Advertisement

Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 11, Issue 2–3, pp 383–388 | Cite as

Two Threats to the Rule of Law: Legal and Epistemic (Between Technocracy and Populism)

  • Gianluigi PalombellaEmail author
Essay
  1. 1.

    Joseph Raz wrote that as a ‘negative’ value, the rule of law minimizes the dangers that the law might itself create (Raz 1979, 224). It is true, for example, that conceptions of ‘law and order’ are at odds with the rule of law (Cheesman 2015). In more than one sense, a first threat to the rule of law (RoL) can realistically be of a legal nature. In this scenario the rule by law reigns, and it might still be mistaken as the rule of law. An example of this can be, as we shall see below, ‘populist governments’.

    A second scenario where a threat surfaces instead seems to be rather opaque and is not even associated with any actual ‘power’. It relates to the new governance structures on a transnational scale, and the protagonists are epistemic authorities.

    The two threats work jointly or through opposite routes, at times unnoticed in the list of RoL concerns.

    The first scenario:One general problem with the theoretical definitions of the RoL is our reluctance to ‘distinguish’ its notion...

Notes

References

  1. Chalmers D (2009) Gauging the Cumbersomeness of EUI Law. LSE WP 2Google Scholar
  2. Cheesman N (2015) Opposing the rule of law: how Myanmar’s courts make law and order. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hobbes T (1946) [1651] Leviathan, edited by M. Oakeshott. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Koskenniemi M (2011) The politics of international law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Krygier M (2000) Ethical positivism and the liberalism of fear. In: Campbell T, Goldsworthy J (eds) Judicial powers, democracy and legal positivism. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 59–87Google Scholar
  6. Krygier M (2009) The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. In: Palombella G, Walker N (eds) Relocating the rule of law. Hart, Oxford, pp 45–69Google Scholar
  7. Krygier M (2011) ‘Four puzzles about the rule of law: why, what, where? And who cares?' [Nomos]. Getting to the Rule Law 50:64–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krygier K (2016) The rule of law: pasts, presents, and two possible futures. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 12:199–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krygier M (2017a) Reimagining the rule of law. [Paper presented at] Denis Leslie Mahoney Prize Public Lecture, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  10. Krygier M (2017b) Tempering power. In: Adams M, Meuwese A, Hirch Ballin E (eds) Constitutionalism and the rule of law: bridging idealism and realism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 34–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mendes J (2014) Rule of law and participation: a normative analysis of internationalized rule-making as composite procedure. Int J Constit Law 12(2):370–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Palombella G (2016) The rule of law at home and abroad. Hague J Rule Law 8(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Palombella G (2018) Illiberal, democratic, non arbitrary? Epicenter and circumstances of a rule of law crisis. Hague J Rule Law 10(1):5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raz J (1979) The rule of law and its virtue. Id. The authority of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 210–229Google Scholar
  15. Raz J (2009) Between authority and interpretation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sant’Anna School of Advanced StudiesPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations