Advertisement

Tax reform and fiscal space in developing countries

  • Sèna Kimm GnangnonEmail author
  • Jean-François Brun
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates empirically the effect of tax reform on fiscal space in developing countries. The analysis has used an unbalanced panel dataset comprising 99 developing countries (of which 37 Least developed countries—LDCs) over the period 1980–2015. It has shown empirical evidence that tax reform is associated with greater fiscal space in developing countries, with this positive impact being particularly higher for LDCs than for the set of other countries in the full sample. Furthermore, the higher the degree of openness to international trade, the greater is the positive effect of tax reform on fiscal space. In light of the importance of securing greater fiscal space to finance development needs, policymakers in developing countries should pursue their tax reform in the context of greater trade openness, notably with the assistance of both bilateral partners (developed countries) and relevant international institutions.

Keywords

Tax reform De Facto Fiscal Space Developing countries 

JEL Classification

H20 H30 E62 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous Reviewers for their useful comments on this article. The latter represents the personal opinions of individual staff members of the WTO and is not meant to represent the position or opinions of the WTO or its Members, nor the official position of any staff members. Any errors or omissions are the fault of the authors.

References

  1. Adedeji, O., Ahokpossi, C., Battiati, C., & Farid, M. (2016). A probabilistic approach to fiscal space and prudent debt level: Application to low-income developing countries. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/163, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Ağca, S., & Celasun, O. (2012). Sovereign debt and corporate borrowing costs in emerging markets. Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aizenman, J. & Jinjarak, Y. (2010). De facto Fiscal Space and fiscal stimulus: Definition and assessment. NBER Working Paper No. 16539, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Aizenman, J., Jinjarak, Y., Nguyen, K. H. T., & Park, D. (2019). Fiscal space and government-spending and tax-rate cyclicality patterns: A cross-country comparison, 1960-2016. Journal of Macroeconomics, 60, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auerbach, A. J. (1996). Measuring the impact of tax reform. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 665–673.Google Scholar
  7. Balamatsias, P. (2017). Democracy and taxation. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2017-100, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economicsejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2017-100. Accessed 22 Nov 2017.
  8. Barro, R., & Furman, J. (2018). Macroeconomic Effects of the 2017 Tax Reform. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2018.Google Scholar
  9. Barroy, H., Kutzin, J., Tandon, A., Kurowski, C., Lie, G., Borowitz, M., et al. (2018). Assessing Fiscal space for health in the SDG era: a different story. Health Systems & Reform, 4(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baunsgaard, T., & Keen, M. (2010). Tax revenue and (or?) trade liberalization. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benno, T. (2003). To Evade or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 3, 283–302.Google Scholar
  12. Bird, R. M., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2008). Tax effort in developing countries and high-income countries: The impact of corruption, voice and accountability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanchard, O., Chouraqui, J-C, Hagemann, R., & Sartor, N. (1990). The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old questions. OECD Economic Studies, No. 15, Autumn, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bohn, H. (1998). The behavior of US public debt and deficits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bohn, H. (2008). The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. In R. Neck & J.-E. Sturm (Eds.), Sustainability of public debt (pp. 15–49). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Botev, J., Fournier, J., & Mourougane, A. (2016). A Re-assessment of Fiscal Space in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1352, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fec60e1b-en.
  18. Bray, J. R., & Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographies, 27, 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brun, J.-F., Chambas, G., Combes, J.-L., Dulbecco, P., Gastambide, A., Guerineau, S., & Rota Graziosi, G. (2006). Fiscal space in developing countries. Concept Paper. New York: UNDP, Bureau for Development Policy, Poverty Group.Google Scholar
  20. Brun, J. F., Chambas, G., & Mansour, M. (2015). Tax effort of developing countries: An alternative measure. In M. Boussichas & P. Guillaumont (Eds.), Financing sustainable development addressing vulnerabilities. Paris: FERDI, Economica.Google Scholar
  21. Cagé, J., & Gadenne, L. (2018). Tax revenues and the fiscal cost of trade liberalization, 1792–2006, 1792–2006. Explorations in Economic History, 70, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng, H.W.J., & Pitterle, I. (2018). Towards a more comprehensive assessment of fiscal space. DESA Working Paper No. 153, ST/ESA/2018/DWP/153. United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Christiansen, L., Schindler, M., & Tressel, T. (2013). Growth and structural reforms: A new assessment. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clements, B., Dybczak, K., Gaspar, V., Gupta, S., & Soto, M. (2015). The Fiscal Consequences of Shrinking Populations. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/15/21. International Monetary Fund, Wsshington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Crivelli, E. (2016). Trade liberalization and tax revenue in transition: an empirical analysis of the replacement strategy. Eurasian Economic Review, 6, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crivelli, E. and Gupta, S. (2014). Resource blessing, revenue curse? Domestic revenue effort in resource-rich countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 35, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cyan, M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Vulovic, V. (2013). Measuring tax effort: Does the estimation approach matter and should effort be linked to expenditure goals?. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper 13-08Google Scholar
  28. De Benedictis, L., & Tajoli, L. (2007). Economic integration and similarity in trade structures. Empirica, 34, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Benedictis, L., & Tajoli, L. (2008). Similarity in trade structures, integration and catching-up. Economics of Transition., 16(2), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Development Committee. (2006). Fiscal Policy for Growth and Development—An Interim Report. Paper presented at the Development Committee Meeting, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  31. Easterly, William. (2002). How Did heavily indebted poor countries become heavily indebted? Reviewing two decades of debt relief. World Development, 30(10), 1677–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisl, A. (2017). Explaining Variation in Public Debt: A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of Governance. MaxPo Discussion Paper 17/1. Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies Sciences Po, France.Google Scholar
  33. Escolano, J. (2010). A Practical guide to public debt dynamics, fiscal sustainability, and cyclical adjustment of budgetary aggregates. Technical notes and manuals No. 2010/2. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  34. Finger, J. M., & Kreinin, M. E. (1979). A measure of “export similarity” and its possible uses. Economic Journal, 89(356), 905–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fournier, J.M., & Fall, F. (2015). Limits to Government Debt Sustainability”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1229, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrxv0fctk7j-en.
  36. Frenkel, J. A., & Razin, A. (1999). International effects of tax reforms. The Economic Journal, 99(395), 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghosh, A. R., Kim, J. I., Mendoza, E. G., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. Economic Journal, 123(566), 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gnangnon, S. K. (2018). Export product concentration and De Facto Fiscal Space: Does openness to international trade matter? Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, 18(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  39. Gnangnon, S. K. (2019a). Fiscal space for trade: How could the international trade community help? Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 10(01), 1950001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gnangnon, S. K. (2019b). De Facto Fiscal Space in Donor-countries and their aid supply: To what extent is trade-related aid supply affected? South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 8(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. F. (2017). Impact of export upgrading on tax revenue in developing and high-income countries. Oxford Development Studies, 45(4), 542–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. F. (2018a). Is the impact of development aid on government revenue sustainable? An empirical assessment. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 67, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. F. (2018b). Impact of bridging the Internet gap on public revenue mobilization. Information Economics and Policy., 4(C), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grilli, Vittorio, Masciandaro, Donato, Tabellini, Guido, Malinvaud, Edmond, & Pagano, Marco. (1991). Political and monetary institutions and public financial policies in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 6(13), 341–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haley, A. J. (2018). Fiscal Space: What Is It? Who Has It? When to Use It? Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) Paper No. 181, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Harris, E. (2013). Financing social protection floors: Considerations of fiscal space. International Social Security Review, 66(3–4), 111–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heller, P. (2005). Understanding Fiscal Space. IMF Policy Discussion Paper No. PDP/05/4. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  48. Aizenman J. & Jinjarak, Y. (2011). The Fiscal Stimulus of 2009-10: Trade Openness, Fiscal Space and Exchange Rate Adjustment, NBER Working Paper 17427.Google Scholar
  49. Keen, M., & Simone, A. (2004). Tax policy in developing countries: some lessons from the 1990s and some challenges ahead (pp. 302–352). Helping countries develop: The role of fiscal policy.Google Scholar
  50. Khattry, B., & Rao, J. M. (2002). Fiscal faux pas?: an analysis of the revenue implications of trade liberalization. World Development, 30(8), 1431–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Langford, B., & Ohlenburg, T. (2016). Tax revenue potential and effort: an empirical investigation, Working Paper S-43202-UGA-1. International Growth Centre, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  52. Le, T.M., Moreno-Dodson, B., & Bayraktar, N. (2012). Tax capacity and tax effort extended cross-country analysis from 1994 to 2009. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6252, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  53. Mario, M. (2013). Budgeting for fiscal space and government performance beyond the great recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(2), 9–47.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2009). Polity IV project country reports, CIDUM. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  55. Michaelis, J., & Birk, A. (2006). Employment- and growth effects of tax reforms. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 909–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morrissey, O., Von Haldenwang, C., Von Schiller, A., Ivanyna, M., & Bordon, I. (2016). Tax revenue performance and vulnerability in developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 52, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Naito, T. (2017). An asymmetric Melitz model of trade and growth. Economics Letters, 158, 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nashashibi, K., & Bazoni, S. (1994). Exchange rate policies and fiscal performance in sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Staff Papers, 41(1), 76–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nerlich, C., & Reuter, W. (2013). The design of national fiscal frameworks and their budgetary impact. ECB Working Paper Series 1588, 1–30Google Scholar
  60. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oatley, T. (2010). Political Institutions and Foreign Debt in the Developing World”. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ostry, J., Ghosh, A.R., Kim, J.I., and Qureshi, M. (2010). Fiscal space. IMF Staff Position Note SPN/10/11. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  64. Park, S. (2012). Quantifying impact of aging population on fiscal space. IMF Working Paper No. 12/164, Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF, Washington.Google Scholar
  65. Roodman, D. M. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roy, R., Heuty, A., & Letouzé, E. (2006). Fiscal space for public investment: Towards a human development approach. Paper prepared for the G24-Meeting in Singapore, September 2006. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  67. Roy, R., Heuty A., & Letouzé, E. (2007). Fiscal space for what? Analytical issues from a human development perspective. Paper prepared for the G20-Workshop on Fiscal Policy, June–July 2007, UNDP, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Saxegaard, M. (2014). Safe debt and uncertainty in emerging markets: An application to South Africa. IMF Working Paper No. 14/231 (Washington: International Monetary Fund)Google Scholar
  69. Schick, A. (2009). Budgeting for Fiscal Space. OECD Journal on Budgeting. Vol. 9, No. 2. http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgetingandpublicexpenditures/45361746.pdf.
  70. Tanzi V (1977) Inflation, lags in collection, and the real value of tax revenue. Staff Papers, 26, 154-67, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  71. Tanzi, V., & Zee, H. H. (2000). Tax policy for emerging markets: Developing countries. National Tax Journal, 299–322.Google Scholar
  72. Ter-Minassian, T., Hughes, R., & Hajdenberg, A. (2008). Creating Sustainable Fiscal Space for Infrastructure: The Case of Tanzania. IMF Working Paper, WP/08/256, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  73. Thomas, A., & J.P. Treviño (2013) Resource Dependence and Fiscal Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Paper, WP/13/188, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  74. Torgler, B. (2003). Tax morale and institutions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Torgler, B., Schneider, F., & Macintyre, A. (2011). Shadow economy, voice and accountability and corruption. Handbook on the shadow economic, 469.Google Scholar
  76. Yeyati, E. L., Panizza, U., & Stein, E. (2007). The cyclical nature of North-South FDI flows. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26, 104–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yohou, D.H. (2015). In Search of Fiscal Space in Africa: The Role of the Quality of Government Spending. CERDI, Série Études Et Documents, no 27, Clermont-Ferrand, France.Google Scholar
  78. Yohou, H. D., and Goujon, M. (2017). Reassessing tax effort in developing countries: A proposal of a vulnerability-adjusted tax effort index (VATEI). Working Paper no 186, Fondation pour les Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International (FERDI).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Trade OrganizationGeneva 21Switzerland
  2. 2.CNRS, CERDIUniversité Clermont AuvergneClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations