Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 49–60 | Cite as

Modeling on environmental-economic effectiveness of Vacutug technology of fecal sludge management at Dhaka city in Bangladesh

  • Md. Jakariya
  • Asmaul Housna
  • Md. Nazrul Islam
  • G. U. Ahsan
  • Khalid Mahmud
Original Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Fecal sludge management is an emerging issue in urban sanitation. Access to sewage network is limited in Dhaka; therefore people construct septic tanks and different forms of unhygienic latrines to fulfill their basic sanitary needs. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vacutug pit latrine exhausting technology considering the perspectives of the technical experts, operators and consumers. With increasing rapid growth, Dhaka city may reach up to 25 million people by 2025. The slum population is growing massively and with it sanitation problems. A major problem is one of sanitation facilities, especially for the urban poor but a further and equally pressing one is that of the emptying, transportation and treatment of fecal sludge from latrines. In this paper, the operational, financial and management issues surrounding Vacutug are introduced. The research focused on the experiences from three initiatives (Mirpur, Mohammadpur and Kuril in Dhaka) to gain a greater insight into key features of straight awareness related to participatory planning and community involvement in decision-making, decentralized management arrangements for operation and maintenance, application and operation of decentralized technologies; Financing arrangements and economics of decentralized initiatives.

Keywords

Vacutug Fecal sludge Sustainable management Community involvement Environmental-economic model Bangladesh 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank DSK for their support to collect field level data about the Vacutug technology. The authors are also grateful to Matt for their support in providing technical details of the technology. The authors would like to thank Asif Ibne Yousuf for his valuable comments on the preliminary draft version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Akumuntu JP, Wehn U, Mulenga M, Djanovic D (2017) Enabling the sustainable faecal sludge management service delivery chain—a case study of dense settlements in Kigali, Rwanda. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220(6):960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alabaster G, Issaias I (2003) Removing human waste—the Vacutug solution. Habitat Debate, Case Studies. 9 No. 3.UN-Habitat, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  3. Anda M, Mathew K, Ho G (2001) Evapotranspiration for domestic wastewater reuse in remote indigenous communities of Australia. Water Sci Technol 44(6):1–10Google Scholar
  4. Bassan M, Mbeguere M, Tchonda T, Zabsonre F, Strande L (2013) Integrated faecal sludge management scheme for the cities of Burkina Faso. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 3(2):216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BBS and Unicef (2010) Progotir pathey: multiple indicator cluster survey (MICS), 2009. Statistical Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of Bangladesh and UnicefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biplob P, Sarker CD, Sarker CR (2011) Assessment of water supply and sanitation facilities for korail slum in Dhaka City. Int J Civ Environ Eng 11:115–128Google Scholar
  7. Boot NLD, Scott RE (2008) Faecal sludge management in Accra, Ghana: Strengthening links in the chain. Report of the 33rd WEDC International Conference, Accra, GhanaGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandberg B (2012) Evaluation of the un-habitat Vacutug development project, pit latrine exhausting technology. UN HabitatGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell HW (2000) Sludge management—future issues and trends. Water Sci Technol 41(8):1–8Google Scholar
  10. Carr R (2001) Excreta-related infections and the role of sanitation in the control of transmission, water quality: guidelines, standards and health. World Health Organization (WHO). http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/iwachap5.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2016
  11. Chadwick M, Datta A (2001) Water resource management in Bangladesh-a policy review. Livelihood-Policy Relationships in South Asia. Working Paper 1Google Scholar
  12. Chokewinyoo P (2008) Lessons learned and strategies on Septage Management in Thailand. Paper Presented at the Regional Symposium-cum-Training Workshop on Sustainable Septage Management in Asia and Pacific. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  13. Chowdhry S, Kone D (2012) Business analysis of fecal sludge management: emptying and transportation services in Africa and Asia [Draft Report]. http://saniblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/10-country-FSM-FinalReport_September-2012-1-2-copy.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2016
  14. Cutolo SA, Matte MH, Ro cha AA (2006) Monitoring of parasitological contamination in treated wastewater from activated sludge system. Manag Environ Qual Int J 17(1):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dakar D (2006) Towards an improved Faecal Sludge Management, 1st International Symposium on Faecal Sludge Management Policy, Dakar, Senegal, pp 9–12 May 2006Google Scholar
  16. Diener S, Diener S, Semiyaga S, Niwagaba CB, Muspratt AM, Gning JB, Mbéguéré M, Ennin JE, Zurbrugg C, Strande L (2014) A value proposition: resource recovery from faecal sludge—can it be the driver for improved sanitation? Resour Conserv Recycl 88:S32–S38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodane PH, Mbéguéré M, Ousmane S, Strande L (2012) Capital and operating costs of full-scale faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment systems in Dakar, Senegal. Environ Sci Technol 46(7):3705–3711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dzwairo B, Hoko Z, Love D, Guzha E (2006) Assessment of the impacts of pit latrines on groundwater quality in rural areas: a case study from Marondera district. Zimbabwe Phys Chem Earth 31(15–16):779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards P (1985) Aquaculture: a component of low-cost sanitation technology. Integrated Resource Recovery. World Bank Technical Paper No. 36, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Eldridge C, Palmer N (2009) Performance-based payment: some reflections on the discourse, evidence and unanswered questions. Health Policy Plan 24(3):160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franceys R, Pickford J, Reed R (1992) A guide to the development of on-site sanitation. World Health Organization (WHO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. Frenoux C, Tsitsikalis A (2014) Domestic private fecal sludge emptying services in Cambodia: between market efficiency and regulation needs for sustainable management. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 5(1):143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galing EK, Arcenas A, Parayno PP (2008) Developing Sustainable Septage Management System for Highly Urbanized Cities (HUCs): The Case of General Santos City. Manila, Philippines, 2008. The World Bank, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  24. GoB (1998) National Policy for safe water supply & sanitation 1998. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of Bangladesh, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham JP, Polizzotto ML (2013) Pit latrines and their impacts on groundwater quality: a systematic review. http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/121/5/ehp.1206028.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2017
  26. Gulis G, Mulumba J, Juma O, Kakosova B (2004) Health status of people of slums in Nairobi, Kenya. Environ Res 96(2):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halcrow G, Yetsho T, Nguyen N, Tshering G (2014) Developing behaviour change communication for improving faecal sludge management in Bhutan. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 4:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrington W, Richard DM (2004) Economic incentives versus command and control. What’s the best approach for solving environmental problems? Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF_Resources_152_ecoincentives.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  29. Hawkins P, Muxímua O (2015) Developing business models for fecal sludge management in Maputo, Water and Sanitation Program: Report by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World BankGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawkins P, Blackett I, Heymans C (2013) Poor-inclusive urban sanitation: an overview. The World Bank/Water and Sanitation Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Helal uz Zaman AKM, Tariqul Alam KMd, Jahirul Islam Md (2010) Urbanization in Bangladesh: present status and policy implications. ASA Univ Rev 4(2):25Google Scholar
  32. Howard G, Reed BJ, McChesney D, Taylor R (2006) Human excreta and sanitation: control and protection. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/iwachap5.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2016
  33. Hutton G, Haller L (2004) Evaluation of the costs and benefits of water and sanitation improvements at the global level. Water sanitation and health; WHOGoogle Scholar
  34. Ingallinella AM, Sanguinetti G, Koottatep T, Montangero A, Strauss M (2002) The challenge of faecal sludge management in urban areas—strategies, regulations and treatment options. Water Sci Technol 46:285–294Google Scholar
  35. Iqbal S (1999) Duckweed aquaculture potentials, possibilities and limitations for combined wastewater treatment and animal feed production in developing countries. SANDEC Report No. 6/99. EAWAG, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Islam MN, Kitazawa D (2012) Modeling of freshwater wetland management strategies for building the public awareness at local level in Bangladesh. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18(4):449–470.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9369-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Islam MN, Kitazawa D, Runfola DM, Giner N (2012) Urban lakes in a developing nation: drivers, states, and impacts of water quality and quantity in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 17:253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lre.12010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Islam MN, Kitazawa D, Mannan MA, Islam MS, Tamanna S, Islam MN (2015) Modeling alternative mitigation strategies of salinity intrusion on food production by integrating SWOT and TEAM decision models Model. Earth Syst Environ 1:12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0012-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Isunju JB, Schwartz K, Schouten MA, Johnson WP, van Dijk MP (2011) Socio-economic aspects of improved sanitation in slums: a review. Public Health 125(6):368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jahan H, Muyeed AA (2015) Faecal sludge management in Bangladesh, Technical Adviser-WASH, WaterAid Bangladesh, The Daily Observer June 11. Dhaka, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  41. Jeppsson U, Hellstrom D (2002) Systems analysis for environmental assessment of urban water and wastewater systems. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):121–129Google Scholar
  42. Jimemez B, Barrios JA, Mendez JM, Diaz J (2004) Sustainable sludge management in developing countries. Water Sci Technol 49(10):251–258Google Scholar
  43. Journey WK, Skillicorn P, Spira W (1993) A new aquatic farming system for developing countries. The World Bank. Emena Technical Department Agriculture DivisionGoogle Scholar
  44. Koné D (2010) Making urban excreta and wastewater management contribute to cities’ economic development: a paradigm shift. Water Policy 12:602–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ludwig HF, Mohit K (2000) Appropriate technology for municipal sewerage/excreta management in developing countries: Thailand case study. Environmentalist 20:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lugali Yvonne Z, Ahamada B, Noble W, Joshua K, Isa K, Robert, Tumutegyereize P (2016) Modeling sludge accumulation rates in lined pit latrines in slum areas of Kampala City, Uganda. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 10(8):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mbeguere M, Gning JB, Dodane PH, Kone D (2010) Socio-economic profile and profitability of faecal sludge emptying companies. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1288–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mikhael G, Robbins DM, Ramsay JE, Mbéguérém M (2014) Methods and means for collection and transport of faecal sludge. In: Fecal sludge management: systems approach for implementation and management, vol 4. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Montgomery MA, Elimelech M (2007) Water and sanitation in developing countries: including health in the equation. Environ Sci Technol 41(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Omran A (2011) Factors influencing water treatment management performance in Malaysia: a case study in Pulau Pinang. Int J Eng 6:53–62Google Scholar
  51. Opel A (2013a) Absent faecal sludge management impacts improved sanitation coverage in Bangladesh. Wash Matters 12(3):1–7Google Scholar
  52. Opel A (2013b) Absence of faecal sludge management shatters the gains of improved sanitation coverage in Bangladesh. Sustain Sanit Pract 13(13):4–10Google Scholar
  53. Opel A, Islam KM (2014) Toilet for all is not the end of the problem. J Transp Infrastruct 1:8–17Google Scholar
  54. Opel A, Bashar MK, Ahmed MF (2011) Landscape analysis and business model assessment in faecal sludge management: extraction and transportation models in Bangladesh. Wateraid Bangladesh, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  55. Opel A, Bashar KM, Ahmed FM (2012a) Fecal sludge management in Bangladesh: an issue that needs urgent attention. Address at Asia Regional Sanitation and Hygiene Practitioners WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  56. Opel A, Bashar KM, Ahmed FM (2012b) Inefficient technology or misperceived demand: the failure of Vacutug-based pit-emptying services in Bangladesh. http://www.sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/inefficient.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2017
  57. Ortuste FR (2012) Living without sanitary sewers in latin america: the business of collecting fecal sludge in four latin American cities. Water and Sanitation Program, World BankGoogle Scholar
  58. Paar P, Rekittke J (2011) Low-cost mapping and publishing methods for landscape architectural analysis and design in slum-upgrading projects. Future Internet 3(4):228–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pickford J, Shaw R (1997) Technical brief no. 54: emptying latrine pits. Waterlines 16(2):15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pramanik AAM, Pramanik B (2011) An experience of SPACE on ecological sanitation in Bangladesh. In: 35th WEDC international conference, Loughborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahman MM (2009) Sanitation sector status and gap analysis: Bangladesh, Global Sanitation FundGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahman MM, Ali MA, Choudhury MR, Rahman MA, Redwan AM, Noor NF, Sohan AI (2015) Fecal sludge management (FSM) scenario in urban areas of Bangladesh—a case study by south. Asia Urban Knowledge Hub (K-Hub), ITN-BUET, Bangladesh National Center, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  63. Rashid UH (2007) Sludge emptying, transport, treatment: can Vacutug solve the downstream sanitation problems of Dhaka? Address at Bangladesh Sanitation WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  64. Robbin DM, Strande L, Doczi J (2012) Sludge management in developing countries: experiences from the Philippines. Water 14:22–25Google Scholar
  65. Scott R, Reed B (2006) Emptying pit latrines [Fact sheet]. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/texcom/cd050999/scott.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017
  66. Scott RE, Ross I, Hawkins PM (2016) Fecal sludge management: diagnostics for service delivery in urban areas—report of a FSM study in Hawassa, Ethiopia. World Bank Group, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  67. Strande L, Ronteltap M, Brdjanovic D (2014) Fecal sludge management: systems approach for implementation and operation, 1st edn. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Strauss M, Larmie SA, Heinss U (1997) Treatment of sludges from on-site sanitation-low cost options. Water Sci Technol 35(6):129–136Google Scholar
  69. Strauss M, Larmie SA, Heinss U, Montangero A (2000) Treating faecal sludges in ponds. Water Sci Technol 42:10–11 (pp 283–290) Google Scholar
  70. Tariq BY (2012) Bangladesh report: a review of the operation and maintenance and mechanical functionality of the MK II UN-HABITAT Vacutug Pit Latrine exhausting technology. Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  71. Thye YP, Templeton MR, Ali M (2011) A critical review of technologies for pit latrine emptying in developing countries. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(20):1793–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tilley E, Dodane PH (2014) Financial transfers and responsibility in faecal sludge management chains. In: Fecal sludge management: systems approach for implementation and management. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. United Nations (1999) World urbanisation prospects: 1999 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Working Paper No.161. United Nations Secretariat. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. USAID (2010) A rapid assessment of septage management in Asia: policies and practices in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam. USAIDGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Ryneveld MB, Fourie AB (1997) A strategy for evaluating the environmental impact of on-site sanitation systems. Water SA 23(4):279–291Google Scholar
  76. Veenstra S, van der Steen P, Gijzen H (2001) Natural wastewater treatment to stimulate the local economy. Waterlines 20(1):11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Water supply and sanitation in Bangladesh (2012) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_and_sanitation_in_Bangladesh. Accessed 19 Aug 2017
  78. WHO (1999) Infectious diseases: removing obstacles to healthy development, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  79. WSP (2013) The missing link in sanitation service delivery a review of fecal sludge management in 12 cities. The World Bank/Water and Sanitation Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  80. Yeasmin et al (2017) Piloting a low-cost hardware intervention to reduce improper disposal of solid waste in communal toilets in low-income settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 17:682.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4693-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yousuf TB, Mahmud W (2011) A study on situation analysis of business model development of faecal sludge management of faridpur municipality. Practical Action and WaterAid Banglad, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  82. Zook M, Graham M, Shelton T, Gorman S (2010) Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Med Health Policy 2(2):7–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Jakariya
    • 1
  • Asmaul Housna
    • 1
  • Md. Nazrul Islam
    • 2
  • G. U. Ahsan
    • 3
  • Khalid Mahmud
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences and ManagementNorth South UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Department of Geography and EnvironmentJahnagirnagar UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.School of Health and Life SciencesNorth South UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  4. 4.Department of Irrigation and Water ManagementBangladesh Agricultural UniversityMymensinghBangladesh

Personalised recommendations