Advertisement

Induced Mate Abundance Increases Women’s Expectations for Engagement Ring Size and Cost

  • Ashley Locke
  • Jessica Desrochers
  • Steven ArnockyEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Research on some non-human species suggests that an abundance of reproductively viable males relative to females can increase female choosiness and preferences for longer-term mating and resource investment by males. Yet little research has explored the potential influence of mate availability upon women’s preferences for signals of men’s commitment and resource provisioning. Using an experimental mate availability priming paradigm, the present study examined whether women (N = 205) primed with either mate scarcity or abundance would differ in their expectations for engagement ring size and cost. Results demonstrated that women who were primed with the belief that good-quality mates are abundant in the population reported expecting a statistically-significantly larger and more expensive engagement ring relative to women primed with mate scarcity. Results suggest that women flexibly attune their expectations for signals of men’s investment based, in part, upon their perception of the availability of viable mates.

Keywords

Priming Sex ratio Engagement rings Social psychology Evolutionary psychology Mating behavior 

Notes

Funding Information

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Development Grant (file # DDG-2017-00013) awarded to S. Arnocky.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Ghossainy, M. E., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Experimentally inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Gem Society. (n.d.). The history of the diamond as an engagement ring. Retrieved on April 2 2019 from: https://www.americangemsociety.org/page/diamondasengagement.
  3. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: a review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978–1–63463-131-0.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnocky, S., Woodruff, N. W., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Men’s sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate-availability. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 172–181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman, P. W. (1997). Operational sex ratio, female competition and mate choice in the Ephippigerine Bushcricket Steropleurus stali Bolivar. Journal of Orthoptera Research, (6), 101–104.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3503541.
  7. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and context. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cloud, J. M., & Taylor, M. H. (2019). The effect of mate value discrepancy on hypothetical engagement ring purchases. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0156-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronk, L., & Dunham, B. (2007). Amounts spent on engagement rings reflect aspects of male and female mate quality. Human Nature, 18(4), 329–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9018-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond Council of America. (2010). Bridal jewelry: advanced jewelry sales 6. Retrieved on June 3 2019 from: https://www.diamondcouncil.org/Documents/CourseMaterials/AJS/Lesson6.pdf.
  12. Dubuis, A. (2015). Marriage proposal flops after man’s girlfriend says diamond is TOO SMALL. Daily Mirror. Retrieved on April 11 2019 from: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/marriage-proposal-flops-after-mans-7053841.
  13. Emlen, S., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300), 215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fayant, M. P., Sigall, H., Lemonnier, A., Retsin, E., & Alexopoulos, T. (2017). On the limitations of manipulation checks: an obstacle toward cumulative science. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 125–130.  https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foschi, M. (2014). Hypotheses, operationalizations, and manipulation checks. In M. J. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 247–268). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404681-8.00011-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauser, D. J., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 998.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2017). Modern-day female preferences for resources and provisioning by long-term mates. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 242–261.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jirotkul, M. (1999). Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male–male competition in guppies. Animal Behavior, 58(2), 287–294.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lench, H. C., Taylor, A. B., & Bench, S. W. (2014). An alternative approach to analysis of mental states in experimental social cognition research. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 215–228.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0351-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.947.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Marlowe, F. W., & Berbesque, J. C. (2012). The human operational sex ratio: effects of marriage, concealed ovulation, and menopause on mate competition. Journal of Human Evolution, 63(6), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milan, A. (2011). Marital status: overview 2011. Components of statistics Canada, report on the demographic situation in Canada. Retrieved on March 18 2019 from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91-209-x/2013001/article/11788-eng.htm.
  25. Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Passos, C., Tassino, B., Reyes, F., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2014). Seasonal variation in female mate choice and operational sex ratio in wild populations of an annual fish, Austrolebias reicherti. PLoS One, 9, e101649.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101649.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. RateSupermarket.ca Team. (2019). The cost of love in Canada study 2018. Retrieved on July 2 2019 from: https://www.ratesupermarket.ca/blog/the-cost-of-love-in-canada-2018/.
  28. Ross, J. (2017).This is the average engagement ring spend in 2017. The Knot. Retrieved on March 27 2019 from: https://www.theknot.com/content/the-knot-2017-jewelry-and-engagement-study.
  29. Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift giving among young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 765–784.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schweingruber, D., Cast, A. D., & Anahita, S. (2008). “A story and a ring”: audience judgments about engagement proposals. Sex Roles, 58(3–4), 165–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9330-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spielmann, S., MacDonald, G., & Wilson, A. (2009). On the rebound: focusing on someone new helps anxiously attached individuals let go of ex-partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1382–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Maxwell, J. A., Joel, S., Peragine, D., Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2013). Settling for less out of fear of being single. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1049–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stone, E. A., Shakelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: a cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288–296.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.357.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: preferences for long- and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 82–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from “lonely hearts” advertisements. Behaviour, 132(9), 755–779.Google Scholar
  36. Zaleski, J. (2015). How long is too long to be engaged? The Knot. Retrieved on May 15 2019 from: https://www.theknot.com/content/too-long-to-be-engaged.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Locke
    • 1
  • Jessica Desrochers
    • 1
  • Steven Arnocky
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Nipissing UniversityNorth BayCanada

Personalised recommendations