Advertisement

The determinants of corporate profitability in the Italian domestic appliances industry

  • Fabio Pieri
  • Riccardo Verruso
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Among the industries that characterize the Italian sectoral specialization, domestic appliances have had, since the 1950s, a prominent role. However, from the beginning of the 2000s, the Italian producers have experienced a contraction in the total output and severe losses in terms of export shares in the global market. Within the industry, some firms have been successful, positively contributing to the aggregate performance, while others have performed poorly and reduced the overall sectoral growth and competitiveness. By employing a sample of about 140 companies observed in the period 2007–2016 and using a dynamic panel approach, we inquire into the determinants of profitability in the domestic appliances industry in Italy. Competitiveness (in terms of both higher labor productivity and lower labor cost per employee) is a key determinant of profitability in this industry. Moreover, firm (absolute) size, the firm’s financial structure and the firm’s market share also play a role in explaining differences in profit rates across firms. Managers and policy makers should take the maturity of the domestic appliances industry into account in order to take proper decisions and design effective interventions, all aimed at sustaining the sectoral competitiveness in the global market.

Keywords

Profitability Firm characteristics Domestic appliances industry Dynamic panel data models 

JEL Classification

L11 L25 L68 C23 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable comments by two reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief (Antonello Zanfei). Fabio Pieri acknowledges financial support from the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research (FFABR 2017).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1011–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baden-Fuller, C. W. F., & Stopford, J. M. (1991). Globalization frustrated: The case of white goods. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bain, J. (1951). Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balloni, V. (1978). Origini, sviluppo e maturità dell’industria dell’elettrodomestico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  7. Balloni, V., & Cucculelli, M. (2000). Note sui processi di apprendimento ed economie di scale nell’industria italiana dell’elettrodomestico. L’Industria, XXI(3), 519–541.Google Scholar
  8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benito, A., & Gertjan, V. (2000). Stylised facts on UK corporate financial health, evidence from micro data. Bank of England Financial Stability Review, 1, 83–93.Google Scholar
  10. Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking—Test of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performance and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1953–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2006). Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brozen, Y. (1970). Bain’s concentration and rates of return revisited. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bugamelli, M., Cannari, L., Lotti, F., & Magri, S. (2012). Il gap innovativo del sistema produttivio italiano: Radici e possibili rimedi. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), No. 121, Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
  17. Bugamelli, M., Lotti, F., Amici, M., Ciapanna, E., Colonna, F., D’Amuri, F., et al. (2018). Productivity growth in Italy: A tale of a slow-motion change. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), No. 422, Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
  18. Bugamelli, M., Schivardi, F., & Zezza, R. (2010). The Euro and firm restructuring. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Europe and the Euro (pp. 99–138). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Calligaris, S., Del Gatto, M., Hassan, F., Ottaviano, G. I. P., Schivardi, F. (2016). Italy’s productivity conondrum. A study on resource misallocation in Italy. European Economy Discussion Paper 030, European Commission, DG ECFIN.Google Scholar
  20. CECED Italia (2012). Apparecchi domestici e professionali. Garantire il futuro in Italia. Osservatorio Strategico Confindustria-CECED Italia, Associazione nazionale produttori di apparecchi domestici e professionali.Google Scholar
  21. CECED Italia (2015). L’industria italiana degli apparecchi domestici nel 2015. Associazione nazionale produttori di apparecchi domestici e professionali.Google Scholar
  22. Cefis, E. (2003). Persistence in innovation and profitability. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 111(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  23. Coad, A. (2007). Testing the principle of the ‘growth of the fitter’: The relationship between profits and firm growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18, 370–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coad, A., & Grassano, N. (2016), Who’s doing who? Growth of sales, employment, assets, profits and R&D entangled in a curious five-way love triangle. JCR-IPTS Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation, No. 3/2016, Institute of Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.Google Scholar
  25. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins, N. R., & Preston, L. E. (1969). Price-cost margins and industry structure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Comanor, W. S., & Wilson, T. (1967). Advertising market structure and performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Daveri, F., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (2005). Italy’s decline: Getting the facts right. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Econonomia, 64(4), 365–410.Google Scholar
  29. Davies, R. B., Martin, J., Parenti, M., & Toubal, F. (2018). Knocking on the tax haven’s door: Multinational firms and transfer pricing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Benedictis, L. (2005). Three decades of Italian comparative advantages. The World Economy, 28(11), 1697–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. De Nardis, S. (2014). Efficienza e specializzazione. Bologna: Ufficio Studi - Nomisma.Google Scholar
  32. Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Di Maio, M. (2014). The Italian economy, the economic crisis and industrial policy. In A. Teixeira, E. Silva, & R. Mamede (Eds.), Structural change, competitiveness and industrial policy, Chapter 12. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Dosi, G. (2007). Statistical regularities in the evolution of industries. A guide through some evidence and challenges for the theory. In F. Malerba & S. Brusoni (Eds.), Perspective on innovation, Chap. 5 (pp. 153–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eklund, J. E., & Lappi, E. (2018). Persistence of profits in the EU: How competitive are EU member countries? Empirica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9399-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Esteve-Pérez, S., Pieri, F., & Rodriguez, D. (2018). Age and productivity as determinants of firm survival of the industry life cycle. Industry and Innovation, 25(2), 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Europe Economics (2015). The economic impact of the domestic appliances industry in Europe, April 2015, London.Google Scholar
  38. European Commission (2014). Access to External Finance and Firms’ Growth. In Helping firms grow, Chap. 2, Commission Staff Working Document, 277. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  39. Eurostat (2015). Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (NACE, Rev. 2). Retrieved September 8, 2018, from RAMON—Reference and Management of Nomenclatures.Google Scholar
  40. Faini, R., & Sapir, A. (2005). Un modello obsoleto? Crescita e specializzazione dell’economia italiana. In T. Boeri, R. Faini, A. Ichino, G. Pisauro, & C. Scarpa (Eds.), Oltre il Declino. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  41. Fortis, M. (ed.) (2005). Le due sfide del made in Italy: Globalizzazione e innovazione. In Profili di analisi della Seconda Conferenza Nazionale sul Commercio con l’Estero. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  42. Fortis, M. (2016). Production districts and their relevance in the Italian economy: A few analytical profiles. In M. Fortis (Ed.), The pillars of the Italian economy. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gattai, V., & Sali, G. (2016). FDI and heterogeneous performance of European enterprises. Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 43(1), 25–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Geroski, P. A., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). The persistence of profit: A European comparison. Economic Journal, 98(391), 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, O. S. (2004). The profitability of European banks: Cross-sectional and dynamic panel analysis. The Manchester School, 72(3), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goddard, J., Tavakoli, M., & Wilson, O. S. (2005). Determinants of profitability in European manufacturing and services: Evidence from a dynamic panel model. Applied Financial Economics, 15, 1269–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goddard, J., & Wilson, J. O. S. (1999). The persistence of profit: A new empirical interpretation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 663–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grabowski, H., Vernon, J., & DiMasi, J. A. (2002). Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions. Pharmacoeconomics, 20(3), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grazzi, M., Piccardo, C., & Vergari, C. (2017). Building a firm level dataset for the analysis of industrial dynamics and demography. Quaderni—Working Paper DSE N°2003, University of Bologna.Google Scholar
  50. Grinyer, P. H., & McKiernan, P. (1991). The determinants of corporate profitability in the UK electrical engineering industry. British Journal of Management, 2, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hassan, F., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2013). Productivity in Italy: The great unlearning. VoxEU, 14 December 2013.Google Scholar
  52. Hayakawa, K. (2009). First difference or forward orthogonal deviation—Which transformation should be used in dynamic panel data models? Economics Bulletin, 29(3), 2008–2017.Google Scholar
  53. Huizinga, H., & Laeven, L. (2008). International profit shifting within multinationals: A multi-country perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1164–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86, 562–583.Google Scholar
  56. Krugman, P. (2012). What’s the matter with Italy? The New York Times, 26 November 2012.Google Scholar
  57. Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertainty imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lucchese, M., Nascia, L., & Pianta, M. (2016). Industrial policy and technology in Italy. Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 43, 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, S. (2002). Advanced industrial economics. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. McDonald, J. T. (1999). The determinants of firm profitability in Australian manufacturing. The Economic Record, 75(229), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mueller, D. C. (1977). The persistence of profits above the norm. Economica, 44, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and the consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nickell, S. J. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nunes, P. M., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2015). Profitability determinants of Portuguese knowledge-intensive business services: Empirical evidence using panel data models. Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. OECD. (2018). Taxing wages—Italy. Paris: Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.Google Scholar
  66. Onida, F. (1998). L’industria italiana in un contesto aperto. L’Industria, XIX(2), 279–286.Google Scholar
  67. Paba, S. (1991). Brand reputation, efficiency and the concentration process: A case study. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pattitoni, P., Petracci, B., & Spisni, M. (2014). Determinants of profitability in the EU-15 area. Applied Financial Economics, 24(11), 763–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Petev, Ivaylo D., Pistaferri, L., & Saporta-Eksten, I. (2011). An analysis of trends, perceptions, and distributional effects in consumption. In D. B. Grusky, Bruce Western, & C. Wimer (Eds.), The great recession (pp. 161–195). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  71. Pieri, F. (2018). Vertical organization of production and firm growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pinelli, D., Székely, I., & Varga, J. (2015). Italy’s productivity challenge. VoxEU, 22 December 2015.Google Scholar
  73. Pisati, M. (2004). Simple thematic mapping. The Stata Journal, 4, 361–378.Google Scholar
  74. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation (pp. 79–91). Boston: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  75. Roodman, D. (2009a). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.Google Scholar
  76. Roodman, D. (2009b). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rubin, P. H. (1973). The expansion of firms. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 936–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sarno, D. (2000). Profittabilità e crescita nelle imprese del Mezzogiorno. L’Industria, XXI(2), 237–261.Google Scholar
  80. Schumacher, S. K., & Boland, M. A. (2005). The persistence of profitability among firms in the food economy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shepherd, W. G. (1972). The elements of market structure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sica, F. G. M. (2014). Il settore degli apparecchi domestici e professionali: Tra glorie passate e sfide future. Rivista di Politica Economica, no. I–III, pp. 36–94.Google Scholar
  83. Slade, M. E. (2004). Competing models of firm profitability. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Syverson, C. (2010). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49, 326–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Toniolo, G. (ed.) (2013). La crescita economica italiana, 1861–2011. In L’Italia e l’economia mondiale. Dall’Unità a oggi. Venice: Marsilio, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
  87. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Windmejer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations