Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 227–243 | Cite as

Seasonal prediction of particulate matter over the steel city of India using neural network models

  • Priyanjali Gogikar
  • Bhishma TyagiEmail author
  • A. K. Gorai
Original Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

The particulate matter (PM) concentration forecast is an important component to evaluate the air quality over any region of the world. The results are vital when it comes to health concern issues related to air pollution in developing countries like India and China. The present study is focused on the prediction of future concentrations of respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM, also called PM2.5) and suspended particulate matter (SPM, also called PM10) using the artificial neural networks (ANN) over tropical inland industrial site, Rourkela. Rourkela, popularly known as steel city of India is situated at the heart of a rich mineral belt and is endowed with many small, medium and large scale industries. This study aims to develop a seasonal ANN modelling approach for prediction of RSPM and SPM for the year 2013 by using the datasets of meteorology and RSPM and SPM concentrations covered from 2009 to 2013. Four neural network models namely, wavelet-based multi-layer perceptron feed forward neural network (WMLPNN), wavelet-based recurrent neural network, multi-layer perceptron feed forward neural network (MLPNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) are used. The networks are trained using daily data from 2009 to 2012 on a seasonal basis, and daily predictions are performed for 2013 using seasonal based trained model. Five meteorological variables [temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), boundary layer height (BLH), surface pressure (SP), wind direction (WD) and wind speed (WS)] along with the Daubechies wavelet decomposed coefficients are considered as predictor variables in the models. A lagged scheme is introduced in wind speed input vector and networks are trained and tested up to 3 days lagged wind speed variable which greatly improved the prediction accuracy. WMLPNN is found to be outperforming all other tested schemes by providing promising results among all the tested models with lag in pre-monsoon, monsoon and winter seasons and without lag in wind speed for the post-monsoon season for both RSPM and SPM, elucidating the importance of predictor wind speed in the models. The values of R2 varied from 0.6 to 0.91 for RSPM and 0.7 to 0.98 for SPM and RMSE values varied from 0.09 to 0.14 for RSPM and 0.03 to 0.13 for SPM for WMLPNN model. The proposed WMLPNN model in the present study appeared to be reliable and promising for the prediction of PM2.5 and PM10 by providing aid in passing the alerts and notices for the betterment of living beings.

Keywords

Air quality prediction Artificial neural networks Wavelet analysis Particulate matter RSPM and SPM concentrations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ms. Priyanjali Gogikar would like to acknowledge National Institute of Technology Rourkela for providing fellowship to conduct research.

References

  1. Akaike H (2011) Akaike’s information criterion. In: Lovric M (ed) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristodemou E, Boganegra LM, Mottet L, Pavlidis D, Constantinou A, Pain C, Robins A, ApSimon H (2018) How tall buildings affect turbulent air flows and dispersion of pollution within a neighbourhood. Environ Pollut 233:782–796Google Scholar
  3. Azid A, Juahir H, Toriman ME, Kamarudin MKA, Saudi ASM, Hasnam CNC, Aziz NAA, Azaman F, Latif MT, Zainuddin SFM, Osman MR, Yamin M (2014) Prediction of the level of air pollution using principal component analysis and artificial neural network techniques: a case study in Malaysia. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2063Google Scholar
  4. Balasubramanian M, Palanivel S, Ramalingam V (2009) Real time face and mouth recognition using radial basis function neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 36:6879–6888Google Scholar
  5. Barai SV, Dikshit AK, Sharma S (2007) Neural network models for air quality prediction: a comparative study, in: soft computing in industrial applications. Advances in Soft Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 290–305Google Scholar
  6. Benvenuto F, Marani A (2001) Neural networks for environmental problems: data quality control and air pollution nowcasting. Glob Nest Int J 2(3):281–292Google Scholar
  7. Census Report (2011) The Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Government of India. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  8. Chelani AB (2005) Predicting chaotic time series of PM10 concentration using artificial neural network. Int J Environ Res 62(2):181–191Google Scholar
  9. Chelani AB, Rao CC, Phadke KM, Hasan MZ (2002a) Prediction of sulphur dioxide concentration using artificial neural networks. Environ Model Softw 2:159–166Google Scholar
  10. Chelani AB, Gajghate DG, Hasan MZ (2002b) Prediction of ambient PM10 and toxic metals using artificial neural networks. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52(7):805–810Google Scholar
  11. Chellali MR, Abderrahim H, Hamou A, Nebatti A, Janovec J (2016) Artificial neural network models for prediction of daily fine particulate matter concentrations in Algiers. Environ Sci Poll Res 23(14):14008–14017Google Scholar
  12. CPCB Report (2009) National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), Gazette Notifcation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. Daubechies I (1988) Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia. ISBN:978-0-898712-74-2Google Scholar
  14. de Gennaro G, Trizio L, Di Gilio A, Pey J, Pérez N, Cusack M, Alastuey A, Querol X (2013) Neural network model for the prediction of PM10 daily concentrations in two sites in the Western Mediterranean. Sci Total Environ 463(464):875–883Google Scholar
  15. Dee DP, Uppala S, Simmons A, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Alonso-Balmaseda M, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars A, Van de Berg L, Bidlot JR, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy S, Hersbach H, Holm EV, Isaken L, Kallberg PW, Kohler M, Matricardi M, McNally A, Mongesanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thepaut JN, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597Google Scholar
  16. Dunea D, Iordache S (2015) Time series analysis of air pollutants recorded from Romanian EMEP stations at mountain sites. Environ Eng Manag J 14:2725–2735Google Scholar
  17. Elangasinghe MA, Singhal N, Dirks KN, Salmond JA (2014a) Development of an ANN-based air pollution forecasting system with explicit knowledge through sensitivity analysis. Atmos Pollut Res 5:696–708Google Scholar
  18. Elangasinghe MA, Singhal N, Dirks KN, Salmond JA, Samarasinghe S (2014b) Complex time series analysis of PM10 and PM2. 5 for a coastal site using artificial neural network modelling and k-means clustering. Atmos Environ 94:106–116Google Scholar
  19. Elbayoumi M, Ramli NA, Yusof NFFM (2015) Development and comparison of regression models and feedforward backpropagation neural network models to predict seasonal indoor PM2. 5–10 and PM2. 5 concentrations in naturally ventilated schools. Atmos Poll Res 6(6):1013–1102Google Scholar
  20. Elman JL (1990) Finding structure in time. Cogn Sci 14:179–211Google Scholar
  21. Feng X, Li Q, Zhu Y, Hou J, Jin L, Wang J (2015) Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmos Environ 107:118–128Google Scholar
  22. Gardner MW, Dorling SR (1998) Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32:2627–2636Google Scholar
  23. Gogikar P, Tyagi B (2016) Assessment of particulate matter variation during 2011–2015 over a tropical station Agra, India. Atmos Environ 147:11–21Google Scholar
  24. Gogikar P, Tyagi B, Padhan RR, Mahaling M (2018) Particulate matter assessment using in-situ observations from 2009 to 2014 over an industrial region of Eastern India. Earth Syst Environ 2(2):305–322Google Scholar
  25. Guajardo JA, Weber R, Miranda J (2010) A model updating strategy for predicting time series with seasonal patterns. Appl Soft Comput 10:276–283Google Scholar
  26. Guttikunda SK, Gurjar BR (2012) Role of meteorology in seasonality of air pollution in megacity Delhi, India. Environ Monit Assess 184:3199–3211Google Scholar
  27. Haykin SS (2009) Neural networks and learning machines. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  28. Hooyberghs J, Mensink C, Dumont G, Fierens F, Brasseur O (2005) A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium. Atmos Environ 39:3279–3289Google Scholar
  29. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366Google Scholar
  30. Jiang N, Hay JE, Fisher GW (2005) Effects of meteorological conditions on concentrations of nitrogen oxides in Auckland. Weather Clim 24:15–34Google Scholar
  31. Kavuri NC, Paul KK (2013) Chemical characterization of ambient PM10 Aerosol in a steel city, Rourkela, India. Res J Recent Sci 2277:2502Google Scholar
  32. Kavuri N, Paul KK, Roy N (2013) Regression modelling of gaseous air pollutants and meteorological parameters in a steel city, Rourkela, India. Res J Recent Sci 2:285Google Scholar
  33. Kukkonen J, Partanen L, Karppinen A, Ruuskanen J, Junninen H, Kolehmainen M, Niska H, Dorling S, Chatterton T, Foxall R, Cawley G (2003) Extensive evaluation of neural network models for the prediction of NO2 and PM10 concentrations, compared with a deterministic modelling system and measurements in central Helsinki. Atmos Environ 374539–374550Google Scholar
  34. Kumar A, Goyal P (2013) Forecasting of air quality index in Delhi using neural network based on principal component analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 170(4):711–722Google Scholar
  35. Kumar P, Ketzel M, Vardoulakis S, Pirjola L, Britter R (2011) Dynamics and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles from road traffic in the urban atmospheric environment—a review. J Aero Sci 42:580–603Google Scholar
  36. Kumar N, Middey A, Rao PS (2017) Prediction and examination of seasonal variation of ozone with meteorological parameter through artificial neural network at Neeri, Nagpur, India. Urban Clim 20:148–167Google Scholar
  37. Kumar R, Barth MC, Pfister GG, Monache LD, Lamarque JF, ArcherNicholls S, Tilmes S, Ghude SD, Wiedinmyer C, Naja M, Walters S (2018) How will air quality change in South Asia by 2050? J Geophys Res Atmos 123:1840–1864Google Scholar
  38. Lal B, Tripathy SS (2012) Prediction of dust concentration in open cast coal mine using artificial neural network. Atmos Pollut Res 3(2):211–218Google Scholar
  39. lal Benjamin N, Sharma S, Pendharker U, Shrivastava JK (2014) Air quality prediction using artificial neural network. Int J Chem Stud 2:07–09Google Scholar
  40. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 1:101–124Google Scholar
  41. Mallat S (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the waveletrepresentation. IEEE Trans 11:674–693Google Scholar
  42. Mishra D, Goyal P, Upadhyay A (2015) Artificial intelligence based approach to forecast PM2.5 during haze episodes: a case study of Delhi, India. Atmos Environ 102:239–248Google Scholar
  43. Nunnari G (2004) Modelling air pollution time-series by using wavelet functions and genetic algorithms. Soft Comput 8:173–178Google Scholar
  44. Ozturk ZC, Dursun S (2016) Modelling of atmospheric SO2 pollution in Seydişehir town by artificial neural networks. J Int Environ Appl Sci 11(1):1–7Google Scholar
  45. Parmar KS, Bhardwaj R (2012) Analysis of water parameters using Haar wavelet (level 3). Int J Curr Eng Technol 2(1):166–171Google Scholar
  46. Parmar KS, Bhardwaj R (2013b) Analysis of water parameters using Daubechies wavelet (level 5) (Db5). Am J Math Stat 2(3):57–63Google Scholar
  47. Patra AK, Gautam S, Majumdar S, Kumar P (2016) Prediction of particulate matter concentration profile in an opencast copper mine in India using an artificial neural network model. Air Qual Atmos Health 9(6):697–711Google Scholar
  48. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Modell Softw 6:747–759Google Scholar
  49. Prakash A, Kumar U, Kumar K, Jain VK (2011) A wavelet-based neural network model to predict ambient air pollutants’ concentration. Environ Model Assess 16:503–517Google Scholar
  50. Rai PK, Panda LS, Chutia BM, Singh MM (2013) Roadside plants as bio indicators of air pollution in an industrial region, Rourkela, India. Int J Adv Res Technol 4:14–36Google Scholar
  51. Rama Krishna TVBPS, Reddy MK, Reddy RC, Singh RN (2004) Assimilative capacity and dispersion of pollutants due to industrial sources in Visakhapatnam bowl area. Atmos Environ 38:6775–6787Google Scholar
  52. Rao MN, Rao HVN (1989) Air pollution. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. ISBN:0-07-451871-8Google Scholar
  53. Ray K, Bandopadhyay BK, Sen B, Sharma P, Warsi A, Mohapatra M, Yadav BP, Debnath GC, Stella S, Das S, Duraisamy M, Rajeev VK, Barapatre V, Paul S, Singh H, Saikrishnan KC, Goyal S, Das AK, Bhan SC, Sikka DR, Tyagi A, Das S, Rathore LS (2014) Thunderstorms 2014- A Report SAARC storm project 2014. IMD Report Number: ESSO/IMD/SMRC STORM Project-2014/01(2014)/03, India Meteorological Department, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  54. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536Google Scholar
  55. SAIL Annual report (2016) Steel Authority of India Limited Annual report 2015–2016. 164 available online https://www.sail.co.in/financial-list/103. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  56. Saxena M (2011) Air quality of a steel city, Rourkela, Orissa (BTech)Google Scholar
  57. Shaharuddin M, Zaharim A, Nor MJM, Karim OA, Sopian K (2008) Application of wavelet transform on airborne suspended particulate matter and meteorological temporal variations. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 4:89–98Google Scholar
  58. Sharma P, Sharma P, Jain S, Kumar P (2013) A response to discussion on: “An integrated statistical approach for evaluating the exceedance of criteria pollutants in the ambient air of megacity Delhi”. Atmos Environ 71:413–414Google Scholar
  59. Siwek K, Osowski S (2012) Improving the accuracy of prediction of PM10 pollution by the wavelet transformation and an ensemble of neural predictors. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:1246–1258Google Scholar
  60. Siwek K, Osowski S, Sowinski M (2011) Evolving the ensemble of predictors model for forecasting the daily average PM10. Int. J Environ Pollut 46:199–215Google Scholar
  61. Slini T, Kaprara A, Karatzas K, Moussiopoulos N (2006) PM10 forecasting for Thessaloniki, Greece. Environ Model Softw 21:559–565Google Scholar
  62. Soni K, Parmar KS, Agrawal S (2017) Modelling of air pollution in residential and industrial sites by integrating statistical and Daubechies wavelet (level 5) analysis. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:1187–1198Google Scholar
  63. Sousa SIV, Martins FG, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Pereira MC (2007) Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations. Environ Model Softw 22:97–103Google Scholar
  64. Srimuruganandam B, Nagendra SS (2015) ANN-based PM prediction model for assessing the temporal variability of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations at an urban roadway. Int J Environ Eng 7(1):60–89Google Scholar
  65. Srinivasan D, Liew AC, Chang CS (1994) A neural network short-term load forecaster. Electr Power Syst Res 28:227–234Google Scholar
  66. Tan J, Zhang Y, Ma W, Yu Q, Wang J, Chen L (2015) Impact of spatial resolution on air quality simulation: a case study in a highly industrialized area in Shanghai, China. Atmos Pollut Res 6:322–333Google Scholar
  67. Taspinar F (2015) Improving artificial neural network model predictions of daily average PM10 concentrations by applying principle component analysis and implementing seasonal models. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1995(65):800–809Google Scholar
  68. Tyagi B, Satyanarayana ANV, Rajvanshi RK, Mandal M (2014) Surface energy exchanges during pre-monsoon thunderstorm activity over a tropical station Kharagpur. Pure Appl Geophys 171(7):1445–1459Google Scholar
  69. Tzeng ST (2010) Design of fuzzy wavelet neural networks using the GA approach for function approximation and system identification. Fuzzy Sets Syst Theme Neural Netw 161:2585–2596Google Scholar
  70. Vardoulakis S, Fisher BEA, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca N (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37:155–182Google Scholar
  71. Wang J, Martin ST (2007) Satellite characterization of urban aerosols: importance of including hygroscopicity and mixing state in the retrieval algorithms. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:1–18Google Scholar
  72. WHO|WHO Global Urban Ambient Air Pollution Database (update 2016) [WWW Document]. http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/cities/en/. Accessed 4 June 18
  73. Zainuddin Z, Pauline O (2011) Modified wavelet neural network in function approximation and its application in prediction of time-series pollution data. Appl Soft Comput 11:4866–4874Google Scholar
  74. Zhang H, Zhang S, Wang P, Qin Y, Wang H (2017) Forecasting of particulate matter time series using wavelet analysis and wavelet-ARMA/ARIMA model in Taiyuan, China. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1995(67):776–788Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mining EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations