Advertisement

An Investigation on Mechanical and Wear Characteristics of Al 6063/TiC Metal Matrix Composites Using RSM

  • P. Venkateshwar ReddyEmail author
  • P. Rajendra Prasad
  • D. Mohana Krishnudu
  • E. Venugopal Goud
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on the consequences of reinforcement content (TiC particles) on sliding wear behavior of aluminum alloy Al 6063 fabricated by stir casting process. Three different reinforcement percentages (5, 10 and 15) have been considered in the present study. Both hardness and tensile tests have been executed on the fabricated samples. The results of the conducted mechanical tests showed that the increase in reinforcement weight percent increased the tensile strength and hardness. Pin-on-disk tests have been performed on the fabricated composite samples to identify their tribological behavior. Reinforcement weight percent, load and sliding speed with three levels each were taken as the process variables, and specific wear rate is considered as response. Box–Behnken design have been utilized to carry out the experiments and to analyze the results. Moreover, ANOVA is carried out to know the influencing parameter on the response. From ANOVA, it was confirmed that reinforcement weight percent and sliding speed is considered as the influencing parameters on the response.

Keywords

Composites Pin-on-disk Aluminum alloy Wear RSM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would sincerely like to thank the management of G. Pulla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Kurnool, for providing the testing facilities and their constant support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramaswamy A, Perumal AV, Chelladurai SJS (2019) Investigation on mechanical properties and dry sliding wear characterization of stir cast LM13 aluminium alloy-ZrB2-TiC particulate hybrid composites. Mater Res Express 6(6):066578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    David Raja Selvam J, Dinaharan I, Rai RS, Mashinini PM (2019) Dry sliding wear behaviour of in situ fabricated TiC particulate reinforced AA6061 aluminium alloy. Tribol Mater Surf Interfaces 13(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirvanimoghaddam K, Khayyam H, Abdizadeh H, Akbari MK, Pakseresht AH, Abdi F et al (2016) Effect of B4C, TiB2 and ZrSiO4 ceramic particles on mechanical properties of aluminium matrix composites: experimental investigation and predictive modelling. Ceram Int 42(5):6206–6220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radhika N, Raghu R (2015) Dry sliding wear behaviour of aluminium Al–Si12Cu/TiB2 metal matrix composite using response surface methodology. Tribol Lett 59(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poria S, Sahoo P, Sutradhar G (2016) Tribological characterization of stir-cast aluminium-TiB2 metal matrix composites. Silicon 8(4):591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bains PS, Sidhu SS, Payal HS (2016) Fabrication and machining of metal matrix composites: a review. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suresh S (2013) Fundamentals of metal-matrix composites. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Surappa MK (2003) Aluminium matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 28(1–2):319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ünlü BS (2008) Investigation of tribological and mechanical properties Al2O3–SiC reinforced Al composites manufactured by casting or P/M method. Mater Des 29(10):2002–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akbari MK, Baharvandi HR, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2015) Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater Des 1980–2015(66):150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li M, Ma K, Jiang L, Yang H, Lavernia EJ, Zhang L, Schoenung JM (2016) Synthesis and mechanical behavior of nanostructured Al 5083/n-TiB2 metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 656:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma BP, Rao GS, Vates UK (2019) Powder metallurgy processing and mechanical characterization of iron-based composite reinforced with alumina and zirconium diboride. In: Shanker K, Shankar R, Sindhwani R (eds) Advances in industrial and production engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 303–308Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tjong SC (2007) Novel nanoparticle-reinforced metal matrix composites with enhanced mechanical properties. Adv Eng Mater 9(8):639–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akhtar F, Askari SJ, Shah KA, Du X, Guo S (2009) Microstructure, mechanical properties, electrical conductivity and wear behavior of high volume TiC reinforced Cu-matrix composites. Mater Charact 60(4):327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajkumar K, Aravindan S (2011) Tribological performance of microwave sintered copper–TiC–graphite hybrid composites. Tribol Int 44(4):347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Mukund K, Ashwin M, Prabu M (2006) Dry sliding wear behavior of Al 2219/SiCp-Gr hybrid metal matrix composites. J Mater Eng Perform 15(6):668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baskaran S, Anandakrishnan V, Duraiselvam M (2014) Investigations on dry sliding wear behavior of in situ casted AA7075–TiC metal matrix composites by using Taguchi technique. Mater Des 60:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    El-Aziz KA, Saber D, Sallam HEDM (2015) Wear and corrosion behavior of Al–Si matrix composite reinforced with alumina. J Bio Tribo Corros 1(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vinod B, Ramanathan S, Anandajothi M (2018) Effect of organic and inorganic reinforcement on tribological behaviour of aluminium A356 matrix hybrid composite. J Bio Tribo Corros 4(3):45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tyagi R (2005) Synthesis and tribological characterization of in situ cast Al–TiC composites. Wear 259(1–6):569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kostornov AG, Fushchich OI, Chevychelova TM, Varchenko VT, Kostenko AD (2013) Prospects of improving the tribotechnical characteristics of titanium composites. Powder Metall Met Ceram 51(11–12):687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Selvakumar N, Narayanasamy P (2016) Optimization and effect of weight fraction of MoS2 on the tribological behavior of Mg-TiC-MoS2 hybrid composites. Tribol Trans 59(4):733–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    León-Patiño CA, Braulio-Sánchez M, Aguilar-Reyes EA, Bedolla-Becerril E, Bedolla-Jacuinde A (2019) Dry sliding wear behavior of infiltrated particulate reinforced Ni/TiC composites. Wear 426:989–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Narayanasamy P, Selvakumar N, Balasundar P (2018) Effect of weight percentage of TiC on their tribological properties of magnesium composites. Mater Today 5:6570–6578Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jha P, Gautam RK, Tyagi R (2017) Friction and wear behavior of Cu–4 wt% Ni–TiC composites under dry sliding conditions. Friction 5(4):437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumar GV, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N, Bhagyashekar MS (2010) Studies on Al6061-SiC and Al7075-Al2O3 metal matrix composites. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 9(01):43Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdizadeh H, Baghchesara MA (2013) Investigation on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of A356 aluminum alloy based ZrO2 particle reinforced metal-matrix composites. Ceram Int 39(2):2045–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suresh S, Moorthi N, Prema CE (2014) Tribological and mechanical behavior study of Al6061-TiB2 metal matrix composites using stir casting. In: Diaz PM, Palanikumar K, Ravi Kumar P (eds) Advanced Materials Research. vols 984–5, pp 200–206Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Standard ASTM (2013) ASTM E8/E8M-13a. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferreira SC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandao GC et al (2007) Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta 597(2):179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Astm ASTM (2010) G99: standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on-disk apparatus. ASTM Stand G99:1–5Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Canakci A, Arslan F (2012) Abrasive wear behaviour of B 4 C particle reinforced Al2024 MMCs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(5–8):785–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sajjadi SA, Ezatpour HR, Parizi MT (2012) Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and compo-casting processes. Mater Des 34:106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mazahery A, Ostadshabani M (2011) Investigation on mechanical properties of nano-Al2O3-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Compos Mater 45(24):2579–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vinod B, Ramanathan S, Anandajothi M (2018) Effect of organic and inorganic reinforcement on tribological behaviour of aluminium A356 matrix hybrid composite. J Bio Tribo Corros 4(3):45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2012) Study on microstructure and abrasive wear behavior of sintered Al matrix composites. Ceram Int 38(5):4263–4269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Suresh S, Gowd GH, Kumar MD (2019) Mechanical and wear characterization of Al/nano-SiC NMMCs by liquid state process. J Bio Tribo Corros 5(2):43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ghorpade SS, Gawande SH, Patil AA (2018) Tribological behaviors of steel and Al alloys for hydroforming components. J Bio Tribo Corros 4(3):49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reddy PV, Reddy BV, Rao PS (2018) A numerical study on tube hydroforming process to optimize the process parameters by Taguchi method. Mater Today 5(11):25376–25381Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJNT University (GPREC Research Centre)AnanthapuramuIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringG Pulla Reddy Enginering College (Autonomous)KurnoolIndia

Personalised recommendations