The impact of energy extraction of wave energy converter arrays on wave climate under multi-directional seas
This paper investigates the energy extraction of three types of wave energy converters (WEC) arranged in arrays and subjected to multi-directional seas of different wave spreading. The changes in the wave climate observed in the neighborhood of the arrays by their energy extraction were also reported. The hydrodynamic software, WAMIT, has been used to generate the performance of the WEC arrays in regular waves, whereas, a post-processing programming code developed in-house has been used to generate the device arrays’ performance in multi-directional seas characterized by single-peaked (JONSWAP and Bretschneider) and double-peaked (Ochi–Hubble) wave energy spectra. The results showed interesting findings on the WEC array performance and change in the wave environment around the devices, both strongly depend on the wave energy generation mechanism of the WECs and the wave spreading. The results obtained from the multi-directional seas with double-peaked wave spectrum showed significant differences in the energy production performance by the WEC arrays to those with single-peaked wave spectra. The uni-directional seas resulted in a larger q-factor. The q-factor differed with the peak wave periods, and at small wave periods, the q-factor for the terminator and attenuator WEC arrays are found to be higher than their counterparts for the point absorber WECs. With reference to the wave height modification in the neighborhood of the WEC arrays, the attenuator generated a greater wave disturbance followed by the terminator and point absorbers.
KeywordsMulti-directional sea Wave energy converter array q-Factor Wave climate Double-peaked wave spectrum Energy extraction
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the EcoWatt2050 research consortium (EPSRC Reference: EP/K012851/1).
- Babarit A, Hals J (2011) On the maximum and actual capture width ratio of wave energy converters. In: The 10th European wave energy conference, 5–9 September 2011, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
- Budal K (1977) Theory for absorption of wave power by a system of interacting bodies. J Ship Res 21:248–253Google Scholar
- DNV (2010) Recommended practice DNV-RP-C205: environmental conditions and environmental loads. Det Norske Veritas, Det Norske Veritas, NorwayGoogle Scholar
- Duarte T, Gueydon S, Jonkman J, Sarmento A (2014) Computation of wave loads under multidirectional sea states for floating offshore wind turbines. In: ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V09BT09A023–V09BT09A023Google Scholar
- Faltinsen OM (1993) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lee CH, Newman JN (2006) WAMIT user manual. WAMIT, IncGoogle Scholar
- Ochi MK, Hubble EN (1976) Six-parameter wave spectra. Coast Eng 1:301–328Google Scholar
- Sinha A, Karmakar D, Soares CG (2015) Effect of floater shapes on the power take-off of wave energy converters. In: Renewable energies offshore. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 375–382Google Scholar
- Tay ZY, Wei Y, Vakis AI (2018) Energy extraction of pontoon-type wave energy converter. In: ASME 2018 37th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, Madrid. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V010T09A037–V010T09A037Google Scholar
- Wang CM, Tay ZY (2010) Hydroelastic analysis and response of pontoon-type very large floating structures. In: Bungartz HJ, Mehl M, Schafer M (eds) Fluid structure interaction II. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar