Learning Mathematics Through Activities with Robots
- 24 Downloads
There are several countries that integrate programming into their mathematics curricula, thereby making robotics an interesting aspect of mathematics education. However, the benefits of using robotics for mathematics education are still unclear. This article addresses the use of mathematical tools with robot-based, problem-solving tasks by discussing how mathematical tools are used in robot-based tasks. This ethnographic intervention study took place in one secondary school in Norway as a part of an elective class in which videotaped data were gathered by observing the activity of groups of two or three students using Lego Mindstorm robots during an eight-week period. Through the use of activity system analysis in Cultural–Historical Activity Theory, we found that students used different kinds of mathematical tools. Furthermore, we found that mathematics can change its role from instrumental tool to object, that is, to an integrated aspect of the purpose of the activity.
KeywordsRobots Mathematics education Cultural–historical activity theory Activity system analysis Mathematical tools Object of activity
- Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
- Ardito, G., Mosley, P., & Scollins, L. (2014). WE, ROBOT: using robotics to promote collaborative and mathematics learning in a middle school classroom. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 73–88.Google Scholar
- Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2015). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding—Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/817341/Computing+our+future_final_2015.pdf). Accessed 15 Dec 2018.Google Scholar
- Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., & Earp, J. (2018). The Nordic approach to introducing computational thinking and programming in compulsory education. Retrieved from https://www.itd.cnr.it/doc/CompuThinkNordic.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar
- Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Karim, M., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review: Can robots reshape K–12 STEM education? Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE international workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts, Lyon, France (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7428217. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
- Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction (pp. 17–40). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Madden, R. (2017). 2nd edn. In Being ethnographic: A guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4–15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Savard, A., & Highfield, K. (2015). Teachers’ talk about robotics: Where is the mathematics? In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia (pp. 540–546). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2013). Læreplan i matematikk fellesfag. Retrieved from http://data.udir.no/kl06/MAT1-04.pdf?lang=http://data.udir.no/kl06/nob. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
- Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2018). Matematikk fellesfag. Retrieved from https://hoering.udir.no/Hoering/v2/286?notatId=573. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.