Implicit and Explicit Measures of Transformation of Function from Facial Expressions of Fear and of Happiness via Equivalence Relations
- 225 Downloads
Studies on equivalence relations have suggested that abstract symbols might acquire emotional functions when related to facial expressions. The present study aimed to investigate the transformation of emotional functions from facial expressions of fear and of happiness to abstract stimuli via equivalence relations. A delayed matching-to-sample task established two equivalence classes between facial expressions of emotions and nonsense abstract stimuli: A1(Fear)-B1-C1-D1; A2(Happiness)-B2-C2-D2. After relational training (AB, AC, CD) and equivalence tests (BD, DB), the participants evaluated the meaning of one nonsense stimulus from each class (D1 and D2) by means of a semantic differential and an Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). Results from both the semantic differential and the IRAP supported the conclusion that the emotional functions of the faces, in terms of fear and happiness, had transformed via the equivalence classes to the D stimuli. Results are discussed in terms of the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding.
KeywordsEquivalence relations Transformation of function Semantic differential IRAP Facial expression
The present research was supported by means of a research funding from the São Paulo Research Foundation on behalf of William F. Perez (FAPESP 2016/05935-6). The second author was supported by a post-doc fellowship from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2014/01874-7 and 2017/10037-0). Preparation of the manuscript was supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq, Grants 573972/2008-7 and 465686/2014-1) and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Grant 2008/57705-8), both for Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino (INCT-ECCE), chaired by Deisy G. de Souza (UFSCar).
The present research was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2014/01874-7, 2016/05935-6, 2017/10037-0, 2008/57705-8) and by the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq, Grants 573972/2008-7 and 465686/2014-1); the present study is also part of the research program of the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino (INCT-ECCE).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research is approved by the Brazilian platform for ethical committees (Plataforma Brasil, CAAE # 54489116.4.0000.5504).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., & Luciano, C. (2016). Relational frame theory: Finding its historical and philosophical roots and reflecting upon its future development: An introduction to part II. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 117–128). West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.Google Scholar
- Barnes-Holmes, Y., Boorman, J., Oliver, J. E., Thompson, M., McEnteggart, C., & Coulter, C. (2018). Using conceptual developments in RFT to direct case formulation and clinical intervention: Two case summaries. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bortoloti, R., & de Rose, J. C. (2007). Medida do grau de relacionamento entre estímulos equivalentes. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 20, 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722007000200011.
- Bortoloti, R., & de Rose, J. C. (2008). Transferência de “significado” de expressões faciais apresentadas brevemente para estímulos abstratos equivalentes a elas. Acta Comportamentalia, 16, 223–241.Google Scholar
- Bortoloti, R., & de Rose, J. C. (2012). Equivalent stimuli are more strongly related after training with delayed matching than after simultaneous matching: A study using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP). The Psychological Record, 62, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Almeida, J. H., Bortoloti, R., Ferreira, P. R. S., Schelini, P. W., & de Rose, J. C. (2014). Análise das propriedades psicométricas de instrumento de diferencial semântico [Psychometric analysis of a semantic differential instrument]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.20142720.Google Scholar
- de Rose, J. C., & Bortoloti, R. (2007). A equivalência de estímulos como modelo de significado. Acta Comportamentalia, 15, 83–102.Google Scholar
- de Rose, J. C., McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., Galpin, V. C., & Stoddard, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discriminations established by indirect relations to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Schryver, M., Hussey, I., De Neve, J., Cartwright, A., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2018). The PI IRAP: An alternative scoring algorithm for the IRAP using a probabilistic semiparametric effect size measure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dougher, M., Augustson, E., Markham, M., Greenway, D., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1994.62-331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Bennett, M. (2013). Relational frame theory and experimental psychopathology. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research & application (pp. 199–218). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Paul Ekman Group. Retrieved from www.paulekman.com.
- Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). Exploring the single-trial-type-dominance-effect on the IRAP: Developing a differential arbitrarily applicable relational responding effects (DAARRE) model. The Psychological Record, 68, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0262-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Hughes, S., Hussey, I., Corrigan, B., Jolie, K., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Faking revisited: Exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kavanagh, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, Y., McEnteggart, C., & Finn, M. (2018). Exploring differential trial-type effects and the impact of a read-aloud procedure on deictic relational responding on the IRAP. The Psychological Record, 68, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0276-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Ruiz, F. J., Rodrıguez-Valverde, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Dougher, M. J., & Gutierrez-Martinez, O. (2014). Effects of an acceptance/defusion intervention on experimentally induced generalized avoidance: A laboratory demonstration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. I., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Parr, L. A., Winslow, J. T., Hopkins, W. D., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Recognizing facial cues: Individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perez, W. F., Kovac, R., Nico, Y., Caro, D. M., Fidalgo, A. P., Linares, I. ... de Rose, J. C. (2017). The transfer of Crel contextual control (same opposite, less then, more than) through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108, 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.164.
- Power, P. M., Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2017). Combining the implicit relational assessment procedure and the recording of event related potentials in the analysis of racial bias: A preliminary study. The Psychological Record, 67, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0252-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analyst, 22, 11–18.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research history. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
- Vahey, N. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). A first test of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. The Psychological Record, 59, 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vahey, N. A., Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar