Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 35–57 | Cite as

The Sociology of (Slovenian) Constitutional Democracy

Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This article puts in the centre the increasingly notable discrepancy between constitutional democracy as a form and its actual practice in Central Europe, with a particular focus on Slovenia. It does so by following Martin Krygier who has long insisted with regard to the rule of law that “we would do well to explore […] the sociology of the rule of law.” As he has noted, “this is a social science that does not quite yet exist”. As a result, especially lawyers have satisfied themselves with studying the rule of law in conceptual terms, limiting themselves to drawing a laundry list of formal requirements that an ideal concept of the rule of law should meet here and there, indeed everywhere. What has been too often neglected, however, by academics and institutional actors alike, is a social dimension of the rule of law. The formal legal-institutional architecture of the rule of law has too often ignored the broader social context, wherein, rather than in the legal institutions themselves, lies “a great deal that matters most to whether law can rule.” The same conclusion as to the rule of law can be applied to a wider notion of constitutional democracy. Lest we are left with a partial, superficial or even flawed understanding of the concept, our focus must be centred on the constitutive social considerations of constitutional democracy. The latter’s sociological dimension shall not remain outside legal theory, as it has been too often the case so far. To prevent that this article explores the following question: what is it in the Central European societies, such as Hungary, Poland and Slovenia, that inhibits the formal infrastructure of constitutional democracy to deliver its intended effects in practice? In pursuit of the answers, the article will be broken down into three parts. First, we are going to explain the concept of constitutional democracy as it has developed both in the Slovenian constitutional practice and in theory. Having passed the conceptual threshold, the next part will outline the main elements of the sociology of constitutional democracy, as applied to the Slovenian case. Of course, due to the space constraints the discussion will be necessarily schematic and will be used to respond to the main research question of this article, which boils to the identification of the main social factors that hinder the actual emergence of constitutional democracy in Slovenia. Finally, the article will close down with some normative proposals for improving the state of constitutional democracy in Central Europe in the not so distant future.

Keywords

Constitutional democracy Crisis Sociology Rule of law Homo sovieticus 

References

  1. Adam F and Tomšič M (2000) Transition Elites: Catalysts of Social Innovation or Rent Seekers. Družboslovne razprave 32:223–245Google Scholar
  2. Alić M (2013) Nihče. Cankarjeva založba, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  3. Avbelj M (2011) Zgodovinska odločitev ustavnega sodišča. Pravna praksa 30:39/40Google Scholar
  4. Avbelj M (2013) Slovenija kot demokratična in pravna država. In Avbelj M et al. (eds), Evropska Slovenija. Nova RevijaGoogle Scholar
  5. Avbelj M (2016) Institucionalno gnitje Slovenije. https://www.finance.si/8846319/Mit-9-Institucionalno-gnitje-Slovenije
  6. Avbelj M (2017) Država über alles in homo slovenicus. https://www.finance.si/8856061
  7. Avbelj M (2017) How to reform the rule of law in Slovenia. In Adam F (ed) Slovenia: social, economic and environmental issues. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 71-84Google Scholar
  8. Balkin JM (1992) What is a post-modern constitutionalism. Michigan Law Review 90Google Scholar
  9. Blokker P (2012) Constitutions and democracy in post-national times: a political-sociological approach. Ir J Sociol 20(2):68–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blokker P (2014) New democracies in crisis: a comparative constitutional study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Blokker P (2016) EU democratic oversight and domestic deviation from the rule of law: sociological reflections. In: Kochenov C (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the european union. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Blokker P, Thornhill C (2017) Sociological constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunkhorst H (2014) Critical theory of legal revolutions: evolutionary perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Bugarič B, Kuhelj A (2015) Slovenia in crisis: a tale of unfinished democratization in East-Central Europe. Communist Post-Communist Stud 48(2015):274Google Scholar
  15. Burger A, Kunčič A (2014) Slovenian economy between ‘National Interest’ and the European Market. Studia Historica Slovenia 14(1):137–156Google Scholar
  16. Djilas M (1957) The new class: an analysis of the communist system. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission (2017) Special Eurobarometer 461. European Union 1–70Google Scholar
  18. Fukuyama F (1996) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gudkov LD (2008) »Soviet Man « in the sociology of Iurii Levada. Sociol Res 47:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudkov L (2010) Conditions necessary for the reproduction of » Soviet Man«. Sociol Res 49(6):50–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habermas J (1995) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. J Philos 92:3Google Scholar
  22. Habermas J (2001) Constitutional democracy: a paradoxical union of contradictory principles. Political Theory 29:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halik T, Havel V, John Paul II, » homo sovieticus « . http://www.europaeum.org/files/lectures/OXFORD%20LECTURE%20Tomas%20Halik.pdf
  24. Hart HLA (1963) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Havel V (1989) The power of powerless. In: Havel V (ed) Living in truth. Faber and Faber, London, p 45Google Scholar
  26. Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) (2017) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Kjaer P (2014) Constitutionalism in the global realm: a sociological approach. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Kochenov D (2008) EU enlargement and the failure of conditionality: pre-accession conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law. Kluwer Law International, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Krygier M (2008) The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. In: Palombella G, Walker N (eds) Re-locating the rule of law. Hart Publishers, Oxford, pp 45–70Google Scholar
  30. Krygier M (2014) Inside the Rule of Law. Rivista di filosofia del diritto III 1:77–98Google Scholar
  31. Kuhar M, Črnič TO (2015) in Council of Europe. Perspectives on Youth 2:32–50Google Scholar
  32. Münch R (1984) Die Struktur der Moderne: Grundmunster und differenitelle Gestaltung des institutionellen Aufbaus der modernen Gesellschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  33. Palombella G (2009) The rule of law and its core. In: Palombella G, Walker N (eds) Re-locating the rule of law. Hart Publishers, Oxford, pp 17–42Google Scholar
  34. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja (2014) Politbarometer 6:1–33Google Scholar
  35. Přibaň J (2009) From ‘Which Rule of Law?’ to ‘The Rule of Which Law?’: post-communist experiences of European legal integration’. Hague J Rule Law 1(2):337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Přibaň J (2012) Constitutionalism as fear of the political? A comparative analysis of Teubner’s constitutional fragments and Thornhill’s a sociology of constitutions. J Law Soc 39(3):441–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rawls J (1995) Political liberalism: reply to Habermas. J Philos 92:3Google Scholar
  38. Rosenfeld M (2001) The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy. Southern California Law Rev 74:1307–1352Google Scholar
  39. Scheppele KL (2003) Constitutional negotiations, political contexts of judicial activism in Post-Soviet Europe. Int Sociol 18:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sciulli D (1992) Theory of societal constitutionalism: foundations of a non-marxist critical theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Skapska G (2011) From ‘Civil Society’ to ‘Europe’. A sociological study on constitutionalism after communism. Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Šorli M (2013) Neučinkovit sodni sistem—uspešno vodenje? Pravna praksa 3:3Google Scholar
  43. Teubner G (2012) Constitutional fragments. Societal constitutionalism and globalization. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teubner G (2013) The project of constitutional sociology: irritating nation state constitutionalism. Trans Legal Theory 4(1):44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thornhill C (2011) A Sociology of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomšič M (2006) Kulturne značilnosti slovenskih elit v luči evropskih integracijskih procesov. Družboslovne razprave XXII 51:73–91Google Scholar
  47. Tully J (2017) The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy. MLR 65:2Google Scholar
  48. Zobec J, Letnar Černič J (2015) The remains of the authoritarian mentality within the slovene judiciary. In: Bobek M (ed) Central European judges under the European influence: the transformative power of the EU revisited. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Associate Professor of European Law, Graduate School of Government and European StudiesNova Univerza in SloveniaKranjSlovenia

Personalised recommendations