Advances in Mechanistic Approaches to Quantifying Biophysical Fire Effects
Purpose of Review
The search for causal mechanisms in fire ecology has been slow to progress for two main reasons. First, many fire ecology investigations often occur after fires, with no detailed information on fire behavior. These fire effects are then used to infer both fire behavior and the subsequent effects themselves. Second, that fire behavior is heterogeneous at many scales both spatially and temporally, and that heat transfer occurs in three dimensions is only now being appreciated. Spatially and temporally resolved measurement of heat and mass transport in fires is difficult; and even when fire is measured, it is often measured in ways that are not relevant to the effects of interest. General measurements like flame length, rate of spread, and consumption are only approximate descriptors of a complicated energy transfer environment and are of limited use when linking fires to their effects.
We review both progress in biophysical fire ecology and present recent advances in technology and analytical techniques used for measuring the fire environment. We discuss not only how models of fire-induced injury can be partitioned into belowground, stems, and crowns but also how understanding synergy among these injuries will be necessary to improve our understanding of fire effects. We also present how there are emerging opportunities to apply computational fluid dynamic models to address issues of scaling in biophysical fire effects.
The conceptual linkage of fire energy release to mechanistic fire effects has value beyond simply understanding post-fire tree injury, function, and mortality. It can guide investigations that identify and isolate mechanisms driving other fire effects such as soil heating, organismal population dynamics, and biogeochemistry.
KeywordsFire behavior Fire ecology Fire effects Tree mortality Wildland fire
The authors would like to thank Dr. Marty Alexander for the opportunity to develop this review article and recognize his helpful reviews for its thoroughness and clarity. We also recognize two anonymous reviewers for their improvements to drafts of this manuscript.
Funding was provided by Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, and the USDA Forest Service Center for Disturbance Science, Athens GA.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
- 1.Byram GM. Combustion of forest fuels. In: Davis KP, editor. Forest fire: control and use. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1959. p. 61–89.Google Scholar
- 5.Methven IR. Fire research at the Petawawa Forest Experiment Station: the integration of fire behaviour and forest ecology for management purposes. In: Dubè DE, editor. Fire Ecology in Resource Management: Workshop Proceedings. Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forest Research Centre Information Report NOR-X-210; 1978. p. 23–27.Google Scholar
- 7.Wade DD. Linking fire behavior to its effects on living plant tissue. In: Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters 1986 National Convention, Birmingham, 1986; p. 112–116.Google Scholar
- 8.Burrows ND. A framework for assessing acute impacts of fire in jarrah forests for ecological studies. CALM Science Supplement. 1995;4:59–66.Google Scholar
- 9.Johnson E, Miyanishi K. Strengthening fire ecology’s roots. In: Johnson E, Miyanishi K, editors. Forest fires: behavior and ecological effects. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001. p. 1–9.Google Scholar
- 26.• Dickinson MB, Hudak AT, Zajkowski T, Loudermilk EL, Schroeder W, Ellison L, et al. Measuring radiant emissions from entire prescribed fires with ground, airborne and satellite sensors—RxCADRE 2012. Int J Wildland Fire. 2016;25:48–61. Contrasts measurements of fire radiant heat using different platforms and different scales. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.• O'Brien JJ, Loudermilk EL, Hornsby B, Hudak AT, Bright BC, Dickinson MB, et al. High-resolution infrared thermography for capturing wildland fire behaviour: RxCADRE 2012. Int J Wildland Fire. 2016;25:62–75. Details techniques and utility of spatially and temporally explicit measurements of fire heat release. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.•• O'Brien JJ, Loudermilk EL, Hiers JK, Hornsby B, Pokswinski S, Hudak AT, et al. Canopy derived fuels drive patterns of in-fire energy release and understory plant mortality in a longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) sandhill in Northwest FL, USA. Can J Remote Sens. 2016;42:489–500. Captures the explicit link between spatial variation in fire heat release, overstory derived fuels, and plant community dynamics for the first time. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Mitchell RJ, Hiers JK, O'Brien J, Starr G. Ecological forestry in the southeast: understanding the ecology of fuels. J For. 2009;107:391–7.Google Scholar
- 38.Van Wagner CE. Two solitudes in forest fire research. Petwawa Forest Experiment Station, Chalk River, ON: Canadian Forestry Service; 1971. Information Report PS-X-29.Google Scholar
- 41.Linn RR, Cunningham P. Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2005;110(D13).Google Scholar
- 47.Andrews PL. BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 5.0: Variables. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service; 2009. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-213 Revised.Google Scholar
- 50.Cunningham P, Linn RR. Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere-fire model: dynamics of fire spread. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2007;112(D5).Google Scholar
- 58.•• West AG, Nel JA, Bond WJ, Midgley JJ. Experimental evidence for heat plume-induced cavitation and xylem deformation as a mechanism of rapid post-fire tree mortality. New Phytol. 2016;211:828–38. Critically examines the physiological link between fire energy release and mortality. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Johansen RW, Wade DD. Effects of crown scorch on survival and diameter growth of slash pines. South J Appl For. 1987;11:180–4.Google Scholar
- 66.•• Smith AMS, Sparks AM, Kolden CA, Abatzoglou JT, Talhelm AF, Johnson DM, et al. Towards a new paradigm in fire severity research using dose–response experiments. Int J Wildland Fire. 2016;25:158–66. Suggests a novel approach for linking fire energy transfer to physiological impacts. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 67.•• Smith AM, Talhelm AF, Johnson DM, Sparks AM, Kolden CA, Yedinak KM, et al. Effects of fire radiative energy density dose on Pinus contorta and Larix occidentalis seedling physiology and mortality. Int J Wildland Fire. 2017;26:82–94. Tests the utility of the dose dependence approach on mechanisms driving fire effects. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Canham CDW, Cole J, Lauenroth WK. Models in ecosystem science. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 71.• Hudak AT, Dickinson MB, Bright BC, Kremens RL, Loudermilk EL, O’Brien JJ, et al. Measurements relating fire radiative energy density and surface fuel consumption–RxCADRE 2011 and 2012. Int J Wildland Fire. 2016;25:25–37. Connects fire radiative energy to fuel consumption and thus total energy release. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Silva C, Hudak AT, Lieberman R, Satterberg K, Carlos L, Rodriguez E. LiDAR remote sensing to individual tree processing: a comparison between high and low pulse density in Florida, United States of America. In: XVI Brazilian Remote Sensing Symposium, Foz do Iguaçú, Brazil. 2013. p. 6073–6080.Google Scholar
- 84.Belov S. Forest pyrology (in Russian), Leningrad forestry academy of the USSR, St. Petersburg. 1976.Google Scholar
- 85.Furyaev VV, VAganov EA, Tchebakova NM, Valendik EN. Effects of fire and climate on successions and structural changes in the Siberian boreal forest. Eurasian Journal of Forest Research. 2001;2:1–15.Google Scholar
- 88.•• Dell JE, Richards LA, O'Brien JJ, Loudermilk EL, Hudak AT, Pokswinski SM et al. Overstory-derived surface fuels mediate plant species diversity in frequently burned longleaf pine forests. Ecosphere. 2017;8(10). Explicitly connects spatial variation of vegetation to fuels then subsequently to post-fire effects. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 90.Hillel D, editor. Environmental soil physics: fundamentals, applications, and environmental considerations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998.Google Scholar
- 92.Coleman D. Through a ped darkly: an ecological assessment of root-soil-microbial-faunal interactions. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB, editors. Ecological interactions in soil: plants, microbes and animals. Oxford: Blackwell. British Ecological Society special publication,1985;4:1–21.Google Scholar
- 95.DeBano LF, Neary DG, Ffolliott PF, editors. Fire effects on ecosystems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
- 120.Cohen WB, Omi PN, Kaufmann MR. Heating-related water transport to intact lodgepole pine branches. For Sci. 1990;36:246–54.Google Scholar
- 127.Hudak AT, Freeborn PH, Lewis SA, Hood SM, Smith HY, Hardy CC, et al. The Cooney ridge fire experiment: an early operation to relate pre-, active, and post-fire field and remotely sensed measurements. Firehouse. 2018;1(1):10.Google Scholar
- 143.Noonan-Wright EK, Opperman TS, Finney MA, Zimmerman GT, Seli RC, Elenz LM et al. Developing the US wildland fire decision support system. Journal of Combustion. 2011; Article ID 168473.Google Scholar
- 146.Hoffman CM, Morgan P, Mell W, Parsons R, Strand E, Cook S. Surface fire intensity influences simulated crown fire behavior in lodgepole pine forests with recent mountain pine beetle-caused tree mortality. For Sci. 2013;59:390–9.Google Scholar