Advertisement

Revisiting the Matthew and Hunter Islands Dispute in Light of the Recent Chagos Advisory Opinion and Some Other Relevant Cases: An Evaluation of Vanuatu’s Claims relating to the Right to Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity, Unlawful Occupation and State Responsibility Under International Law

  • Morsen MossesEmail author
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the legal implications of the Chagos Advisory Opinion and some other relevant cases on the Matthew and Hunter Islands dispute. In doing so, the piece attempts to evaluate Vanuatu’s claims relating to the right to self-determination of the people of New Hebrides (Ni-Vans since 1980), the territorial integrity of New Hebrides/Vanuatu and the alleged unlawful occupation of the Matthew and Hunter Islands by France. First, the article submits that by transferring the administration of these islands to New Caledonia in 1976 France may have violated the territorial integrity of Vanuatu and the right to self-determination of its people. The article then considers the competing claims of sovereignty over these Islands and argues that the right to self-determination is likely to prevail over France’s claims of, inter alia, effectivités. The article submits therefore that France may be under an obligation to cease its unlawful occupation of these Islands.

Keywords

Right to self-determination Territorial integrity Effectivités Wrongful act State responsibility Matthew and Hunter 

Notes

References

  1. Abass A (2014) International law: texts, cases and materials, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen S (2019) The Chagos Advisory Opinion and the decolonization of Mauritius. ASIL Insights 23(2). https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/23/issue/2/chagos-advisory-opinion-and-decolonization-mauritius. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  3. Borsa P, Baudat-Franceschi J (2009) Mission ornitologique aux îles Mathiew et Hunter, 19–23 Janvier 2009. Institut de Recherche et de Développement. https://hal.ird.fr/ird-00666118. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  4. Bouchard C, Crumplin W (2011) Two faces of France: ‘France of the Indian Ocean’/‘France in the Indian Ocean’. J Indian Ocean Region 7:161–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2011.637423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassese A (1995) Self-determination of peoples—a legal reappraisal. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Condamin M (1978) Compte rendu de Mission aux îles Walpole, Mathieu et Hunter (6-8.12.1977; 4.1.1978). Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-mer. http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_5/b_fdi_30-30/32237.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  7. Crawford J (2006) Creation of states in international law, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson R (1971) Self-determination. AJIL 65(3):459–475.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2198970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher D (2013) France in the South Pacific: power and politics. ANU, CanberraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fonfreyde C, Simoni P, Colombani N, Buteau JF, Huruguen C, Bachy P, Baudat-Francesci J, Vuki N, Desgrippes C, Hnaije G (2013) Matthew et Hunter—Mission de Suivi Terrestre. Service de la pêche et de l’environnement marin, Direction des Affaires Maritimes. https://mer-de-corail.gouv.nc/sites/default/files/atoms/files/matthew_hunter.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  11. Gonzáles Campos JD (2004) Las pretensiones de Marruecos sobre los territorios españoles en el Norte de África (1956-2002). Documento de Trabajo No 15/2004. http://biblioteca.ribei.org/667/1/DT-015-2004-E.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2019
  12. Hall WE (1924) A treatise on international law, 8th edn. Pierce Higgins (ed). Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris D (2010) Cases and materials on international law, 7th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Klabbers J, Lefeber R (1993) Africa: lost between self-determination and uti possidetis. In: Brölmann C, Lefeber R, Zieck M (eds) People and minorities in international law. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 37–76Google Scholar
  15. Macfarlane A, Carney JN, Crawford AJ, Greene GH (1988) A review of the onshore geology. In Greene, GH, Wong, FL (eds) Geology and offshore resources Pacific Island Arcs—Vanuatu region. Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources Earth Science Series, pp 45–91Google Scholar
  16. McCorquodale R (1994) Self-determination: a human rights approach. ICLQ 43(4):857–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCorquodale R, Pangalangan P (2001) Pushing back the limitations of territorial boundaries. EJIL 12(5):867–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McIntyre D (2012) The partition of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands. Island Stud J 7(1):135–146Google Scholar
  19. Milanovic M (2019) ICJ Delivers Chagos Advisory Opinion, UK loses badly. EJIL-Talk, 25 February 2019. https://www.ejiltalk.org/icj-delivers-chagos-advisory-opinion-uk-loses-badly/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  20. Naldi GJ (1987) The Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali): uti possidetis in an African perspective. ICLQ 36(4):893–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. New York Bar Association, Committee on the United Nations (2012) The legal issues involved in the Western Sahara dispute, the principle of self-determination and the legal claims of Morocco. June 2012. https://www2.nycbar.org/pdf/report/uploads/20072264-WesternSaharaDispute–SelfDeterminationMoroccosLegalClaims.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  22. Olson JS (1991) Historical dictionary of European imperialism. Greenwood, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  23. Oraison A (1981) A propos du différend franco-malgache sur les îles éparses du canal de Mozambique. Revue générale de droit international public 85(3):465–513Google Scholar
  24. Prescott JRV (2014) Political frontiers and boundaries. Routledge, Abington-on-ThamesGoogle Scholar
  25. Quane H (1998) The United Nations and the evolving right to self-determination. ICLQ 47(3):537–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raic D (2002) Statehood and the law of self-determination. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  27. Ratner SR (1996) Drawing a better line: uti possidetis and the borders of new states. AJIL 90(4):590–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robin C, Monzier M, Crawford AJ, Eggins SM (1993) The geology, volcanology, petrology-geochemistry and tectonic evolution of the New Hebrides Arc, Vanuatu. Excursion Guide, Australian Department of Primary Industries and Energy and Australian Geological Survey Organisation. https://d28rz98at9flks.cloudfront.net/14655/Rec1993_059.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019
  29. Roth BR (2010) Secessions, coups and the international rule of law: assessing the decline of the effective control doctrine. Melb J Int Law 11:1–48Google Scholar
  30. Schrijver NJ, Prislan V (2015) Cases concerning sovereignty over islands before the International Court of Justice and the Dokdo/Takeshima issue. Ocean Dev Int Law 46(4):281–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2015.1089740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwed A (1982) Territorial claim as a limitation to the right to self-determination in the context of the Falklands Islands dispute. Fordham Int Law J 6(3):443–471Google Scholar
  32. Shaw MN (1986) Title to territory in Africa: international legal issues, 1st edn. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith MAA Jr (1977) Sovereignty over unoccupied territories: the Western Sahara decision. Case Western Reserve J Int Law 9:135–159Google Scholar
  34. Song L, Mosses M (2018) Revisiting ocean boundary disputes in the South Pacific in light of the South China Sea arbitration: a legal perspective. Int Law J Mar Coast Law 33(4):768–798.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-12333079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanley D (1989) South Pacific handbook, 4th edn. Moon, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. Stanley D (2004) Moon handbooks South Pacific, 8th edn. Avalon Travel, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  37. Summers J (2014) Peoples and international law, 2nd revised edn. Brill|Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  38. Sumner BT (2004) Territorial disputes at the International Court of Justice. Duke Law J 53(6):1779–1812Google Scholar
  39. Trinidad J (2012) An evaluation of Morocco’s claims to Spain’s remaining territories in Africa. ICLQ 61(4):961–975.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trinidad J (2018a) Self-determination and territorial integrity in the Chagos Advisory proceedings: potential broader ramifications. QIL Zoom Out 55:61–67Google Scholar
  41. Trinidad J (2018b) Self-determination in disputed colonial territories. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Dyke JM (2009) Disputes over islands and maritime boundaries in East Asia. In: Hong SY, Van Dyke JM (eds) Maritime boundary disputes, settlement processes, and the law of the sea. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 39–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Trease H (1995) Colonial origins of Vanuatu politics. In: Van Trease H (ed) Melanesian politics—stael blong Vanuatu. Institute of Pacific Studies/University of the South Pacific, Fiji, pp 3–58Google Scholar
  44. Wrange P (2019) Self-determination, occupation, and the authority to exploit natural resources: trajectories from four European judgments on Western Sahara. Isr Law Rev 52(1):3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223718000274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lecturer, School of LawUniversity of the South PacificPort VilaVanuatu

Personalised recommendations