The Inquiry-Oriented Instructional Measure
- 76 Downloads
Here we report on the development process of the Inquiry Oriented Instructional Measure (IOIM), an instrument for scoring a lesson along seven inquiry-oriented instructional practices. The development of the IOIM was a multi-phase, iterative process that included reviewing K-16 research literature, analyzing videos of classroom instruction, and pilot testing. This process resulted in the identification of instructional practices that support the successful implementation of inquiry-oriented instruction (IOI) at the undergraduate level. These practices, which comprise the IOIM, provide an empirically grounded description of IOI. In addition, the IOIM provides a rubric for evaluating the degree to which an instructor’s classroom instruction is reflective of these practices. As a proof of concept for the IOIM, we present the results of a pilot test – in which data from a large professional development program designed to support undergraduate mathematics instructors in implementing inquiry-oriented instruction was scored using the IOIM.
KeywordsInquiry-oriented instruction Instructional measure Teaching
This research was supported by NSF award numbers #1431595, #1431641, and #1431393. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Boston, M. D. (2014). Assessing instructional quality in mathematics classrooms through collections of students’ work. In Transforming mathematics instruction (pp. 501–523). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting classroom teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–334). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468.Google Scholar
- Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Güçler, B. (2009). Discipline-based efforts to enhance undergraduate STEM education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2009(117), 55–67.Google Scholar
- Freudenthal H. (1973) Mathematics as an Educational Task, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Gwet, K. L. (2010). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability (Second ed.). Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.Google Scholar
- Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Keene, K., Melhuish, K., Keller, R., & Fortune, N. (in press). Inquiry and inequity in the undergradaute mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
- Larsen, S., Johnson, E., & Weber, K. (Eds.). (2013). The teaching abstract algebra for understanding project: Designing and scaling up a curriculum innovation. Special Issue of the Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 691–790.Google Scholar
- Laursen, S.L. & Rasmussen, C. (2019). More than Meets the I: Inquiry Approaches in Undergraduate Mathematics. Proceedings of the Twenty-second Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Oklahoma City, OK.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665–708).Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 388–420.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, Keene, Dunmyre & Fortune (2017) Inquiry-oriented Differential Equations. https://iode.wordpress.ncsu.edu/. Accessed 04 Arp 2019.
- Rupnow, R., LaCroix, T., & Mullins, B. (2018). Building lasting relationships: Inquiry-oriented instructional measure practices. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 1306–1311). San Diego.Google Scholar
- Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Speer, N. M., & Wagner, J. F. (2009). Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 530–562.Google Scholar
- Wilhelm, A. G., Gillespie Rouse, A., & Jones, F. (2018). Exploring differences in measurement and reporting of classroom observation inter-rater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 23(4).Google Scholar