Advertisement

Pecuniary Sanctions Against Issuers in European Capital Market Law: Harming the Protected Investors?

  • Vassilios D. TountopoulosEmail author
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

There is a wide consensus in European capital market law that a sound legal framework for the financial sector should rest on a strong supervisory and sanctioning regime. According to this rationale and following the paradigm of competition law, the new legal framework in European capital market law provides for high-magnitude pecuniary sanctions. The new sanctioning regime does not entail special provisions for issuers. However, sanctions imposed on legal entities are of a higher magnitude than sanctions imposed on natural persons. We claim that the imposition of high-magnitude pecuniary sanctions on issuers for violations of capital market law provisions as such does not have the deterrent effect that it is thought to have and, under specific circumstances, can work against the protection of investors. Moreover, the sanctioning provisions of competition law must be examined carefully before being considered as a paradigm for the structure of sanctions against issuers under capital market law. Furthermore, we claim that in cases where innocent investors are harmed, capital market law should resolve the dilemma between entity and manager liability by choosing the latter.

Keywords

European capital market law Enforcement Pecuniary sanctions Deterrence Issuers Protected investors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank my colleagues Evanghelos Perakis and Martin Winner as well as the reviewers of EBOR for useful comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are mine.

References

  1. Andenas M, Chiu I (2013) The foundations and future of financial regulation. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlen J, Carney W (1992) Vicarious liability for fraud on securities markets: theories and evidence. Univ Ill Law Rev 1992:691–740Google Scholar
  3. Armour J et al (2016) Principles of financial regulation. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Armour J, Mayer C, Polo A (2017) Regulatory sanctions and reputational damage in financial markets. J Financ Quant Anal 2017:1429–1448Google Scholar
  5. Arons T (2015) Judicial protection of supervised credit institutions in the European Banking Union. In: Busch D, Ferrarini G (eds) European Banking Union. OUP, Oxford, pp 433–474Google Scholar
  6. Arsalidou D (2016) Rethinking corporate governance in financial institutions. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Athanassiou P (2011) Bank supervisors’ liability: a European perspective. Yearb Eur Law 30:213–254Google Scholar
  8. Barnard J (2004) SEC debarment of officers and directors after Sarbanes-Oxley. Bus Law 59:391–419Google Scholar
  9. Bayer W (2009) Legalitätspflicht der Unternehmensleitung, nützliche Gesetzesverstöße und Regress bei verhängten Sanktionen—dargestellt am Beispiel von Kartellverstößen. In: Bitter G et al (eds) Festschrift für Karsten Schmidt. Schmidt, Cologne, pp 85–104Google Scholar
  10. Bayreuther F (2015) Haftung von Organen und Arbeitnehmern für Unternehmensgeldbußen. NZA 2015:1239–1243Google Scholar
  11. Becker R, Canzler S (2014) Die WpHG-Bußgeldleitlinien der BaFin—Eine Übersicht unter Berücksichtigung erster praktischer Erfahrungen. NZG 2014:1090–1096Google Scholar
  12. Carlson J (2009) Securities fraud, officer and directors bars, and the ‘unfitness’ inquiry after Sarbanes-Oxley. Fordham J Corp Financ Lse 14:679–708Google Scholar
  13. Coffee J (2006) Reforming the securities class action: an essay on deterrence and its implementation. Columbia Law Rev 106:1534–1586Google Scholar
  14. Couret A (2012) La distinction sanction/réparation. In: Reygrobellet A, Huet N (eds) Les sanctions des sociétés cotées. Lexis Nexis, Paris, pp 199–243Google Scholar
  15. Cox J (1997) Making securities fraud class actions virtuous. Ariz Law Rev 39:497–524Google Scholar
  16. Dannecker G, Biermann J (2012) Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003. In: Immenga U, Mestmäcker E (eds) Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 1. EU/Teil 1. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies P (2007) Review of issuer liability: final report. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies P (2018) Damages actions by investors on the back of market disclosure. In: Busch D, Avgouleas E, Ferrarini G (eds) Capital markets union in Europe. OUP, Oxford, pp 318–337Google Scholar
  19. Dempegiotis S (2008) The hard-to-drive tandem of immunity and liability of supervisory authorities: legal framework and corresponding legal issues. J Bank Regul 9:131–149Google Scholar
  20. Dijkstra R (2012) Liability of financial supervisory authorities. J Eur Tort Law 2012:346–377Google Scholar
  21. Dougan M (2012) From the velvet clove to the iron fist: criminal sanctions for the enforcement of Union Law. In: Cremona M (ed) Compliance and the enforcement of EU law. OUP, Oxford, pp 74–131Google Scholar
  22. Easterbrook F, Fischel D (1996) The economic structure of corporate law. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein R (1973) A theory of strict liability. J Legal Stud 2:151–204Google Scholar
  24. Fisch J (2009) Confronting the circularity problem in private securities litigation. Wis Law Rev 2009:333–350Google Scholar
  25. Fleischer H (2014a) Ruinöse Managerhaftung: Reaktionsmöglichkeiten de lege lata und de lege ferenda. ZIP 35:1305–1316Google Scholar
  26. Fleischer H (2014b) Regresshaftung von Geschäftsleitern wegen Verbandsgeldbußen. DB 2014:345–352Google Scholar
  27. Fritz H (2017) Haftungsbeschränkung bei Führungskräften. NZA 2017:673–679Google Scholar
  28. Grünewald B (2016) Die Abwälzung von Bußgeldern, Verbands- und Vertragsstrafen im Wege des Regresses. NZG 2016:1121–1124Google Scholar
  29. Hadjiemmanuil C (1997) Civil liability of regulatory authorities after the Three Rivers case. Public Law 1997:32–42Google Scholar
  30. Hannigan B (2016) Company law. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2004) What is corporate law? In: Kraakman R et al (eds) The anatomy of corporate law. OUP, Oxford, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  32. Hellgardt A (2008) Kapitalmarktdeliktsrecht. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  33. Hellgardt A (2014) Comparing apples and oranges? Public, private, tax and criminal law instruments in financial markets regulation. In: Ringe W, Huber P (eds) Legal challenges in the global financial crisis. Hart, Oxford, pp 157–176Google Scholar
  34. Hopt K (1975) Der Kapitalanlegerschutz im Recht der Banken. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  35. Hovenkamp H (2003) Antitrust violations in securities markets. J Corp Law 28:607–634Google Scholar
  36. Huet N (2012) Les sanctions administratives prononcées par l’Autorité des marchés financiers a l’encontre des émetteurs et/ou de leurs dirigeants. In: Reygrobellet A, Huet N (eds) Les sanctions des sociétés cotées. Lexis Nexis, Paris, pp 245–285Google Scholar
  37. Jones R (2013) Unfit for duty: the officer and director bar as a remedy for fraud. Univ Cin Law Rev 82:439–464Google Scholar
  38. Kalss S, Oppitz M, Zollner J (2015) Kapitalmarktrecht. Linde, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  39. Kämmerer J (2010) Geldbußen im Wettbewerbs- und Kapitalmarktrecht. In: Grundmann S et al (eds) Festschrift für Klaus J. Hopt. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 2043–2059Google Scholar
  40. Kling J (2010–2011) Securities regulation in the shadow of the antitrust laws: the case for a broad implied immunity doctrine. Yale Law J 120:910–954Google Scholar
  41. Klöhn L (2011) Private versus public enforcement of laws—a law and economics perspective. In: Schulze R (ed) Compensation of private losses. Sellier, Munich, pp 179–198Google Scholar
  42. Klusmann M (2016) Sanktionsrisiken im Kartellrecht. ZGR 2016:252–270Google Scholar
  43. Kornhauser L (1982) An economic analysis of the choice between enterprise and personal liability for accidents. Calif Law Rev 70:1345–1392Google Scholar
  44. Kraakman R (1984) Corporate liability strategies and the costs of legal controls. Yale Law J 93:857–900Google Scholar
  45. Langevoort D (1996) Capping damages for open—market securities fraud. Ariz Law Rev 38:639–664Google Scholar
  46. Langevoort D (2007) On leaving corporate executives ‘naked, homeless and without wheels’: corporate fraud, equitable remedies, and the debate over entity versus individual liability. Wake For Law Rev 42:627–661Google Scholar
  47. Lim E (2013a) A critique of corporate attribution: ‘directing mind and will’ and corporate objectives. JBL 2013:333–353Google Scholar
  48. Lim E (2013b) The illegality defence and company law. JCLS 13:49–61Google Scholar
  49. MacNeil I (2015) Enforcement and sanctioning. In: Moloney N, Ferran E, Payne J (eds) The Oxford handbook of financial regulation. OUP, Oxford, pp 280–306Google Scholar
  50. Mahoney P (1992) Precaution costs and the law of fraud in impersonal markets. Va Law Rev 78:623–670Google Scholar
  51. McNew S (2009) Money penalties against publicly held companies: a proposal for restraint. Secur Regul Law J 37:48–73Google Scholar
  52. Mitchell L (2009) The ‘innocent shareholder’: an essay on compensation and deterrence in securities class-action lawsuits. Wis Law Rev 2009:243–295Google Scholar
  53. Moloney N (2010) How to protect investors. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Nartowska U, Walla F (2014) Das Sanktionsregime für Verstöße gegen die Beteiligungstransparenz nach der Transparenzrichtlinie 2013. AG 2014:891–905Google Scholar
  55. Nartowska U, Walla F (2015) Die WpHG Bußgeldleitlinien der BaFin. NZG 2015:977–983Google Scholar
  56. Nolan D (2013) The liability of financial supervisory authorities. J Eur Tort Law 4:190–222Google Scholar
  57. Oulds M (2011) Regelungsziele des Kapitalmarktrechts. In: Kümpel S, Wittig A (eds) Bank- und Kapitalmarktrecht. Otto Schmidt, Cologne, pp 1826–1844Google Scholar
  58. Poelzig D (2016) Durchsetzung und Sanktionierung des neuen Marktmissbrauchsrechts. NZG 2016:492–502Google Scholar
  59. Posner R (1973) Strict liability: a comment. J Legal Stud 2:205–221Google Scholar
  60. Priest G (1988–1989) Insurability and punitive damages. Ala Law Rev 40:1009–1036Google Scholar
  61. Reichert J (2013) Existenzgefährdung bei der Durchsetzung von Organhaftungsansprüchen. ZHR 177:756–781Google Scholar
  62. Robertson A (2015) Pulling the Twigger: directors and employees back in the firing line for damages after Jetivia in the Supreme Court? ECLR 2015:325–326Google Scholar
  63. Rönnau T, Wegner K (2014) Reform des Rechts der Verbandssanktionen—europäische und internationale Vorgaben. ZRP 2014:158–163Google Scholar
  64. Rosenberg D (2007) The judicial posner on negligence versus strict liability: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. Am Cyanamid Co. Harv Law Rev 120:1210–1222Google Scholar
  65. Rossi F (2003) Tort liability of financial regulators. A comparative study of Italian and English law in a European context. EBLR 14:643–672Google Scholar
  66. Seibt C (2015) 20 Thesen zur Binnenverantwortung im Unternehmen im Lichte des reformierten Kapitalmarktsanktionsrechts. NZG 2015:1097–1103Google Scholar
  67. Seibt C, Wollenschläger B (2014a) Revision des Marktmissbrauchsrechts durch Marktmissbrauchsverordnung und Richtlinie über strafrechtliche Sanktionen für Marktmanipulation. AG 2014:593–608Google Scholar
  68. Seibt C, Wollenschläger B (2014b) Revision des Europäischen Transparenzregimes: Regelungsinhalte der TRL 2013 und Umsetzungsbedarf. ZIP 35:545–554Google Scholar
  69. Sextro G (1985–1986) Corporate insurability of punitive damages arising from employee acts. J Corp Law 11:99–122Google Scholar
  70. Shavell S (1980) Strict liability versus negligence. J Legal Stud 9:1–25Google Scholar
  71. Shavell S (2004) Foundations of economic analysis of law. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  72. Skeel D (2000–2001) Shaming in corporate law. Univ Pa Law Rev 149:1811–1868Google Scholar
  73. Spindler G (2013) Organhaftung in der AG—Reformbedarf aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive. AG 2013:889–904Google Scholar
  74. Spitz N (2010) La réparation des préjudices boursiers. RB édition, ParisGoogle Scholar
  75. Steinway S (2014) SEC ‘monetary penalties speak very loudly’, but what do they say? A critical analysis of the SEC’s new enforcement approach. Yale Law J 124:209–232Google Scholar
  76. Stone C (1980) The place of enterprise liability in the control of corporate conduct. Yale Law J 90:1–77Google Scholar
  77. Sykes A (1981) An efficiency analysis of vicarious liability under the law of agency. Yale Law J 91:168–206Google Scholar
  78. Sykes A (1984) The economics of vicarious liability. Yale Law J 93:1231–1282Google Scholar
  79. Teigelack J, Dolff C (2016) Kapitalmarktrechtliche Sanktionen nach dem Regierungsentwurf eines Ersten Finanzmarktnovellierungsgesetzes—1. FimanoG. BB 2016:387–393Google Scholar
  80. Thomas S (2015) Bußgeldregress, Übelszufügung und D&O-Versicherung. NZG 2015:1409–1419Google Scholar
  81. Tison M (2005) Do not attack the watchdog! Banking Supervisor’s liability after Peter Paul. CMLR 42:639–675Google Scholar
  82. Tountopoulos V (2012) Rückkaufprogramme und Safe-Harbor-Regelungen im Europäischen Kapitalmarktrecht. EWS 2012:449–456Google Scholar
  83. Tountopoulos V (2014a) Market abuse and private enforcement. ECFR 2014:297–332Google Scholar
  84. Tountopoulos V (2014b) Anlegerschutz bei unterlassenem Pflichtangebot im Europäischen Kapitalmarktrecht. WM 2014:337–346Google Scholar
  85. Tountopoulos V (2015) Capital market law. Sakkoulas, Athens (in Greek) Google Scholar
  86. Veil R (2016) Sanktionsrisiken für Emittenten und Geschäftsleiter im Kapitalmarktrecht. ZGR 2016:305–328Google Scholar
  87. Veil R (2017a) Concept and aims of capital markets regulation. In: Veil R (ed) European capital markets law. Hart, Oxford, pp 23–29Google Scholar
  88. Veil R (2017b) Sanctions. In: Veil R (ed) European capital markets law. Hart, Oxford, pp 169–179Google Scholar
  89. Veil R, Brüggemeier A (2015) Kapitalmarktrecht zwischen öffentlich-rechtlicher und privatrechtlicher Normdurchsetzung. In: Fleischer H, Kalss S, Vogt H-U (eds) Enforcement im Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 277–309Google Scholar
  90. Vervessos N (2014) Das naming und shaming als Sanktion gegen kapitalmarktrechtliches Fehlverhalten. In: Hopt K, Tzouganatos D (eds) Das Europäische Wirtschaftsrecht vor neuen Herausforderungen. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 149–182Google Scholar
  91. Von Buttlar J (2014) Die Stärkung der Aufsichts- und Santions-befugnisse im EU-Kapitalmarktrecht: ein ‘neues field of dreams’ für Regulierer? BB 2014:451–458Google Scholar
  92. Walden A (1985) The publicly held corporation and the insurability of punitive damages. Fordham Law Rev 53:1383–1408Google Scholar
  93. Wan W (2016) The illegality defence in corporate law claims against directors and officers. Hong Kong Law J 46:225–254Google Scholar
  94. Watts P (2011) Illegality and agency law: authorising illegal action. JBL 2011:213–228Google Scholar
  95. Wilhelmi R (2017) Beschränkung der Organhaftung und innerbetrieblicher Schadensausgleich. NZG 2017:681–690Google Scholar
  96. Williams R (2007) Disqualifying directors: a remedy worse than the disease? JCLS 7:213–242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the AegeanChiosGreece

Personalised recommendations