Assessing Learning Outcomes of Course Descriptors Containing Object Oriented Programming Concepts
This study follows well-published educational criteria for assessing the quality of learning outcomes and investigates how these criteria are applied to descriptors of courses that include object oriented programming concepts. These quality criteria aim to ensure that learning outcomes are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-scaled. The study examined course descriptors from all universities in New Zealand and found a significant gap between the published criteria and the learning outcomes—it is clear that learning outcomes are widely open to interpretation and do not meet the criteria. There is a minimal level of detail provided in these outcomes that are insufficient to satisfy the stated criteria. This study then presents a new and more detailed implementation of outcomes augmented with assessment structure and marking criteria to show that adding more detail significantly increases the complexity of course descriptors. This highlights the need for robust discussions between the writers of course descriptors who look for simplicity and flexibility and quality assessors who expect precision and specifics.
KeywordsCourse design Learning outcome Assessment structure Marking criteria Object oriented programming
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their help and valuable comments.
- Adam, S. (2006). An introduction to learning outcomes. A consideration of the nature, function and position of learning outcomes in the creation of the European higher education area. In E. Froment, J. Kohler, L. Purser, & L.Wilson (Eds.), EUA Bologna handbook – Making Bologna work (article B.2.3-1) (pp. 1–24). Berlin: Raabe Verlag.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://biblioteca.ucv.cl/site/colecciones/manuales_u/49657968-Teaching-for-Quality-Learning-at-University.pdf.
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Bresciani, M. (2013). Writing Measurable and Meaningful Outcomes. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://www.uwlax.edu/learningoutcomes/edreading/WritingOutcomesBrescianiArticle.pdf.
- Chatterjee, D., & Corral, J. (2017). How to write well-defined learning objectives. The journal of education in perioperative medicine: JEPM, 19(4), 1.Google Scholar
- Dickson, N., Howell, B., & Woodland, I. (2016). Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) of The Queen's Foundation for Ecumenical Theological Education. Retrieved 06 19, from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/reports/the-queens-foundation-for-ecumenical-theological-education-her-ap-16.pdf?sfvrsn=b8b1f481_4.
- Grimsby Institute Group. (2013). Assessment Terminology, Criteria and Marking Schemes. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://www.grimsby.ac.uk/higherEducation/documents/quality/assessmentTerminology.pdf.
- Jenkins, A., & Unwin, D. (2001). How to write learning outcomes. Retrieved 06 19, from https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/faculty-matters/How%20to%20write%20student%20learning%20outcomes.pdf.
- Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. Cork: University College Cork.Google Scholar
- Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S. O., & Kinzie, J. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in US colleges and universities. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).Google Scholar
- Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Moon, J. (2002). The module & programme development handbook: A practical guide to linking. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Moon, J. (2007). Linking Levels, Learning Outcomes and Assessment. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/qualification/040701-02Linking_Levels_plus_ass_crit-Moon.pdf.
- Osters, S., & Tiu, S. (2003). Writing Measurable Learning Outcomes. 3rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference. College Station, TX. Retrieved from http://www.gavilan.edu/research/spd/Writing-Measurable-Learning-Outcomes.pdf.
- Otter, S. (1995). Learning outcomes in higher education. Outcomes, learning and the curriculum: Implications for NVQs, GNVQs and other qualifications (p 273). London: Psychology press.Google Scholar
- Race, P. (2001). The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A practical guide to learning, teaching and assessment. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Reiser, R. A. (2017). Eight trends affecting the field of instructional design and technology: Opportunities and challenges. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Spiller, D. (2011). Assessment Tasks to Promote Learning. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu/pdf/booklets/10_AssessmentTasks.pdf.
- Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment: Setting and Marking Assessment tasks. Retrieved 09 18, 2013, from http://www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu/pdf/booklets/16_AssessmentSettingandMarking.pdf.