Advertisement

Effects of Food Restriction and Pre-Training Length on Delay Discounting in Male Wistar Rats

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

Impulsivity is often measured using delay discounting, a task in which individuals must select between smaller, sooner and larger, later reinforcers. The magnitude effect is the tendency for individuals to discount larger delayed reinforcers less steeply than smaller ones. In terms of food restriction, the magnitude effect predicts that restricted subjects should behave less impulsively, because restriction may increase food reinforcer value and therefore increase subjects’ propensity to select larger, later reinforcers. However, previous research examining the effects of reinforcer restriction has not demonstrated this. In the present research, 12 male Wistar rats were exposed to a delay discounting procedure under both free-feeding and food restriction conditions. Subjects selected more larger, later reinforcers when restricted to ~85% of their free-feeding weights, which is consistent with the magnitude effect. In addition, we systematically examined the effects of shortening the second training phase of a common delay discounting procedure (i.e., Evenden & Ryan, 1996, 1999), during which responses produced the immediate delivery of either one or five reinforcers. The number of sessions in the second training phase did not affect discounting once delays were imposed, indicating that future researchers may shorten this training phase without affecting impulsive responding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Adams, C. D. (1982). Variations in the sensitivity of instrumental responding to reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 34B(2), 77–98.

  2. Adriani, W., Boyer, F., Gioiosa, L., Macri, S., Dreyer, J. L., & Laviola, G. (2009). Increased impulsive behavior and risk proneness following lentivirus-mediated dopamine transporter over-expression in rats’ nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience, 159(1), 47–58.

  3. Adriani, W., Rea, M., Baviera, M., Invernizzi, W., Carli, M., Ghirardi, O., et al. (2004). Acetyl-l-carnitine reduces impulsive behaviour in adolescent rats. Psychopharmacology, 176(3–4), 296–304.

  4. Adriani, W., Seta, D. D., Dessi-Fulgheri, F., Farabollini, F., & Laviola, G. (2003). Altered profiles of spontaneous novelty seeking, impulsive behavior, and response to D-amphetamine in rats perinatally exposed to bisphenol A. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(4), 395–401.

  5. Bailey, C., Peterson, J. R., Schnegelsiepen, A., Stuebing, S. L., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2018). Durability and generalizability of time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice in rats. Behavioural Processes, 152, 54–62.

  6. Borges, A. M., Kuang, J., Milhorn, H., & Yi, R. (2016). An alternative approach to calculating area-under-the-curve (AUC) in delay discounting research. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106(2), 145–155.

  7. Evenden, J. L., & Ryan, C. N. (1996). The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: The effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 128(2), 161–170.

  8. Evenden, J. L., & Ryan, C. N. (1999). The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VI: The effects of ethanol and selective serotonergic drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 413–421.

  9. Grace, R. C., Sargisson, R. J., & White, K. G. (2012). Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 102–108.

  10. Griffin, S. A., Lynam, D. R., & Samuel, D. B. (2017). Dimensional conceptualizations of impulsivity. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, & Treatment, 17, 1–13.

  11. Hernandez, C. M., Vetere, L. M., Orsini, C. A., McQuail, J. A., Maurer, A. P., Burke, S. N., et al. (2017). Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 x brown Norway hybrid rats. Neurobiology of Aging, 60, 141–152.

  12. Holland, P. C. (2004). Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30(2), 104–117.

  13. Hollander, E., & Rosen, J. (2000). Impulsivity. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 14(2), S39–S44.

  14. Huskinson, S. L., Krebs, C. A., & Anderson, K. G. (2012). Strain differences in delay discounting between Lewis and Fischer 344 rats at baseline and following acute and chronic administration of d-amphetamine. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 101(3), 403–416.

  15. Krebs, C. A., Reilly, W. J., & Anderson, K. G. (2016). Reinforcer magnitude affects delay discounting and influences effects of d-amphetamine in rats. Behavioural Processes, 130, 39–45.

  16. Levesque, R. J. R. (2011). Impulsivity. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 1399–1401). New York, NY: Springer.

  17. Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 191–206.

  18. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2), 235–243.

  19. Nettle, D. (2017). Does hunger contribute to socioeconomic gradients in behavior? Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Article ID, 358.

  20. Odum, A. L. (2011a). Delay discounting: I’m a K, you’re a K. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 427–439.

  21. Odum, A. L. (2011b). Delay discounting: Trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87(1), 1–9.

  22. Oliveira, L., Calvert, A. L., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2013). Level of deprivation does not affect degree of discounting in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 41(2), 148–158.

  23. Orquin, J. L., & Kurzban, R. (2016). A meta-analysis of blood glucose effects on human decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 546–567.

  24. Ostaszewski, P., Karzel, K., & Szafranska, P. (2003). Changes in discounting rates as adaptation to food deprivation in rats: The role of age and deprivation level. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 34(4), 203–211.

  25. Ozga, J. E., & Anderson, K. G. (2018). Reduction in delay discounting due to nicotine and its attenuation by cholinergic antagonists in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Psychopharmacology, 235(1), 155–168.

  26. Ozten, M., Erol, A., Karayilan, S., Kapudan, H., Orsel, E. S., & Kumsar, N. A. (2015). Impulsivity in bipolar and substance use disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 59, 28–32.

  27. Richards, J. B., Mitchell, S. H., De Wit, H., & Seiden, L. S. (1997). Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67(3), 353–366.

  28. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactic of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  29. Tian, L., Qin, X., Sun, J., Li, X., & Wei, L. (2016). Differential effects of co-administration of oxotremorine with SCH 23390 on impulsive choice in high-impulsive rats and low-impulsive rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & Behavior, 142, 56–63.

  30. Tricomi, E., Balleine, B. W., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2009). A specific role for posterior dorsolateral striatum in human habit learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29(11), 2225–2232.

  31. Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., & Green, L. (2016). Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human—Does it matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition, 42(2), 141–162.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the UAA Honors College’s Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholarship. Data from this manuscript were presented at the 44th annual conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis International in San Diego, California. The authors thank Kailey Tobin and Cassandra Anderson for assistance with data collection.

Author information

Correspondence to Gwen Lupfer.

Ethics declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed, and procedures were approved by the university’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC IRBNet protocol # 767807).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prince, A., Murphy, E.S. & Lupfer, G. Effects of Food Restriction and Pre-Training Length on Delay Discounting in Male Wistar Rats. Psychol Rec (2020) doi:10.1007/s40732-019-00371-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delay discounting
  • Impulsivity
  • Food restriction
  • Magnitude effect