Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 85–100 | Cite as

A study on the capability of the NCEP-CFS model in simulating the frequency and intensity of high-intensity rainfall events over Indian region in the high and low resolutions

  • Rajib ChattopadhyayEmail author
  • Anjali Thomas
  • R. Phani
  • Susmitha Joseph
  • A. K. Sahai
Original Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

In the current perception of an increase in extreme precipitation events in a developing and densely populated country like India and the demands of high resolution forecast runs are high, the present study compares the statistical skill of free runs from an operational climate model run in two horizontal resolutions in simulating the frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall events over Indian region. The operational climate model is a version of the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP, USA) Climate Forecast System (CFS) version 2. It is run at two horizontal resolutions: CFST126 and CFST382, which is used for seasonal and extended range prediction in real-time in the India Meteorological Department’s (IMD) operational forecast framework. From the analysis of departure and bias of both the components of the model with respect to India Meteorological Department’s (IMD) observation, it is observed that marked dissimilarity in simulating high-intensity rain events exists between this two versions of the same model which should be hypothetically same. Both the models capture intensity and frequency differently. The main conclusions are (a) CFST126 free run gives better estimates of the frequency of rainfall events compared to CFST382, (b) CFST382 free run gives better estimates of the intensity of rainfall events compared to CFST126. These discrepancies indicate the resolution dependence of the statistics of extreme event, which should be statistically corrected and a multi-resolution ensemble version runs of CFSv2 has to be used for operational outlooks of the extreme events.

Keywords

Indian monsoon Extreme event NCEP CFS High resolution Monsoon simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), Pune is fully funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), New Delhi. The authors also thank NCEP for providing reanalysis and other datasets and for transferring the CFS system under the MoU between the Ministry of Earth Science (MoES), Govt. of India and NOAA, US.

References

  1. Abhilash S, Sahai AK, Borah N, Joseph S, Chattopadhyay R, Sharmila S, Rajeevan M, Mapes BE, Kumar A (2015) Improved spread–error relationship and probabilistic prediction from the CFS-based grand ensemble prediction system. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 54:1569–1578.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0200.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chattopadhyay R, Goswami BN, Sahai AK, Fraedrich K (2009) Role of stratiform rainfall in modifying the northward propagation of monsoon intraseasonal oscillation. J Geophys Res Atmos.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011869 Google Scholar
  3. Chattopadhyay R, Rao SA, Sabeerali CT, George G, Rao DN, Dhakate A, Salunke K (2015) Large-scale teleconnection patterns of Indian summer monsoon as revealed by CFSv2 retrospective seasonal forecast runs. Int J Climatol 36:3297–3313.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chattopadhyay R, Krishna RPM, Joseph S, Dey A, Mandal R, Sahai (2017) A comparison of extended-range prediction of monsoon in the IITM-CFSv2 with ECMWF S2S forecast system (no. RR-139). ESSO/IITM/SERP/SR/01(2018)/190. IITM, PuneGoogle Scholar
  5. Goswami BN, Ajayamohan RS, Xavier PK, Sengupta D (2003) Clustering of synoptic activity by Indian summer monsoon intraseasonal oscillations. Geophys Res Lett 30:1431.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016734 Google Scholar
  6. Goswami BN, Venugopal V, Sengupta D, Madhusoodanan MS, Xavier PK (2006) Increasing trend of extreme rain events over India in a warming environment. Science 314:1442–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guhathakurta P, Sreejith OP, Menon PA (2011) Impact of climate change on extreme rainfall events and flood risk in India. J Earth Syst Sci 120:359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0082-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krishnamurthy CKB, Lall U, Kwon H-H (2009) Changing frequency and intensity of rainfall extremes over India from 1951 to 2003. J Clim 22:4737–4746.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2896.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu X, Yang S, Li Q, Kumar A, Weaver S, Liu S (2014) Subseasonal forecast skills and biases of global summer monsoons in the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. Clim Dyn 42:1487–1508.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1831-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Min S-K, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mukherjee S, Aadhar S, Stone D, Mishra V (2018) Increase in extreme precipitation events under anthropogenic warming in India. Weather Clim Extremes 20:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pall, P., Allen, M.R., Stone, D.A., 2007. Testing the Clausius–Clapeyron constraint on changes in extreme precipitation under CO2 warming. Clim Dyn 28:351–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0180-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pattanaik DR, Rajeevan M (2010) Variability of extreme rainfall events over India during southwest monsoon season. Meteorol Appl 17:88–104.  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.164 Google Scholar
  14. Petoukhov V, Petri S, Rahmstorf S, Coumou D, Kornhuber K, Schellnhuber HJ (2016) Role of quasiresonant planetary wave dynamics in recent boreal spring-to-autumn extreme events. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:6862–6867.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606300113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rajeevan M, Bhate J, Kale JD, Lal M (2006) High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the Indian region: analysis of break and active monsoon spells. Curr Sci 91:296–306Google Scholar
  16. Ramu DA, Sabeerali CT, Chattopadhyay R, Rao DN, George G, Dhakate AR, Salunke K, Srivastava A, Rao SA (2016) Indian summer monsoon rainfall simulation and prediction skill in the CFSv2 coupled model: impact of atmospheric horizontal resolution. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:2205–2221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roxy MK, Ghosh S, Pathak A, Athulya R, Mujumdar M, Murtugudde R, Terray P, Rajeevan M (2017) A threefold rise in widespread extreme rain events over central India. Nat Commun 8:708.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00744-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Behringer D, Hou Y-T, Chuang H, Iredell M, Ek M, Meng J, Yang R, Mendez MP, van den Dool H, Zhang Q, Wang W, Chen M, Becker E (2013). The NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. J Clim 27:2185–2208.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sahai AK, Chattopadhyay R, Joseph S, Mandal R, Dey A, Abhilash S, Krishna RPM, Borah N (2015) Real-time performance of a multi-model ensemble-based extended range forecast system in predicting the 2014 monsoon season based on NCEP-CFSv2. Curr Sci 109:1802–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schubert S, Wang H, Suarez M (2011) Warm season subseasonal variability and climate extremes in the northern hemisphere: the role of stationary Rossby waves. J Clim 24:4773–4792.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-10-05035.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Tropical MeteorologyPuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric SciencesCUSATCochinIndia

Personalised recommendations