Advertisement

Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: a Clinical Review

  • Emily Stonebrook
  • Monica Hoff
  • John David SpencerEmail author
Pediatric Nephrology (B Dixon and E Nehus, Section Editors)
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Pediatric Nephrology

Abstract

Purpose of review

This review highlights the most common congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) that are encountered in pediatric practices. CAKUT are the most common cause of prenatally diagnosed developmental malformations and encompass a spectrum of disorders impacting lower urinary tract development as well as kidney development and function. In pediatric and adolescent populations, developmental abnormalities are the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease. The goal of this review is to provide pediatric providers a framework for appropriate clinical management as well as highlight when referral to subspecialty care is needed.

Recent findings

While the exact etiologies of CAKUT are not completely defined, new evidence demonstrates that genetic and molecular changes impact embryonic kidney and urinary tract development. As a result, phenotypes and clinical outcomes may be affected.

Summary

Because pediatric providers provide frontline care to children and adolescents with developmental kidney and urinary tract anomalies, updated knowledge of CAKUT pathogenesis, embryology, clinical management, and patient outcomes is needed. This manuscript reviews CAKUT etiologies and essential diagnostic, prognostic, and management strategies.

Keywords

Nephrology Urology Congenital kidney anomalies Pediatrics Genetics Embryology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ms. Lisa Feurer for assistance for the artwork shown in Fig. 1.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Emily Stonebrook declares that she has no conflict of interest. Monica Hoff declares that she has no conflict of interest. John David Spencer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Piscione TD, Rosenblum ND. The malformed kidney: disruption of glomerular and tubular development. Clin Genet. 1999;56(5):341–56.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith JM, Stablein DM, Munoz R, Hebert D, McDonald RA. Contributions of the transplant registry: the 2006 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS). Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11(4):366–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00704.x.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, Schlaefer K, Spranger J. Malformations in newborn: results based on 30,940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990-1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;266(3):163–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seikaly MG, Ho PL, Emmett L, Fine RN, Tejani A. Chronic renal insufficiency in children: the 2001 annual report of the NAPRTCS. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(8):796–804.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1158-5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamatani N, Moritani M, Yamanaka H, Takeuchi F, Hosoya T, Itakura M. Localization of a gene for familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy causing underexcretion-type gout to 16p12 by genome-wide linkage analysis of a large family. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(4):925–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200004)43:4<925::AID-ANR26>3.0.CO;2-B.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolf MT, Mucha BE, Attanasio M, Zalewski I, Karle SM, Neumann HP, et al. Mutations of the uromodulin gene in MCKD type 2 patients cluster in exon 4, which encodes three EGF-like domains. Kidney Int. 2003;64(5):1580–7.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00269.x.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otto EA, Loeys B, Khanna H, Hellemans J, Sudbrak R, Fan S, et al. Nephrocystin-5, a ciliary IQ domain protein, is mutated in senior-Loken syndrome and interacts with RPGR and calmodulin. Nat Genet. 2005;37(3):282–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1520.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torres VE. Therapies to slow polycystic kidney disease. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2004;98(1):e1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000079926.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bilous RW, Murty G, Parkinson DB, Thakker RV, Coulthard MG, Burn J, et al. Brief report: autosomal dominant familial hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness, and renal dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(15):1069–74.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199210083271506.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT, de Roux N, Dode C, Dunkel L, et al. Expert consensus document: European consensus statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism--pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(9):547–64.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.112.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mollet G, Silbermann F, Delous M, Salomon R, Antignac C, Saunier S. Characterization of the nephrocystin/nephrocystin-4 complex and subcellular localization of nephrocystin-4 to primary cilia and centrosomes. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(5):645–56.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi061.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellanne-Chantelot C, Chauveau D, Gautier JF, Dubois-Laforgue D, Clauin S, Beaufils S, et al. Clinical spectrum associated with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta mutations. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):510–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jira PE, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ, Smeitink JA, Sengers RC, Wevers RA. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome and the DHCR7 gene. Ann Hum Genet. 2003;67(Pt 3):269–80.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crane DI, Maxwell MA, Paton BC. PEX1 mutations in the Zellweger spectrum of the peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Hum Mutat. 2005;26(3):167–75.  https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20211.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geary DA, Schaefer F. Comprehensive pediatric nephrology. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    •• Sanna-Cherchi S, Westland R, Ghiggeri GM, Gharavi AG. Genetic basis of human congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(1):4–15.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI95300 This review highlights how common genetic variants impact CAKUT development, prognosis, and clinical care.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toka HR, Toka O, Hariri A, Nguyen HT. Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30(4):374–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.06.004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    •• Calderon-Margalit R, Skorecki K, Vivante A. History of childhood kidney disease and risk of adult end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(18):1751–2.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1802894 This study shows that a history of clinically evident kidney disease in childhood, including acute kidney injury and structural anomalies, significantly increases end-stage kidney disease risk and has long-term consequences.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fletcher J, McDonald S, Alexander SI, Australian and New Zealand Pediatric Nephrology A. Prevalence of genetic renal disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28(2):251–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2306-6.
  20. 20.
    Weber S, Moriniere V, Knuppel T, Charbit M, Dusek J, Ghiggeri GM, et al. Prevalence of mutations in renal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: results of the ESCAPE study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(10):2864–70.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006030277.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weber S. Novel genetic aspects of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24(2):212–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834fdbd4.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harshman LA, Zepeda-Orozco D. Genetic considerations in pediatric chronic kidney disease. J Pediatr Genet. 2016;5(1):43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1557111.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Capone VP, Morello W, Taroni F, Montini G. Genetics of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: the current state of play. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040796.
  24. 24.
    Vivante A, Kohl S, Hwang DY, Dworschak GC, Hildebrandt F. Single-gene causes of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in humans. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(4):695–704.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2684-4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    dos Santos Junior AC, de Miranda DM, Simoes e Silva AC. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: an embryogenetic review. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2014;102(4):374–381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.21084.
  26. 26.
    Blake J, Rosenblum ND. Renal branching morphogenesis: morphogenetic and signaling mechanisms. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;36:2–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.011.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seely JC. A brief review of kidney development, maturation, developmental abnormalities, and drug toxicity: juvenile animal relevancy. J Toxicol Pathol. 2017;30(2):125–33.  https://doi.org/10.1293/tox.2017-0006.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takeuchi H, Koyanagi T, Yoshizato T, Takashima T, Satoh S, Nakano H. Fetal urine production at different gestational ages: correlation to various compromised fetuses in utero. Early Hum Dev. 1994;40(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Westland R, Schreuder MF. Gender differences in solitary functioning kidney: do they affect renal outcome? Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(11):2243–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2473-0.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Urisarri A, Gil M, Mandia N, Aldamiz-Echevarria L, Iria R, Gonzalez-Lamuno D, et al. Retrospective study to identify risk factors for chronic kidney disease in children with congenital solitary functioning kidney detected by neonatal renal ultrasound screening. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(32):e11819.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011819.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chow JS, Benson CB, Lebowitz RL. The clinical significance of an empty renal fossa on prenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(8):1049–54 quiz 55-7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P. Pediatric nephrology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sagi-Dain L, Maya I, Peleg A, Reches A, Banne E, Baris HN, et al. Microarray analysis in pregnancies with isolated unilateral kidney agenesis. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(4):825–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2018.3.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Westland R, Schreuder MF, van Goudoever JB, Sanna-Cherchi S, van Wijk JA. Clinical implications of the solitary functioning kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(5):978–86.  https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.08900813.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kovesdy CP, Furth SL, Zoccali C, World Kidney Day Steering C. Obesity and kidney disease: hidden consequences of the epidemic. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;4:2054358117698669.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358117698669.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gonzalez E, Gutierrez E, Morales E, Hernandez E, Andres A, Bello I, et al. Factors influencing the progression of renal damage in patients with unilateral renal agenesis and remnant kidney. Kidney Int. 2005;68(1):263–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00401.x.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grinsell MM, Butz K, Gurka MJ, Gurka KK, Norwood V. Sport-related kidney injury among high school athletes. Pediatrics. 2012;130(1):e40–5.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2082.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    N’Guessen G, Stephens FD, Pick J. Congenital superior ectopic (thoracic) kidney. Urology. 1984;24(3):219–28.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guarino N, Tadini B, Camardi P, Silvestro L, Lace R, Bianchi M. The incidence of associated urological abnormalities in children with renal ectopia. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 2):1757–9 discussion 9.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    van den Bosch CM, van Wijk JA, Beckers GM, van der Horst HJ, Schreuder MF, Bokenkamp A. Urological and nephrological findings of renal ectopia. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1574–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.041.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tkocz M, Kupajski M. Tumour in horseshoe kidney - different surgical treatment shown in five example cases. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2012;16(3):254–7.  https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2012.29295.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Petrovic M, Andrejevic V, Djurasic L, Stamenkovic V, Acimovic M, Pejcic T, et al. Tumors of the horseshoe kidney--characteristics and literature review. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2012;59(1):53–5.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yecies T, Turner Li RM, Ferroni MC, Jacobs BL, Davies BJ. Partial and hemi-nephrectomy for renal malignancy in patients with horseshoe kidney. Can J Urol. 2016;23(1):8156–9.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    • Shin YB, Park JH. Recent trends in ADPKD research. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;933:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2041-4_1 This review highlights newly identified molecular mechanisms and pathological pathways that impact autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression and how they may be developed to slow disease progression.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malekshahabi T, Khoshdel Rad N, Serra AL, Moghadasali R. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: disrupted pathways and potential therapeutic interventions. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:12451–70.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28094.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Churchill DN, Bear JC, Morgan J, Payne RH, McManamon PJ, Gault MH. Prognosis of adult onset polycystic kidney disease re-evaluated. Kidney Int. 1984;26(2):190–3.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chapman AB. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: time for a change? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(5):1399–407.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2007020155.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tangri N, Hougen I, Alam A, Perrone R, McFarlane P, Pei Y. Total kidney volume as a biomarker of disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;4:2054358117693355.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358117693355.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Subramanian S, Ahmad T. Polycystic kidney disease of childhood. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2018.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Halvorson CR, Bremmer MS, Jacobs SC. Polycystic kidney disease: inheritance, pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2010;3:69–83.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Torra R. Recent advances in the clinical management of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. F1000Res. 2019;8.  https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17109.1.
  52. 52.
    Feldenberg LR, Siegel NJ. Clinical course and outcome for children with multicystic dysplastic kidneys. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2000;14(12):1098–101.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rudnik-Schoneborn S, John U, Deget F, Ehrich JH, Misselwitz J, Zerres K. Clinical features of unilateral multicystic renal dysplasia in children. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157(8):666–72.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mackie GG, Stephens FD. Duplex kidneys: a correlation of renal dysplasia with position of the ureteral orifice. J Urol. 1975;114(2):274–80.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Murer L, Benetti E, Artifoni L. Embryology and genetics of primary vesico-ureteric reflux and associated renal dysplasia. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(6):788–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0390-1.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rahman RC, Amoreo O. Multicystic dysplastic kidney: diagnosis and evolution. Pediatr Nephrol(Berlin, Germany). 2005;20(7):1023.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-005-1865-1.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    John U, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Zerres K, Misselwitz J. Kidney growth and renal function in unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol(Berlin, Germany). 1998;12(7):567–71.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Merrot T, Lumenta DB, Tercier S, Morisson-Lacombes G, Guys JM, Alessandrini P. Multicystic dysplastic kidney with ipsilateral abnormalities of genitourinary tract: experience in children. Urology. 2006;67(3):603–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.062.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Woodward M, Frank D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int. 2002;89(2):149–56.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hains DS, Bates CM, Ingraham S, Schwaderer AL. Management and etiology of the unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: a review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(2):233–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-008-0828-8.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Aslam M, Watson AR. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: long term outcomes. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(10):820–3.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.095786.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Narchi H. Risk of hypertension with multicystic kidney disease: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(9):921–4.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.075333.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Homsy YL, Anderson JH, Oudjhane K, Russo P. Wilms tumor and multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. J Urol. 1997;158(6):2256–9 discussion 9-60.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P, Yoshikawa N, Emma F, Goldstein SL. Pediatric nephrology. 2016.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    • Arlen AM, Cooper CS. New trends in voiding cystourethrography and vesicoureteral reflux: who, when and how? Int J Urol. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13915 This manuscript reviews the clinical diagnosis, management, and treatment strategies for vesicoureteral reflux.
  66. 66.
    Sinha SK, Agarwal A. Current perspectives in management of vesicoureteral reflux. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55(12):1039–40.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    McKenna PH, Herndon CD. Voiding dysfunction associated with incontinence, vesicoureteral reflux and recurrent urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Urol. 2000;10(6):599–606.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Spencer JD, Schwaderer A, McHugh K, Vanderbrink B, Becknell B, Hains DS. The demographics and costs of inpatient vesicoureteral reflux management in the USA. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:1995–2001.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-1900-3.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tokhmafshan F, Brophy PD, Gbadegesin RA, Gupta IR. Vesicoureteral reflux and the extracellular matrix connection. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32(4):565–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3386-5.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Shakya R, Watanabe T, Costantini F. The role of GDNF/Ret signaling in ureteric bud cell fate and branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2005;8(1):65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.008.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Olbing H, Tamminen-Mobius T. International reflux study in children. Contrib Nephrol. 1988;61:228–35.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rosenberg HK, Ilaslan H, Finkelstein MS. Work-up of urinary tract infection in infants and children. Ultrasound Q. 2001;17(2):87–102.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    • Subcommittee On Urinary Tract I. Reaffirmation of AAP clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis and management of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children 2–24 months of age. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6).  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3026 In this manuscript, the American Academy of Pediatrics updates its guidelines for the management of urinary tract infections in febrile infants.
  74. 74.
    Szlyk GR, Williams SB, Majd M, Belman AB, Rushton HG. Incidence of new renal parenchymal inflammatory changes following breakthrough urinary tract infection in patients with vesicoureteral reflux treated with antibiotic prophylaxis: evaluation by 99MTechnetium dimercapto-succinic acid renal scan. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Pt 2):1566–8; discussion 8-9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000085962.68246.ce.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hutch JA. Theory of maturation of the intravesical ureter. J Urol. 1961;86:534–8.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Silva JM, Diniz JS, Lima EM, Vergara RM, Oliveira EA. Predictive factors of resolution of primary vesico-ureteric reflux: a multivariate analysis. BJU Int. 2006;97(5):1063–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06064.x.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Smellie JM, Jodal U, Lax H, Mobius TT, Hirche H, Olbing H, et al. Outcome at 10 years of severe vesicoureteric reflux managed medically: report of the international reflux study in children. J Pediatr. 2001;139(5):656–63.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.117583.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Spencer JD, Schwaderer AL, Becknell B, Watson J, Hains DS. The innate immune response during urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(7):1139–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2513-9.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Becknell B, Schwaderer A, Hains DS, Spencer JD. Amplifying renal immunity: the role of antimicrobial peptides in pyelonephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(11):642–55.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.105.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Becknell B, Schober M, Korbel L, Spencer JD. The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of acute and recurrent pediatric urinary tract infections. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2015;13(1):81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2015.986097.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bahat H, Ben-Ari M, Ziv-Baran T, Neheman A, Youngster I, Goldman M. Predictors of grade 3-5 vesicoureteral reflux in infants </= 2 months of age with pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4167-0.
  82. 82.
    Garin EH, Olavarria F, Garcia Nieto V, Valenciano B, Campos A, Young L. Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):626–32.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Garin EH, Campos A, Homsy Y. Primary vesicoureteral reflux: review of current concepts. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;12(3):249–56.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Roberts JA. Etiology and pathophysiology of pyelonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Korbel L, Howell M, Spencer JD. The clinical diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections in children and adolescents. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017;37(4):273–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2017.1382046.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Garin EH. Primary vesicoureteral reflux; what have we learnt from the recently published randomized, controlled trials? Pediatr Nephrol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4045-9.
  87. 87.
    Rodriguez MM. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014;33(5–6):293–320.  https://doi.org/10.3109/15513815.2014.959678.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily Stonebrook
    • 1
    • 2
  • Monica Hoff
    • 3
  • John David Spencer
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Pediatric Nephrology Fellowship Program, Division of Pediatric NephrologyNationwide Children’s HospitalColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pediatric NephrologyNationwide Children’s HospitalColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Pediatrics Residency Program, Department of PediatricsNationwide Children’s HospitalColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations