotboom, A. M., & Bijleveld, C. C. (2016). Female desistance: a review of the literature. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555–592.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2016). Turning points and the future of life-course criminology: reflections on the 1986 Criminal Careers Report. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(3), 321–335.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sampson, R. J., Winship, C., & Knight, C. (2013). Translating causal claims. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(4), 587–616.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sivertsson, F., & Carlsson, C. (2015). Continuity, change, and contradictions: risk and agency in criminal careers to age 59. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(4), 382–411.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Skardhamar, T., Savolainen, J., Aase, K. N., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2015). Does marriage reduce crime? Crime and Justice, 44(1), 385–446.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Steinberg, L. D., Cauffman, E., & Monahan, K. (2015). Psychosocial maturity and desistance from crime in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20(3), 249.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sweeten, G., Pyrooz, D. C., & Piquero, A. R. (2013). Disengaging from gangs and desistance from crime. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 469–500.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: a typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 381–417.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wolfe, D. A., & Mash, E. J. (Eds.). (2006). Behavioral and emotional disorders in adolescents: Nature, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations