Tropical Plant Pathology

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 503–510 | Cite as

Effects of cacao swollen shoot virus mild strains N1 and SS365B on growth and yield of cacao - a follow-up report

  • O. DomfehEmail author
  • G. A. Ameyaw
  • H. K. Dzahini-Obiatey
Original Article


The cumulative effects of cacao swollen shoot virus (CSSV) mild strains N1 and SS365B on growth and yield of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) were evaluated in a 12-year field trial at the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG). The treatments consisted of mixed hybrid cacao plants inoculated with N1 or SS365B prior to sowing and a non-inoculated control. Growth of mild strain-inoculated cacao plants did not differ significantly from that of non-inoculated plants. However, growth of N1-inoculated cacao plants was significantly higher than that of SS365B-inoculated ones. The yield of N1-inoculated cacao plants did not differ significantly from that of the non-inoculated plants. However, yield of SS365B-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to N1-inoculated and the non-inoculated plants. In comparison with the non-inoculated control, yield was 77% and 20% lower in SS365B- and N1-inoculated cacao plants, respectively. Virus indexing conducted over a period of six months on randomly collected budwood from the field revealed the presence of mixed infection of CSSV strains in the field. Cacao tree mortality did not differ among the treatments. These results provide further evidence that the CSSV mild strain N1 is milder in its effect on cacao growth and yield than SS365B and suggest that the former would be a more suitable candidate for cross protection in cacao.


Theobroma cacao Cacao Cacao swollen shoot virus Field experiment Growth Long-term Mild strain Yield 



The authors wish to thank Kai Johnson (of blessed memory), Henry Oboom, Mawuli Adoblanui, Bright Klu Quarshie, Collins Asomadu, Adolf B. Yiadom and Bernard Armooh (all of CRIG) for providing technical support. The authors are also grateful to Mr. Curt Doetkott, a consulting statistician at the Information Technology Services, North Dakota State University, for analyzing the data, and to Dr. Frank Owusu-Ansah (Biometrician, Social Science and Statistics Unit - CRIG) for support with data management. Funding for this work was provided by CRIG. This manuscript (CRIG/05/2019/040/005) is published with the kind permission of the Executive Director of CRIG.

Author contributions

The experiment was designed, implemented and the manuscript written by OD. GAA and HKD took care of maintenance of the trial at different periods when OD was not at post.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All co-authors have given consent to the publication of this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The study did not involve human participants or animals.


  1. Abrokwah F, Dzahini-Obiatey H, Galyuon I, Osae-Awuku F, Muller E (2016) Geographical distribution of cacao swollen shoot virus molecular variability in Ghana. Plant Disease 100:2011–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameyaw GA, Domfeh O, Dzahini-Obiatey H, Ollennu LAA, Owusu GK (2016) Appraisal of cocoa swollen shoot virus (CSSV) mild isolates for cross protection of cocoa against severe strains in Ghana. Plant Disease 100:810–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andres C, Blaser WJ, Dzahini-Obiatey HK, Ameyaw GA, Domfeh O, Awiagah MA, Gattinger A, Schneider M, Offei SK, Six J (2018) Agroforestry systems can mitigate the severity of cocoa swollen shoot virus disease. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 252:83–92Google Scholar
  4. Andres C, Gattinger A, Dzahini-Obiatey HK, Blaser WJ, Offei SK, Six J (2017) Combatting cocoa swollen shoot virus disease: what do we know? Crop Protection 98:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cours G (1951) Le manioc à Madagascar. Mémoires de l.Institut Scientifique de Madagascar Série B Biologie Végétale 3: 203- 400.Google Scholar
  6. Crowdy SH, Posnette AF (1947) Virus diseases of cacao in West Africa. II. Cross-immunity experiments with viruses 1A, 1B and 1C. Annals of Applied Biology 34:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domfeh O, Ameyaw GA, Dzahini-Obiatey HK (2018) The effects of mild cacao swollen shoot virus strains N1 and SS356B on growth and yield of cacao. Journal of General Plant Pathology 84:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Domfeh O, Dzahini-Obiatey H, Ameyaw GAA, Anochie E (2010) The effect of CSSV mild strains on growth and yield of cocoa. Annual report, cocoa research Institute of Ghana, 2009/2010. CRIG, Tafo. pp. 92–93Google Scholar
  9. McKinney HH (1929) Mosaic diseases in the Canary Islands, West Africa, and Gibraltar. Journal of Agricultural Research 39:557–578Google Scholar
  10. Muller E (2016) Cacao swollen shoot virus (CSSV): history, biology, and genome. In: Bailey BA, Meinhardt LW (eds) Cacao diseases. Springer International Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Muller GW, Costa AS (1977) Tristeza control in Brazil by pre-immunization with mild strains. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture 3: 868-872Google Scholar
  12. Ollennu LAA, Osei-Bonsu K, Ameyaw GA, Domfeh O, Anochie E (2007) The effect of CSSV mild strains on growth and yield of cocoa. Annual Report, Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 2004/2005. CRIG, Tafo. pp. 93–95Google Scholar
  13. Ollennu LAA, Anochie E (2006) The effects of CSSV mild strains on growth and yield of cocoa. Annual report, cocoa research Institute of Ghana, 2002/2003. CRIG, Tafo. pp. 92Google Scholar
  14. Ollennu LAA, Owusu GK, Dzahini-Obiatey H (1999) Recent studies of mild strain cross-protection with cocoa swollen shoot virus. Journal of the Ghana Science Association 2: 5-11.Google Scholar
  15. Ollennu LAA, Hughes J’A, Owusu GK (1996) Mild strain cross-protection of cocoa against cocoa swollen shoot badnavirus. Tropical Science 36:116–128Google Scholar
  16. Ollennu LAA, Owusu GK (2002) The use of cocoa seedlings for field evaluation of mild strain protection against cocoa swollen shoot badnavirus. Journal of the Ghana Science Association 4:14–18Google Scholar
  17. Ollennu LAA, Owusu GK (2003) Field evaluation of the protective capability of CSSV mild strain Nl against severe strain new Juaben (1A) isolate. Journal of the Ghana Science Association 36:3–12Google Scholar
  18. Owor B, Legg JP, Okao-Okuja G, Obonyo R, Ogenga-Latigo W (2004) The effect of cassava mosaic geminiviruses on symptom severity, growth and root yield of a cassava mosaic virus disease-susceptible cultivar in Uganda. Annals of Applied Biology 145:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Owusu GK (1983) The cocoa swollen shoot virus problem in Ghana. In: Plumb RT, Thresh JM (eds) Plant Virus Epidemiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 73–83Google Scholar
  20. Posnette AF (1947) Virus diseases of cacao in West Africa. I. Cacao viruses 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D. Annals of Applied Biology 34:388–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Posnette AF, Strickland AH (1948) Virus diseases of cacao in West Africa. III. Technique of insect transmission. Annals of Applied Biology 35:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Posnette AF (1951) Virus research at the west African cacao research institute, Tafo, Gold Coast. Tropical Agriculture 28:133–142Google Scholar
  23. Posnette AF, Todd JMA (1951) Virus disease of cacao in West Africa. VIII. The search for virus resistant cacao. Annals of Applied Biology 38:785–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posnette AF, Todd JMA (1955) Virus diseases of cacao in West Africa. IX. Strain variation and interference in virus IA. Annals of Applied Biology 43:433–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rast ATHB (1972) MII-16, an artificial symptomless mutant of tobacco mosaic virus for seedling inoculation of tomato crops. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 78:110–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rezende JAM, Pacheco DA (1998) Control of papaya ringspot virus-type W in zucchini squash by cross-protection in Brazil. Plant Disease 82:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute (2013) SAS/STAT 13.1 Users’ Guide. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  28. Thresh JM (1958) The control of cacao swollen shoot disease in West Africa - a review of the present situation. Technical bulletin no. 4. West African Cocoa Research Institute, Ibadan. pp. 1–36Google Scholar
  29. Thresh JM, Owusu GK (1986) The control of cocoa swollen shoot disease in Ghana: an evaluation of eradication procedures. Crop Protection 5:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thresh JM, Owusu GK, Boamah A, Lockwood G (1988) Ghanaian cocoa varieties and swollen shoot virus. Crop Protection 7:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh SD, Gonsalves D (1984) Evaluation of induced mutants of papaya ringspot virus for control by cross protection. Phytopathology 74:1086–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. You BJ, Chiang CH, Chen LF, Su WC, Yeh SD (2005) Engineered mild strains of papaya ringspot virus for broader cross protection in cucurbits. Phytopathology 95:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cocoa Research Institute of GhanaNew Tafo-AkimGhana

Personalised recommendations