Advertisement

An Empirical Study on the Application of the Burden of Normality to Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease

  • Marc BaertschiEmail author
  • Nicolas Favez
  • Michalina Radomska
  • François Herrmann
  • Pierre R. Burkhard
  • Kerstin Weber
  • Alessandra Canuto
  • João Flores Alves Dos Santos
Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Psychosocial maladjustment frequently occurs following deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). This paper aimed at investigating, for the first time with first-hand data, whether the burden of normality model (BoN) could adequately describe the manifestations and underlying dynamics of psychosocial maladjustment after DBS for PD. In a mixed experimental design including quantitative and qualitative data, 19 patients treated with DBS for PD were interviewed on their post-DBS lived experience with the Austin CEP Interview, a semi-structured instrument addressing all elements of the BoN. In addition, health-related quality of life was measured before surgery and at the time of interview with the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. All patients experienced clinical manifestations of psychosocial maladjustment as described in the BoN. Yet, there was a great interindividual heterogeneity in descriptions of the perceived course of the post-DBS life. Experiencing various types of symptoms was nevertheless associated with the perception of a less satisfying life after surgery. In addition, most patients had realistic expectations on the surgical outcome, and those with unrealistic or mixed expectations did not differ from other patients in terms of psychosocial maladjustment. The BoN accurately conceptualizes psychosocial maladjustment experienced by DBS patients with PD. However, no relationship was established between the nature of pre-operative expectations and BoN symptoms.

Keywords

Burden of normality Deep brain stimulation Expectations Parkinson’s disease Rehabilitation Consultation-liaison psychiatry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Number: CR31I3_149578/1). The authors are thankful to Prof. Sarah Wilson and her colleagues from the University of Melbourne for allowing us to use the Austin CEP Interview.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, van Middendorp H. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):246–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bladin PF. Psychosocial difficulties and outcome after temporal lobectomy. Epilepsia. 1992;33(5):898–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson SJ, Saling MM, Kincade P, Bladin PF. Patient expectations of temporal lobe surgery. Epilepsia. 1998;39(2):167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson SJ, Saling MM, Lawrence J, Bladin PF. Outcome of temporal lobectomy: expectations and the prediction of perceived success. Epilepsy Res. 1999;36(1):1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wrench J, Wilson SJ, Bladin PF. Mood disturbance before and after seizure surgery: a comparison of temporal and extratemporal resections. Epilepsia. 2004;45(5):534–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson SJ, Frazer DW, Lawrence JA, Bladin PF. Psychosocial adjustment following relief of chronic narcolepsy. Sleep Med. 2007;8(3):252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genardini N, Wilson SJ, Lawrence JA, Hare DL. Patterns of psychosocial adjustment following cardiac surgery. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agid Y, Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, Mallet L, Houeto JL, Behar C, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: The doctor is happy, the patient less so? J Neural Transm. 2006;70:409–14.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schüpbach WMM, Gargiulo M, Welter ML, Mallet L, Béhar C, Houeto JL, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology. 2006;66:1811–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perozzo P, Rizzone M, Bergamasco B, Castelli L, Lanotte M, Tavella A, et al. Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus: behavioural modifications and familiar relations. Neurol Sci. 2001;22(1):81–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pollak P (2013) Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease—patient selection. 1st ed, Vol. 116. Handbook of clinical neurology. Elsevier, pp 97–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00009-7.
  12. 12.
    Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, Pérez-Ramos J, Serrano-Pérez P, Panetta J, Hilarion P (2014) Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24487826.
  13. 13.
    Houeto J-L, Mallet L, Mesnage V, du Montcel ST, Béhar C, Gargiulo M, et al. Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: behavior and social adaptation. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1090–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Houeto J-L, Mesnage V, Mallet L, Pillon B, Gargiulo M, du Moncel ST, et al. Behavioural disorders, Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(6):701–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer M, Montel SR, Colnat-Coulbois S, Lerond J, Potheegadoo J, Vidailhet P, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: social adjustment, quality of life and coping strategies. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8(30):2856–67.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Funkiewiez A, Ardouin C, Caputo E, Krack P, Fraix V, Klinger H, et al. Long term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on cognitive function, mood, and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(6):834–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets FJGG, Berney A, Bogousslavsky J, Villemure J-G, Ghika J. Suicide after successful deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurology. 2004;63(11):2170–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vesper J, Haak S, Ostertag C, Nikkhah G. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in elderly patients–analysis of outcome and complications. BMC Neurol. 2007;7:7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fluchere F, Witjas T, Eusebio A, Bruder N, Giorgi R, Leveque M, et al. Controlled general anaesthesia for subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(10):1167–73.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. The “burden of normality”: concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(5):649–56.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.5.649.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gilbert F. The burden of normality: from “chronically ill” to “symptom free”. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(7):408–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bell E, Maxwell B, McAndrews MP, Sadikot AF, Racine E. A review of social and relational aspects of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease informed by healthcare provider experiences. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2011:871–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dos Santos JFA, du Montcel ST, Gargiulo M, Behar C, Montel S, Hergueta T, et al. Tackling psychosocial maladjustment in Parkinson’s disease patients following subthalamic deep-brain stimulation: a randomised clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0174512.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baertschi M, Dos Santos JFA, Burkhard P, Weber K, Canuto A, Favez N. The burden of normality as a model of psychosocial adjustment after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic investigation. Neuropsychology. 2019;33(2):178–94.  https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. Paradoxical results in the cure of chronic illness: the “burden of normality” as exemplified following seizure surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2004;5(1):13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. The burden of normality: a framework for rehabilitation after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2007;48(Suppl 9):13–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM, Pattison PE. Characterizing psychosocial outcome trajectories following seizure surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;6(4):570–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kemp S, Garlovsky J, Reynders H, Caswell H, Baker G, Shah E. Predicting the psychosocial outcome of epilepsy surgery: a longitudinal perspective on the ‘burden of normality. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;60:149–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.04.029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haahr A, Kirkevold M, Hall EOC, Østergaard K. From miracle to reconciliation: a hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experience of living with Parkinson’s disease following deep brain stimulation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(10):1228–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mattis S. Dementia rating scale professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-ltem short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McKim CA. The value of mixed methods research: a mixed methods study. J Mix Methods Res. 2017;11(2):202–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schermer M. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kraemer F. Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(12):757–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gilbert F, Viaña JNM, Ineichen C. Deflating the “DBS causes personality changes” bubble. Neuroethics. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim YE, Kim HJ, Kim H-J, Lee J-Y, Yun JY, Kim J-Y, et al. Impulse control and related behaviors after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(7):964–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lhommée E, Klinger H, Thobois S, Schmitt E, Ardouin C, Bichon A, et al. Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: restoring the balance of motivated behaviours. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 5):1463–77.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eusebio A, Witjas T, Cohen J, Fluchère F, Jouve E, Régis J, et al. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and compulsive use of dopaminergic medication in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(8):868–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amami P, Dekker I, Piacentini S, Ferré F, Romito LM, Franzini A, et al. Impulse control behaviours in patients with Parkinson’s disease after subthalamic deep brain stimulation: de novo cases and 3-year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;86:562–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Xie A. Apathy following bilateral deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2018;2018:1–7.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lamberti VMJ, Pereira B, Lhommée E, Bichon A, Schmitt E, Pelissier P, et al. Profile of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: surgical candidates compared to controls. J Parkinsons Dis. 2016;6(1):133–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gisquet E. Cerebral implants and Parkinson’s disease: a unique form of biographical disruption? Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hariz G-M, Hamberg K. Perceptions of living with a device-based treatment: an account of patients treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(3):272–7 discussion 277–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sherif C, Dorfer C, Kalteis K, Thun C, Kaiser I, Gibson D, et al. Deep brain pulse-generator and lead-extensions: subjective sensations related to measured parameters. Mov Disord. 2008;23(7):1036–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hasegawa H, Samuel M, Douiri A, Ashkan K. Patients’ expectations in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson disease. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6):1295–1295.e2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maier F, Lewis CJ, Horstkoetter N, Eggers C, Kalbe E, Maarouf M, et al. Patients’ expectations of deep brain stimulation, and subjective perceived outcome related to clinical measures in Parkinson’s disease: a mixed-method approach. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(11):1273–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gilbert F, Goddard E, Viaña JNM, Carter A, Horne M. I Miss being me: phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8(2):96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Llebaria G, Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, García-Sánchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A, et al. Cut-off score of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale for screening dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(11):1546–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Baertschi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nicolas Favez
    • 2
  • Michalina Radomska
    • 2
  • François Herrmann
    • 3
  • Pierre R. Burkhard
    • 4
    • 6
  • Kerstin Weber
    • 5
  • Alessandra Canuto
    • 6
  • João Flores Alves Dos Santos
    • 7
  1. 1.Service of General Psychiatry and PsychotherapyNant FoundationMontreuxSwitzerland
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Division of GeriatricsGeneva University HospitalsThônexSwitzerland
  4. 4.Service of NeurologyGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
  5. 5.Division of Institutional Measures, Medical DirectionGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
  6. 6.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  7. 7.Service of Liaison Psychiatry and Crisis InterventionGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations