Field test study and quasi-static analysis of global characteristics and survivability of a wave energy converter test platform mooring system

  • Junhui Lou
  • Solomon C. YimEmail author
  • Joshua Baker
  • Ean Amon
  • Annette von Jouanne
Case Study


This study presents a catenary spread mooring system design of a mobile ocean test berth, named the Ocean Sentinel (OS), and developed by the Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center to facilitate the ocean testing of wave energy converters (WECs). The original OS mooring design (which was similar to a conventional WEC point absorber mooring system) was evaluated through a field data analysis using a quasi-static approach. The field data analysis on the measurements of mooring tension and environmental conditions collected during an ocean test of the OS is based on a quasi-static analysis of the analytical catenary equations of mooring chains. Both global and survivability characteristics of the mooring system were evaluated. The global characteristics include the influence of the OS excursion on mooring tension, the directional control of the OS, and the environmental contributions of waves, current, and wind. The relationship between the dynamic mooring tension and the environmental conditions of waves and current was quantified through an empirical equation. It was found that the contribution of current to the mooring tension oscillation increased as the current velocity increased and was significant at high current velocity. The survivability characteristics include the anchor movability and strength capacities of mooring lines. Because anchor movement occurred near the end of the field test, a new systematic procedure of designing a mooring system with adequate anchor resistance was developed and applied to improve the OS mooring system design.


Wave energy converter Mooring system design Field data analysis Quasi-static analysis Waves and current loads Anchor movement 



Financial support from the Department of Energy Grant no. DE-FG36-08GO18179-M001 (Small Business Innovative Research and Small Business Technology Transfer) is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Ambühl S, Sterndorff M, Sørensen JD (2014) Extrapolation of extreme response for different mooring line systems of floating wave energy converters. Int J Mar Energy 7:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amon E, Brekken TKA, von Jouanne A (2011) A power analysis and data acquisition system for ocean wave energy device testing. Renew Energy 36(7):1922–1930. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. API (1997) API-RP-2SK recommended practice for design and analysis of stationkeeping systems for floating structuresGoogle Scholar
  4. API (2007) API BULLETIN 2INT-MET interim guidance on hurricane conditions in the Gulf of MexicoGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker JL (2013) Mooring analysis of the ocean sentinel through field observation and numerical simulation. (Master of Science), Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Barltrop ND (ed) (1998) Floating structures: a guide for design and analysis, vol 1. Oilfield Pubns Inc., LedburyGoogle Scholar
  7. Brekken TKA, Rhinefrank K, von Jouanne A, Schacher A, Prudell J, Hammagren E (2013) Scaled Development of a novel wave energy converter including numerical analysis and high-resolution tank testing. Proc IEEE 101(4):866–875. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BV (2015) NR 493 DT R03 E classification of mooring systems for permanent and mobile offshore unitsGoogle Scholar
  9. CMPT (1998) Floating structures: a guide for the design and analysisGoogle Scholar
  10. DNV (2013) DNV-OS-E301 position mooring: DET NORSKE VERITASGoogle Scholar
  11. Elhanafi A, Macfarlane G, Fleming A, Leong Z (2017) Experimental and numerical investigations on the hydrodynamic performance of a floating-moored oscillating water column wave energy converter. Appl Energy 205:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald J, Bergdahl L (2007) Considering mooring cables for offshore wave energy conversions. Paper presented at the 7th European wave and tidal energy conference. Oporto, PortoGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunawardane SDGSP, Folley M, Kankanamge CJ (2019) Analysis of the hydrodynamics of four different oscillating wave surge converter concepts. Renew Energy 130:843–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hald T, Frigaard PB (2001) Forces and overtopping on 2. Generation wave dragon for nissum bredning. Aalborg University, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  15. Harnois V, Parish D, Johanning L (2012) Physical measurement of a slow drag of a drag embedment anchor during sea trials. Paper presented at the 4th international conference on ocean energy, DublinGoogle Scholar
  16. Harnois V, Johanning L, Thies PR (2013) Wave conditions inducing extreme mooring loads on a dynamically responding moored structureGoogle Scholar
  17. Harnois V, Weller SD, Johanning L, Thies PR, Le Boulluec M, Le Roux D, Soule V, Ohana J (2015) Numerical model validation for mooring systems: method and application for wave energy converters. Renew Energy 75:869–887. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris RE, Johanning L, Wolfram J (2004) Mooring systems for wave energy converters: a review of design issues and choices. Paper presented at the Marec 2004. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  19. Johanning L, Smith GH, Wolfram J (2007) Measurements of static and dynamic mooring line damping and their importance for floating WEC devices. Ocean Eng 34(14–15):1918–1934. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kofoed JP, Frigaard P, Friis-Madsen E, Sorensen HC (2006) Prototype testing of the wave energy converter wave dragon. Renew Energy 31(2):181–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann M, Elandt R, Shakeri M, Alam R (2014) The wave carpet: development of a submerged pressure differential wave energy converter. Paper presented at the 30th symposium on naval hydrodynamics. HobartGoogle Scholar
  22. Lettenmaier T, von Jouanne A, Amon E, Moran S, Gardiner A (2013) Testing the WET-NZ wave energy converter using the ocean sentinel instrumentation buoy. Mar Technol Soc J 47(4):164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinelli L, Ruol P, Cortellazzo G (2012) On mooring design of wave energy converters: the seabreath application. Coast Eng Proc 1(33):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martins JC, Goulart MM, Gomes MDN, Souza JA, Rocha LAO, Isoldi LA, dos Santos ED (2018) Geometric evaluation of the main operational principle of an overtopping wave energy converter by means of constructal design. Renew Energy 118:727–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricci P, Rico A, Ruiz-Minguela P, Boscolo F, Villate JL (2012) Design, modelling and analysis of an integrated mooring system for wave energy arrays. In: Paper presented at the in Proceedings of the 4th international conference on ocean energyGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodríguez R, Gorrochategui I, Vidal C, Guanche R, Cañizal J, Fraguela JA, Díaz V (2011) Anchoring systems for marine renewable energies offshore platforms. Paper presented at the in OCEANS, 2011 IEEE-Spain. SantanderGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruiz-Minguela J, Marion A, Prieto M, Roddriguez R, Ricci P, Fernandez D, Taboada M (2008) Design and testing of the mooring system for a new offshore wave energy converter. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on ocean energy. Brest, France, 15–17 October 2008, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  28. Salcedo F, Ruiz-Minguela P, Rodriguez R, Ricci P, Santos M (2009) Oceantec: sea trials of a quarter scale prototype. In: Paper presented at the in Proceedings of 8th European wave tidal energy conference. UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  29. SST (2009) Advanced anchoring and mooring studyGoogle Scholar
  30. Thies PR, Johanning L, Harnois V, Smith HCM, Parish DN (2014) Mooring line fatigue damage evaluation for floating marine energy converters: field measurements and prediction. Renew Energy 63:133–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. von Jouanne A, Lettenmaier T, Amon E, Brekken T, Phillips R (2013) A novel ocean sentinel instrumentation buoy for wave energy testing. Mar Technol Soc J 47(1):47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weller S, Hardwick J, Johanning L, Karimirad M, Teillant B, Raventos A, Sheng W (2014) Deliverable 4.1: a comprehensive assessment of the applicability of available and proposed offshore mooring and foundation technologies and design tools for array applicationsGoogle Scholar
  33. Zanuttigh B, Angelelli E, Kofoed JP (2013a) Effects of mooring systems on the performance of a wave activated body energy converter. Renew Energy 57:422–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zanuttigh B, Martinelli L, Castagnetti M (2013) Screening of suitable mooring systemsGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang X, Tian X, Xiao L, Li X, Chen L (2018a) Application of an adaptive bistable power capture mechanism to a point absorber wave energy converter. Appl Energy 228:450–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X, Lu D, Guo F, Gao Y, Sun Y (2018b) The maximum wave energy conversion by two interconnected floaters: effects of structural flexibility. Appl Ocean Res 71:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junhui Lou
    • 1
  • Solomon C. Yim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joshua Baker
    • 2
  • Ean Amon
    • 3
  • Annette von Jouanne
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Civil and Construction EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Civil Engineer Corps, US NavyWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Columbia Power TechnologiesCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringBaylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations