Influence of Structure and Microstructure on Deformation Localization and Crack Growth in NiTi Shape Memory Alloys

  • Partha P. Paul
  • Margaret Fortman
  • Harshad M. Paranjape
  • Peter M. Anderson
  • Aaron P. Stebner
  • L. Catherine Brinson
SPECIAL ISSUE: A TRIBUTE TO PROF. JAN VAN HUMBEECK – A LIFETIME of CONTRIBUTIONS to UNDERSTANDING MARTENSITE, INVITED PAPER
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Porous NiTi shape memory alloys have applications in the biomedical and aerospace fields. Recent developments in metal additive manufacturing have made fabrication of near-net-shape porous products with complicated geometries feasible. There have also been developments in tailoring site-specific microstructures in metals using additive manufacturing. Inspired by these developments, we explore two related mechanistic phenomena in a simplified representation of porous shape memory alloys. First, we computationally elucidate the connection between pore geometry, stress concentration around pores, grain orientation, and strain-band formation during tensile loading of NiTi. Using this, we present a method to engineer local crystal orientations to mitigate the stress concentrations around the pores. Second, we experimentally document the growth of cracks around pores in a cyclically loaded superelastic NiTi specimen. In the areas of stress concentration around holes, cracks are seen to grow in large grains with [1 1 0] oriented along the tensile axis. This combined work shows the potential of local microstructural engineering in reducing stress concentration and increasing resistance to propagation of cracks in porous SMAs, potentially increasing the fatigue life of porous SMA components.

Keywords

Nickel titanium Shape memory alloys Electron back scattering diffraction Crystal plasticity Additive manufacturing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the use of NUANCE (NSF ECCS-1542205), MatCI and CLAMMP (NSF DMR-1121262) facilities at Northwestern University for electron microscopy and mechanical testing and the computing facilities at XSEDE (Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment, NSF ACI-1053575). Financial support for this work was provided by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science (Grant No. DE-SC0010594). The authors thank Dr. Sivom Manchiraju (formerly at The Ohio State University) for making available the Abaqus UMAT code used in this work, and Ms. Amy Brice (Colorado School of Mines) for helping with proof-reading and formatting of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bansiddhi A, Sargeant TD, Stupp SI, Dunand DC (2008) Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review. Acta Biomater 4(4):773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartl DJ, Lagoudas DC (2007) Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G 221(4):535–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bram M, Köhl M, Buchkremer HP, Stöver D (2011) Mechanical properties of highly porous NiTi alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 20(4–5):522–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dadbakhsh S, Speirs M, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth J-P (2016) Laser additive manufacturing of bulk and porous shape-memory NiTi alloys: From processes to potential biomedical applications. MRS Bull 41:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elahinia M, Moghaddam NS, Andani MT, Amerinatanzi A, Bimber BA, Hamilton RF (2016) Fabrication of NiTi through additive manufacturing: a review. Prog Mater Sci 83:630–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paul PP, Paranjape HM, Amin-Ahmadi B, Stebner AP, Dunand DC, Brinson LC (2017) Effect of machined feature size relative to the microstructural size on the superelastic performance in polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 706:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kobryn PA, Semiatin SL (2001) The laser additive manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V. JOM 53:40–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins P, Brice D, Samimi P, Ghamarian I, Fraser H (2016) Microstructural control of additively manufactured metallic materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 46:63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dehoff RR, Kirka MM, Sames WJ, Bilheux H, Tremsin AS, Lowe LE, Babu SS (2015) Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Tech 31:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saedi S, Turabi AS, Andani MT, Moghaddam NS, Elahinia M, Karaca HE (2017) Texture, aging, and superelasticity of selective laser melting fabricated Ni-rich NiTi alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 686:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franco BE, Ma J, Loveall B, Tapia GA, Karayagiz K, Liu J, Elwany A, Arroyave R, Karaman I (2017) A sensory material approach for reducing variability in additively manufactured metal parts. Sci Rep 7:3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang X, Speirs M, Kustov S, Vrancken B, Li X, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2018) Selective laser melting produced layer-structured NiTi shape memory alloys with high damping properties and elinvar effect. Scr Mater 146:246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niendorf T, Lackmann J, Gorny B, Maier H (2011) In situ characterization of martensite variant formation in nickel–titanium shape memory alloy under biaxial loading. Scr Mater 65:915–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohl M, Bram M, Moser A, Buchkremer H, Beck T, Stover D (2011) Characterization of porous, net-shaped NiTi alloy regarding its damping and energy-absorbing capacity. Mater Sci Eng A 528:2454–2462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carroll JD, Abuzaid WZ, Lambros J, Sehitoglu H (2013) On the interactions between strain accumulation, microstructure, and fatigue crack behavior. Int J Fract 180:223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Creuziger A, Bartol LJ, Gall K, Crone WC (2008) Fracture in single crystal NiTi. J Mech Phys Solids 56:2896–2905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Y, Ojha A, Patriarca L, Sehitoglu H (2015) Fatigue crack growth fundamentals in shape memory alloys. Shape Mem Superelast 1:18–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daymond MR, Young ML, Almer JD, Dunand DC (2007) Strain and texture evolution during mechanical loading of a crack tip in martensitic shape-memory NiTi. Acta Mater 55:3929–3942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson SW, Mehta A, Pelton AR, Ritchie RO (2007) Evolution of crack-tip transformation zones in superelastic nitinol subjected to in situ fatigue: a fracture mechanics and synchrotron X-ray micro diffraction analysis. Acta Mater 55(18):6198–6207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jape S, Baxevanis T, Lagoudas DC (2017) On the fracture toughness and stable crack growth in shape memory alloy actuators in the presence of transformation-induced plasticity. Int J Fract 209(1–2):117–130Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baxevanis T, Lagoudas DC (2015) Fracture mechanics of shape memory alloys: review and perspectives. Int J Fract 191:191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manchiraju S, Anderson PM (2010) Coupling between martensitic phase transformations and plasticity: a microstructure-based finite element model. Int J Plast 26:1508–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhattacharya K (2003) Microstructure of martensite: why it forms and how it gives rise to the shape-memory effect. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richards AW, Lebensohn RA, Bhattacharya K (2013) Interplay of martensitic phase transformation and plastic slip in polycrystals. Acta Mater 61:4384–4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Javid F, Liu J, Rafsanjani A, Schaenzer M, Pham MQ, Backman D, Yandt S, Innes MC, Booth-Morrison C, Gerendas M, Scarinci T, Shanian A, Bertoldi K (2017) On the design of porous structures with enhanced fatigue life. Ext Mech Lett 16:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gall K, Yang N, Sehitoglu H, Chumlyakov YI (2001) Fracture of precipitated NiTi shape memory alloys. Int J Fract 109:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vaidyanathan R, Dunand DC, Ramamurty U (2000) Fatigue crack-growth in shape-memory NiTi and NiTi–TiC composites. Mater Sci Eng A 289:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahadi A, Sun Q (2016) Grain size dependence of fracture toughness and crack-growth resistance of superelastic NiTi. Scr Mater 113:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    LePage WS, Ahadi A, Lenthe WC, Sun Q, Pollock TM, Shaw JA, Daly SH (2017) Grain size effects on NiTi shape memory alloy fatigue crack growth. J Mater Res 33(2):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Partha P. Paul
    • 1
  • Margaret Fortman
    • 2
  • Harshad M. Paranjape
    • 3
  • Peter M. Anderson
    • 4
  • Aaron P. Stebner
    • 3
  • L. Catherine Brinson
    • 5
  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsLake Forest CollegeLake ForestUSA
  3. 3.Mechanical EngineeringColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  4. 4.Materials Science and EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  5. 5.Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations