Advertisement

Environmental Processes

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 789–806 | Cite as

The Coordination and Dynamic Relationship of the Industrial Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and SO2 Emission —Analysis of Time Series Data of China from 1990 to 2016

  • Wu Mingran
  • Zhao Min
  • Wu Zhaodan
Original Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the current situation of China’s industrial ecological development, this article constructs the system of industrial “energy-SO2-economy” and uses the vector autoregressive model, impulse response function and variance decomposition to analyse the coordination and dynamic relationship between the three factors. The results show that there is a long-term, stable correlation between industrial energy consumption, SO2 emission, and industrial economic growth during the research period, which is in accordance with the status quo of the early development level of China’s industrialization. The industrial economic growth of China relies heavily on resource consumption and has caused serious damage to the environment, and this development pattern is not sustainable. Therefore, the government should vigorously promote the coordinated development of the economy and ecosystem in the process of industrial growth, as well as take the road of sustainable development with low resource consumption, less pollution and high ecological security.

Keywords

Industrial energy consumption SO2 emission Industrial economic growth Dynamic relationship Ecological civilization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41401634) and the Fundamental Research Funds from the Central Universities (Grant No. 2016B31914).

References

  1. Abdulkadir AR, Ilhan O (2017) Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: evidence from combined co-integration test. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75(8):1130–1141Google Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723Google Scholar
  3. Asma E, Leila HK (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and sustainable development: the case of the Union for the Mediterranean countries. Energy 71(7):218–225Google Scholar
  4. Bovenberg AL, Smulders SA (1996) Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model. Int Econ Rev 37(4):861–893Google Scholar
  5. Chor FT, Bee WT, Ilhan O (2016) Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(2):1506–1514Google Scholar
  6. Dai ZM, Zeng YH, Guo L (2016) Research of the industrial eco-efficiency with the panel data in East China—based on the super efficiency DEA model. Soft. Science 7:35–39Google Scholar
  7. Deng RB, Liu Y (2016) Industrial agglomeration, spatial overflow and regional economic growth - based on the research of spatial panel Dubin model. Inquiry into Economic Issues 1:66–76Google Scholar
  8. Department of Energy Statistics. (2017) China energy statistical yearbook 2017, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  9. Deviren SA, Deviren B (2016) The relationship between carbon dioxide emission and economic growth: hierarchical structure methods. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 451:429–439Google Scholar
  10. Ellene K, John K, Curtis MJ (2010) Energy consumption and economic development in sub-Sahara Africa. Energy Econ 32(3):532–537Google Scholar
  11. Friedl G (2003) Determinants of CO2 emission in a small open economy. Ecol Econ 5(1):133–148Google Scholar
  12. Grossman GM, Alan BK (1991) Environment Impact of North Amercian Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper no.3914Google Scholar
  13. Grossman GM, Alan BK (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377Google Scholar
  14. Guo L, Xu SQ (2016) Industrial eco-efficiency with the integration super efficiency DEA: the central six provinces 2003-2013 data as an example. Econ Geogr (6):116–121+58Google Scholar
  15. Howarth RB, Norgaad RB (1998) Environmental valuation under sustainable development. Am Econ Rev 34:82–83Google Scholar
  16. Jaffe AB, Robert NS (1995) Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J Environ Econ Manag 29(3):S43–S63Google Scholar
  17. Kathia P (2017) Dynamics between energy consumption and economic growth in Ecuador: a granger causality analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy 9:1–14Google Scholar
  18. Konstantion B, Nijkamp P (1996) Environmental-economic modeling with semantic insufficiency and factual uncertainty. Environmental System 25:167–183Google Scholar
  19. Lee JW, Brahmasrene T (2013) Investigating the influence of tourism on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from panel analysis of the European Union. Tour Manag 38(13):69–76Google Scholar
  20. Li SS (2016) The ecological risk in China's industrialization and its countermeasures. Social Sciences Academic Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  21. Li B, Cao WL (2014) The decoupling analysis between economic development and environmental pollution. Econ Perspect 7:48–56Google Scholar
  22. Liu XM, Meng XR, Wang KL (2016) Measurement and evaluation of urban industrial ecological efficiency: empirical evidence from Anhui Province. East China Economic Management 8:29–34Google Scholar
  23. Lu HF, Lin BL, Daniel EC (2016) Interactions among energy consumption, economic development and greenhouse gas emissions in Japan after world war II. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(2):1060–1072Google Scholar
  24. Mehd A (2015) The close relationship between informal economic growth and carbon emissions in Tunisia since 1980: the (ir)relevance of structural breaks. Sustainable Cities and Society 15:11–21Google Scholar
  25. Mingworth V (1996) The Penguin Dictionary of Physics. Foreign Language Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Muhammad S, Thi HVH, Mantu KM et al (2017) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63(3):199–212Google Scholar
  27. National Bureau of Statistics. (2017) China statistical yearbook 2017, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  28. Oleg E (1994) Economic growth with environmental damage and technical progress. Environ Resour Econ 4:241–249Google Scholar
  29. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2012) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36(c):262–267Google Scholar
  30. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36(s 1–2):262–267Google Scholar
  31. Porter M (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264(4):193–246Google Scholar
  32. Porter M, Linde VD (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118Google Scholar
  33. Seema N (2016) Predictability within the energy consumption–economic growth nexus: some evidence from income and regional groups. Econ Model 54(4):515–521Google Scholar
  34. Seyma AD, Bayram D (2016) The relationship between carbon dioxide emission and economic growth: hierarchical structure methods. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 451:429–439Google Scholar
  35. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46(Suppl 1):753–773Google Scholar
  36. Shahbaz M, Hye Q, Tiwari AK, Leitao NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121Google Scholar
  37. Sheng N (2014) Can industrial agglomeration improve environmental efficiency? — spatial empirical test based on City data in China. J Ind Eng/ Eng Manag 3:57–63+10Google Scholar
  38. Sheng YX, Ou MH, Liu Q (2015) Methods of measuring decoupling of resource environment: speed decoupling or quantity decoupling? China Population, Resources and Environment 3:99–103Google Scholar
  39. Smis AC (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48Google Scholar
  40. Tang CF, Tan BW, Ozturk I (2016) Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(11):1506–1514Google Scholar
  41. Wagner M (2008) The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resour Energy Econ 30(3):388–408Google Scholar
  42. Wang KL, Zhang CY, Meng XR (2016) Research on the heterogeneity of China’s regional industrial eco-efficiency from the perspective of environmental pressure. Science and Technology Management Research 10:242–248Google Scholar
  43. Wu MR, Zhao M (2016) The dynamic relationship between energy Consumption, environmental pollution and economic growth—based on the time series data of China from the year 1990 to 2014. Technoeconomics & Management Research 12:25–29Google Scholar
  44. Zhang K, Dou JM (2016) Do industrial agglomeration reduce emissions? Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition) 4:99–109Google Scholar
  45. Zhang WM, Fang QM, Liu T (2015) Eco-efficiency evaluation of urban industries: taking Hunan Province for example. Urban Problems 3:62–66+104Google Scholar
  46. Zhang LY, Li Y, Zhang J (2017) The relationships among energy consumption, economic output and energy intensity of countries at different stage of development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74(7):258–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wu Mingran
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zhao Min
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wu Zhaodan
    • 4
  1. 1.School of BusinessHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Science and Technology System Reform Thinking Tank of Jiangsu ProvinceNanjingChina
  3. 3.ArlingtonUSA
  4. 4.School of Business AdministrationHohai UniversityChangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations