Advertisement

Collusive corruption in public services: evidence from Chinese state corruption audits

  • Anthony Liu
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the collusive bureaucrat-business relationship in the transitional emerging economy of China. Based on a sample of 334 reported corruption audits manually collected from the online official public resources of the Chinese National Audit Office (CNAO), logistic regression tests are run to test the main effects under investigation and the moderating role of two institutional factors. The test results reveal that the likelihood of bureaucrat-business collusive corruption is positively correlated to the level of the corruption perpetrator’s political ranking; that corruptions in group are more likely to be collusive than those by individuals, and that public services involving governmental approval and authorization over businesses are more likely to corrupt collusively than those involving the mere provision of governmental governance. This study also proves the significant moderating role of GDP as an economic-political institutional measure, and REGION, as a socio-political institutional measure, on the correlation between collusive corruption and the political ranking of corruption perpetrators. Specifically, a weak institutional framework may encourage higher-ranking officials to commit bureaucrat-business collusive corruption crime. This study makes three unique contributions to existing anti-corruption and auditing studies. First, it sheds light on the collusive nature of bureaucratic corruption. Second, it brings institutional factors into the investigation of the bureaucrat-business collusive corruption. Finally, it links anti-corruption efforts and state audits, which lead to a better understanding of the role played by state audits in China’s newly-launched anti-corruption campaign.

Keywords

Collusive corruption Rent seeking Institutional weakness State audits 

Notes

References

  1. Aidt, T. S. (2009). Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. M., Rowley, C. K., & Tollison, R. D. (1988). Rent-seeking and the restriction of human exchange. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awasthi, R., & Bayraktar, N. (2015). Can tax simplification help lower tax corruption? Eurasian Economic Review, 5(2), 297–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. (1997). A theory of mis-governance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1289–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A., & Sengupta, P. K. (2008). Conceptualizing political corruption: issues and problems. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 69(3), 473–482.Google Scholar
  6. Brumm, H. J. (1999). Rent seeking and economic growth: evidence from the States. Cato Journal, 19(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, C., & Wu, H. (2005). Determinants of regional growth disparity in China’s transitional economy. Journal of Economic Studies, 32(5), 406–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, I. M., & Chawdhry, M. A. (2002). Rent seeking and economic growth: evidence from a panel of US states. CATO Journal, 22(2), 211–228.Google Scholar
  9. CNAO (The Chinese National Audit Office). (2011–2017). CNAO reports on anti-corruption government audit findings. Beijing: CNAO. http://www.audit.gov.cn/n5/n25/index.html. Accessed 31 May 2018.
  10. Dong, B., & Torgle, B. (2013). Causes of corruption: evidence from China. China Economic Review, 26, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzhumashev, R. (2014). The two-way relationship between government spending and corruption and its effects on economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dzhumashev, R. (2016). The role of income uncertainty in the corruption-growth nexus. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16(2), 1169–1201.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, P. V. (2006). Rent-seeking, institutions and reforms in Africa: theory and empirical evidence for Tanzania. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Gong, T. (1997). Forms and characteristics of China’s corruption in the 1990s: change with continuity. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 30(3), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo, Y., & Song, W. (2015). Measuring corruption (Fubai Celiang). Beijing: Qinghua University Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. He, J. (2016). Reorganization of anti-corruption agencies in China. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 19(2), 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, C.-J. (2016). Is corruption bad for economic growth? Evidence from Asia–Pacific countries. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iqbal, N., & Daly, V. (2014). Rent seeking opportunities and economic growth in transitional economies. Economic Modelling, 37, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kayrak, M. (2008). Evolving challenges for supreme audit institutions in struggling with corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 15(1), 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kostakis, I. (2017). The impact of shadow economy and/or corruption on private consumption: further evidence from selected Eurozone economies. Eurasian Economic Review, 7(3), 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leff, N. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioural Scientists, 8, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levi, M., & Ruan, F. (1996). Corruption legislation and socio-economic change in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Financial Crime, 4(2), 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine, H. (1981). Corruption and state auditing: The politics of indignation. In B. Geist (Ed.), Developments in public accountability (pp. 6–163). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Liu, G., & Gong, K. (2018). State auditing and anticorruption campaign: evidence from China. Sustainability and social responsibility. In G. Gal, O. Akisik, & W. Wooldridge (Eds.), Regulation and reporting, accounting, finance, sustainability, governance & fraud: theory and application (pp. 117–139). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, G., & Liu, S. (2017). Corruption crime and punishment: evidence from China’s state corruption audits. Journal of Financial Crime, 24(4), 601–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neu, D., Everett, J., Rahaman, A. S., & Martinez, D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption. Accounting, Organization and Society, 38, 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pei, M. (2007). Corruption threatens China’s future. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Policy Brief, 55: 1–8. October 9, 2007. https://zh.scribd.com/document/13218126/Corruption-Threatens-China-s-Future. Accessed 24 January 2017.
  29. Shleifer, A. (1997). Government in transition. European Economic Review, 41, 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sukhtankar, S. and Vaishnav, M. (2015), Corruption in India: Bridging research evidence and policy options. Working paper, April 27, 2015. https://www.dartmouth.edu/~sandip/Sukhtankar-Vaishnav-Corruption-IPF_Full.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2018.
  31. Tollison, R. D. (1982). Rent seeking: a survey. Kyklos, 35(4), 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu, Y. (2002). Regional disparities in China: an alternative view. International Journal of Social Economics, 29(7), 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DBMBNU-HKBU United International CollegeZhuhaiChina

Personalised recommendations