From Experiences in a Dynamic Environment to Written Narratives on Functions
- 38 Downloads
This study focusses on high school students’ written discourse about their experiences in a dynamic interactive digital environment in which functions were represented in one dimension, as dynagraphs, that are digital artifacts in which the independent variable can be acted upon and its movement causes the variation of the dependent variable. After the introduction of the notion of Dynamic Interactive Mediators within the theory of Commognition, we analyze and classify students’ written productions describing their experience with the dynagraphs. We present this classification as a tool of analysis that allows us to gain insight into how their writing reflects the temporal and dynamic dimensions of their experience with the dynagraphs. This tool is used to analyze 11 excerpts; finally, epistemological, cognitive and didactic implications of this tool are discussed.
KeywordsCovariation Commognition Dynagraph Dynamic interactive mediator Function Narrative
We thank Nathalie Sinclair for her support in developing the activities described in this paper, and for all the fruitful conversations she has engaged in with us, together with David Pimm. This study has been partially supported by Gruppo Nazionale per le Strutture Algebriche, Geometriche e le loro Applicazioni (GNSAGA) of the Italian Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica “Francesco Severi”.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflicts of interest.
- Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. III. CBMS issues in mathematics education (pp. 114–162). Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
- Carlson, M. P. & Oehrtman, M. (2005). Key aspects of knowing and learning the concept of function. Research Sampler 9. MAA Notes.Google Scholar
- Carlson, M. P. Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.Google Scholar
- Colacicco, G., Lisarelli, G., & Antonini, S. (2017). Funzioni e grafici in ambienti digitali dinamici. Didattica della Matematica: dalla ricerca alle pratiche d’aula, 2, 7–25.Google Scholar
- Goldenberg, E. P., Lewis, P., & O’Keefe, J. (1992). Dynamic representation and the development of an understanding of functions. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, 25. MAA Notes.Google Scholar
- Kaput, J. (1992). Patterns in students' formalization of quantitative patterns. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 25. Washington D.C.: MAA.Google Scholar
- Lavie, I., Steiner, A., & Sfard, A. (2018). Routines we live by: From ritual to exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1–24.Google Scholar
- Lisarelli, G. (2017). Exploiting potentials of dynamic representations of functions with parallel axes. In Proceedings of the 13 th international conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 144–150). Lyon: ICTMT.Google Scholar
- Lisarelli, G. (2018). How dragging mediates discourse about functions. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the IGPME (Vol. 3, pp. 323–330). Umeå: PME.Google Scholar
- Lisarelli, G., Antonini, S., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (in press). Capturing ‘time’: Characteristics of students’ written discourse on dynagraphs. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel–Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11 th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Freundenthal Group & Freundenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.Google Scholar
- Monk, S., & Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education. I. CBMS issues in mathematics education (pp. 139–168). Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar