Advertisement

Multi-Reservoir Utilization Planning to Optimize Hydropower Energy and Flood Control Simultaneously

  • Hamidreza Rahimi
  • Mostafa K. ArdakaniEmail author
  • Mohamadreza Ahmadian
  • Xiaonan Tang
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Optimizing the utilization of reservoirs has become an indispensable part of water resources planning. One of the challenges is how to overcome the conflict between the flood control and the revenue generated from hydropower energy. The Ostour and Pirtaghi reservoirs, which are crucial in Iran water system, are selected in this study. The aim is to find the optimal values for water release from each reservoir over a 12-month period to maximize both objective functions. The imperialist competitive algorithm is employed to optimize this multiobjective-nonlinear problem with complex constraints. It is observed that the imperialist competitive algorithm has a fast convergence and it is highly adaptable to defined constraints such as water release limitation, minimum downstream flow, water balance in reservoirs. This study results in better flood control and more revenue from the sale of hydropower energy. The paper also provides a systematic guidance to properly formulate and solve a multi-objective problem.

Keywords

Flood control Hydropower energy Imperialist competitive algorithm Multi-objective optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of the journal for their constructive comments, which significantly helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Afrozi MN, Aghdam MH, Naebi A, Aghdam SH (2011) Simulation and optimization of asynchronous AC motor control by particle swarm optimization (PSO) and emperor algorithm. In: 2011 UKSim 5th European symposium on computer modeling and simulation 251–256, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshar A, Emami Skardi MJ, Masoumi F (2015) Optimizing water supply and hydropower reservoir operation rule curves: an imperialist competitive algorithm approach. Eng Optim 47(9):1208–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afshar MH (2013) Extension of the constrained particle swarm optimization algorithm to optimal operation of multi-reservoirs system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 51:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmadebrahimpour E (2019) Optimal operation of reservoir systems using the wolf search algorithm (WSA). Water Sci Technol Water Supply 19(5):1396–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ardakani MK (2016) The impacts of errors in factor levels on robust parameter design optimization. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(5):1591–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardakani MK, Noorossana R (2008) A new optimization criterion for robust parameter design–the case of target is best. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(9–10):851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ardakani MK, Wulff SS (2013) An overview of optimization formulations for multi-response surface problems. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ardakani MK, Noorossana R, Niaki STA, Lahijanian H (2009) Robust parameter design using the weighted metric method—the case of ‘the smaller the better’. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 19(1):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: Evolutionary computation. CEC 2007. IEEE Congress, 4661–4667Google Scholar
  10. Azadnia A, Zahraie B (2010) Application of multi-objective particle swarm optimization in operation management of reservoirs with sedimentation problems. In: World environmental and water resources congress 2010: challenges of change, 2260–2268Google Scholar
  11. Chang FJ, Chen L (1998) Real-coded genetic algorithm for rule-based flood control reservoir management. Water Resour Manag 12:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiang PK, Willems P (2015) Combine evolutionary optimization with model predictive control in real-time flood control of a river system. Water Resour Manag 29:2527–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deb K (2014) Multi-objective Optimization. In: Burke E, Kendall G (eds) Search methodologies. Springer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Haddad OB, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Loáiciga HA (2015) Biogeography-based optimization algorithm for optimal operation of reservoir systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(1):04015034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hojjati A, Monadi M, Farid A, Mohammadi M (2018) Application and comparison of NSGA-II and MOPSO in multi-objective optimization of water resources systems. J Hydrol Hydromech 66:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosseini-Moghari SM, Morovati R, Moghadas M, Araghinejad S (2015) Optimum operation of reservoir using two evolutionary algorithms: imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA). Water Resour Manag 29(10):3749–3769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Idoumghar L, Chérin N, Siarry P, Roche R, Miraoui A (2013) Hybrid ICA–PSO algorithm for continuous optimization. Appl Math Comput 219(24):11149–11170Google Scholar
  18. Jia B, Simonovic SP, Zhong P, Yu Z (2016) A multi-objective best compromise decision model for real-time flood mitigation operations of multi-reservoir system. Water Resour Manag 30:3363–3387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jothiprakash V, Arunkumar R (2013) Optimization of hydropower reservoir using evolutionary algorithms coupled with chaos. Water Resour Manag 27:1963–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karami H, Mousavi SF, Farzin S, Ehteram M, Singh VP, Kisi O (2018) Improved krill algorithm for reservoir operation. Water Resour Manag 32(10):3353–3372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar DN, Reddy MJ (2006) Ant colony optimization for multi-purpose reservoir operation. Water Resour Manag 20:879–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li L, Liu P, Rheinheimer DE, Deng C, Zhou Y (2014) Identifying explicit formulation of operating rules for multi-reservoir systems using genetic programming. Water Resour Manag 28:1545–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehdipour EF, Haddad OB, Orouji H, Marino MA (2013) Application of genetic programming in stage hydrograph routing of open channels. Water Resour Manag 27:3261–3272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noori M, Othman F, Sharifi MB, Heydari M (2013) Multi objective operation optimization of reservoirs using genetic algorithm (case study: Ostoor and Pirtaghi reservoirs in Ghezel Ozan Watershed), 2nd international conference on environment. Energy Biotechnol 51(10):49–54Google Scholar
  25. Tayfur G (2017) Modern optimization methods in water resources planning, engineering and management. Water Resour Manag 31(10):3205–3233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yaseen ZM, Karami H, Ehteram M, Mohd NS, Mousavi SF, Hin LS, El-Shafie A (2018) Optimization of reservoir operation using new hybrid algorithm. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(11):4668–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao T, Zhao J, Yang D (2014) Improved dynamic programming for hydropower reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plann Manage 140(3):365–374.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamidreza Rahimi
    • 1
  • Mostafa K. Ardakani
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mohamadreza Ahmadian
    • 3
  • Xiaonan Tang
    • 4
  1. 1.University of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland
  2. 2.Florida Polytechnic UniversityLakelandUSA
  3. 3.Ferdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  4. 4.Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversitySuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations