The Individual Creditor’s Right to Hold a Corporate Shareholder Liable for an Insolvent Company’s Obligations Outside Bankruptcy Proceedings: The Lithuanian View

  • Lina MikalonienėEmail author


Lively discussions on civil liability of companies’ directors towards the creditors of financially distressed companies have been going on for decades. Recent trends in Lithuanian case law, however, show that, in parallel, creditors of private limited liability companies have also shifted their focus to other real masters of business—controlling shareholders—by, rather aggressively, enforcing shareholders’ liability for obligations of insolvent companies. Since recovery rates of unsecured creditors in insolvent liquidations are rather modest, creditors seek to by-pass collective bankruptcy proceedings and bring actions against the abusive shareholder exclusively for their own benefit outside bankruptcy proceedings. Based on comparative examples, the article aims to analyse and evaluate the Lithuanian legal framework by addressing the standing of an individual creditor to hold an abusive corporate shareholder liable for an insolvent company’s obligations from the perspective of competing damage claims between an individual creditor and a bankruptcy administrator. The analysis includes both ordinary and fraudulent bankruptcies.


Creditor protection Insolvent companies Shareholder liability Direct damage of creditors Locus standi of bankruptcy administrator 



My thanks to Daiva Gauryte for the assistance with proofreading the text of the article.


  1. Armour J, Hertig G, Kanda H (2009) Transactions with creditors. In: Kraakman RH et al (eds) The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 115–151Google Scholar
  2. Bainbridge SM (2001) Abolishing veil piercing. J Corp Law 26:479–536Google Scholar
  3. Bauen M, Bernet R (2007) Swiss company limited by shares: company law, merger law, stock exchange law, tax law. Bruylant, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  4. Borch O, Petersen LL (gen eds) (2015) Debt restructuring: an alternative to insolvency proceedings; jurisdictional comparisons. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell D (gen ed) (1993) Liability of corporate directors. Lloyd’s of London Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke B (2017) The duties of parent companies. In: Birkmose HS (ed) Shareholders’ duties. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 229–254Google Scholar
  7. Declercq PJM (2002) Netherlands insolvency law: the Netherlands Bankruptcy Act and the most important legal concepts. Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faber NED, Vermunt NSGJ, Kilborn J, Richter T (eds) (2012) Commencement of insolvency proceedings, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Fletcher IF (2017) The law of insolvency, 5th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Goode RM (2011) Principles of corporate insolvency law, 4th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London (student edn) Google Scholar
  11. Keay A (2005) Wrongful trading and the liability of company directors: a theoretical perspective. Legal Stud 25:431–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleindiek D (2008) Abuse of the GmbH by organized corporate gravediggers. Eur Co Law 5:237–240Google Scholar
  13. Merkt H, Spindler G (2006) Direct liability of controlling parties (piercing the corporate veil) and related legal constellations. In: Lutter M (ed) Legal capital in Europe. De Gruyter Recht, Berlin, pp 166–231Google Scholar
  14. Mikalonienė L (2015) Uždarosios akcinės bendrovės akcininko teisės ir jų gynimo būdai [Shareholder rights and remedies in a closed stock company]. Monografija [Monograph]. VĮ Registrų centras, VilniusGoogle Scholar
  15. Mikalonienė L (2016) Uždarosios akcinės bendrovės akcininko civilinė atsakomybė bendrovės kreditoriams, bendrovei ir kitiems akcininkams [Civil liability of shareholder of a closed stock company towards company’s creditors, the company and fellow shareholders]. Monografija [Monograph]. Justitia, VilniusGoogle Scholar
  16. Muller MH (2013) Corporate law in the Netherlands, 3rd edn. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (rev and updated) Google Scholar
  17. Müller KJ (2016) The GmbH: a guide to the German limited liability company, 3rd edn. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  18. Singhof B (1999) Equity holders’ liability for limited liability companies’ unrecoverable debts—reflection on piercing the corporate veil under German law. Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law Rev 22:143–174Google Scholar
  19. Sørensen A (ed) (1999) Directors’ liabilities in case of insolvency, 1st edn. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson RB (1991) Piercing the corporate veil: an empirical study. Cornell Law Rev 76:1036–1074Google Scholar
  21. Van den Braak S (2008) Creditor protection at the crossroads of company and insolvency law: the Dutch example. Eur Co Law 5:229–236Google Scholar
  22. Vandekerckhove K (2007) Piercing the corporate veil. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  23. Ventoruzzo M et al (2015) Comparative corporate law. West Acad. Publ, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  24. Vucurovic TB (2007) Civil liability of company directors and creditor protection in the vicinity of insolvency: comparative analysis based on the Swiss and English systems. Schulthess, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  25. Weerts P, Constant C (2008) Report from Belgium. Eur Co Law 5:241–243Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associate ProfessorFaculty of Law, Vilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations