Advertisement

Structural demand estimation of the response to food safety regulations in the Japanese poultry market

  • Qizhong YangEmail author
  • Keiichiro Honda
  • Tsunehiro Otsuki
Regular Article

Abstract

Since their implementation in 1995, the agreements on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade of the world trade organization have played an increasingly important role in the conduct of international negotiations. This study employs the method of moments estimator proposed by Berry et al. (RAND J Econ 25:242–262, 1995) and Nevo (Econometrica 69(2):513–548, 2001) to estimate the effect of Japanese pesticide residue standards on poultry consumption with a particular focus on the maximum residue limits (MRLs) on pesticide and veterinary drugs. The results confirm that more stringent MRLs on pesticide and veterinary drugs enhance the demand for poultry imports by ensuring higher food safety. The results shed light on Japanese consumers’ robust preference for food safety. The own- and cross-price elasticities further indicate the sensitivity of imported poultry meat to the change in domestic poultry price.

Keywords

Poultry consumption Food safety regulations Random coefficient demand 

Notes

References

  1. Berry, S. (1994). Estimating discrete choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica, 60(4), 889–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonnet, C., & Réquillart, V. (2013). Tax incidence with strategic firms in the soft drink market. Journal of Public Economics, 106, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carranza, J. E. (2010). Product innovation and adoption in market equilibrium: The case of digital cameras. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, 604–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Disdier, A. C., & Marette, S. (2010). The combination of gravity and welfare approaches for evaluating nontariff measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92, 713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan, Y., & Yang, C. Y. (2016). Competition, product proliferation and welfare: A study of the US smartphone market. CEPR Discussion Papers 11423.Google Scholar
  7. Gowrisankaran, G., & Rysman, M. (2012). Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. Journal of Political Economy, 120(6), 1173–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Honda, K., & Otsuki, T. (2016). The effect of pesticide residue standards on Japanese orange imports: An AIDS model analysis. Mimeo, Osaka University, Osaka.Google Scholar
  9. Honda, K., Kimura, F., & Otsuki, T. (2011). Demand response for imported and domestic poultry meat products to food safety regulations in Japan: An application of the almost ideal demand system model. OSIPP Discussion Paper, DP-2011-E-007.Google Scholar
  10. Josling, T., Roberts, D., & Orden, D. (2004). Food regulation and trade. Toward a safe and open global system. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Kiesel, K., & Villas-Boas, S. B. (2007). Got organic milk? Consumer valuations of milk labels after the implementation of the USDA organic seal. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 5(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, Y., & Beghin, J. (2014). Protectionism indices for non-tariff measures: An application to maximum residue levels. Food Policy, 45, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, J., & Moul, C. C. (2015). Who should handle retail? Vertical contracts, customer service, and social welfare in a Chinese mobile phone market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 39, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, Y. Z., Rigoberto, A. L., & Zhu, C. (2014). The impact of four alternative policies to decrease soda consumption. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 43(1), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, & J. W. Weibull (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  16. McFadden, D. (1984). Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. Handbook of Econometrics, 2, 1395–1457. (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nevo, A. (2000). A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random coefficients logit models of demand. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nevo, A. (2001). Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica, 69(2), 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nurski, L., & Verboven, F. (2016). Exclusive dealing as a barrier to entry? Evidence from automobiles. Review of Economic Studies, 83, 1156–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thilmany, D., & Barrett, C. (1997). Regulatory barriers in an integrating world food market. Review of Agricultural Economics, 19, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiong, B., & Beghin, J. (2014). Disentangling demand-enhancing and trade-cost effects of maximum residue regulations. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1190–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang, S. R., & Koo, W. W. (1994). Japanese meat import demand estimation with the source differentiated AIDS model. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19, 396–408.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osaka School of International Public PolicyOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Administrative StudiesPrefectural University of KumamotoKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations