Advertisement

Land Accounts in the River Basin Districts of Greece

  • Georgios Bariamis
  • Georgios Paschos
  • Evangelos Baltas
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Land is a highly valuable natural resource, where all human activities take place by exploiting natural goods for socio-economic development. The competition for land resources is increasing with pristine soils of unoccupied land being very precious for agricultural use (food production) and infrastructure development. International efforts have been made in assessing and quantifying the natural capital reserves and ecosystem services through lately led conceptual approaches such as the land and ecosystems extend accounting. This research conducted at the national level of Greece and in the 14 river basin districts (RBDs), revealed the main drivers of change in land cover stocks, as well as future trends in a non-spatially explicit context. In Greece, the analysis for the last 23 years has shown that the land resources are intensively exploited with significant piece of land being transformed into urban fabric and other man-transformed surfaces supporting a more urbanized manner of socio-economic development. The expansion of artificial surfaces is a phenomenon met in all RBDs of the country. The significant reduction of forests increases the flood risks, especially in peri-urban areas, while the reduction of forests in low-lying lands used for intense agriculture reduces aquifer recharge and impairs water quality due to the use of fertilizers and pesticides. An attempt has been made to estimate the main trends with a 50-year projection horizon; the current trends are anticipated to continue (+17% expansion of urban fabric) with significant land surface being converted from natural to other uses.

Keywords

Land accounts Urbanization Agricultural development Forest loss Natural capital 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An initial shorter version of the paper has been presented at the 10th World Congress of the European Water Resources Association (EWRA2017) “Panta Rhei”, Athens, Greece, 5-9 July, 2017 (http://ewra2017.ewra.net).

References

  1. Astaraie-Imani M, Kapelan Z, Fu G, Butler D (2012) Assessing the combined effects of urbanisation and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK. J Environ Manag 112:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atmadja SS, Sills EO (2016) What is a “Community perception” of REDD+? A systematic review of how perceptions of REDD+ have been elicited and reported in the literature. PLoS One 11:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bariamis G, Baltas E, Tsihrintzis V, Mimikou M (2017) A land accounting system for integrated water resources management. Eur Water 60(7):49–54. http://www.ewra.net/ew/issue_60.htm Google Scholar
  4. Bariamis G, Zachos A, Panagos D, Konstantinou I, Baltas E, Mimikou M, Zal N (2016) "Use of freshwater resources in Europe 2002–2012". Supplementary document to the European Environment Agency’s core set indicator 018. ETC/ICM Technical Report 1/2016, Magdeburg: European Topic Centre on inland, coastal and marine waters, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bariamis G, Zal N, Scholz M, Bastrup-Birk Α, Tekidou A, Kasperidus HD, Baltas E, Mimikou M (2015) Water-retention potential of Europe’s forests, EEA Technical Report No 13/2015Google Scholar
  6. Bertsekas PD, Tsitsiklis NJ (2000) Introduction to Probability. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Blasco J, Navarro-Ortega A, Barceló D (2015) Towards a better understanding of the links between stressors, hazard assessment and ecosystem services under water scarcity. Sci Total Environ 503–504:1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonsch M, Popp A, Biewald A, Biewald A, Rolinski A, Schmitz C, Weindl I, Stevanovich M, Hogner K, Heinke J, Ostberg S, Dietrich JP, Bodirsky B, Lotze-Campen H, Humpenoder F (2015) Environmental flow provision: Implications for agricultural water and land-use at the global scale. Glob Environ Chang 30:113–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Tong STY, Yang H, Yang YJ (2015) Simulating the hydrologic impacts of land-cover and climate changes in a semi-arid watershed. Hydrol Sci J 60:1739–1758.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.948445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbelle-Rico E, Butsic V, Enríquez-García MJ, Radeloff VC (2015) Technology or policy? Drivers of land cover change in northwestern Spain before and after the accession to European Economic Community. Land Use Policy 45:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Arroyo MK, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:362–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10044-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel CJ, Frid L, Sleeter BM, Fortin MJ (2016) State-and-transition simulation models: a framework for forecasting landscape change. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1413–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond MA, Loveland TR (2010) Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the eastern United States. Bioscience 60:286–298.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.4.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duh JD, Shandas V, Chang H, George LA (2008) Rates of urbanisation and the resiliency of air and water quality. Sci Total Environ 400:238–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.002
  16. Dutta D, Vaze J, Kim S, Hughes J, Yang A, Teng J, Lerat J (2017) Development and application of a large scale river system model for National Water Accounting in Australia. J Hydrol 547:124–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EEA (2006) Land accounts for Europe 1990–2000: Towards integrated land and ecosystem accountingGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2011) State of the World’s ForestsGoogle Scholar
  19. Geri F, Amici V, Rocchini D (2010) Human activity impact on the heterogeneity of a Mediterranean landscape. Appl Geogr 30:370–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gingrich S, Niedertscheider M, Kastner T, Haberl H, Cosor G, Krausmann F, Kuemmerle T, Muller D, Reith-Musel A, Rudbeck Jepsen M, Vadineanu A, Erb KH (2015) Exploring long-term trends in land use change and aboveground human appropriation of net primary production in nine European countries. Land Use Policy 47:426–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gyamfi C, Ndambuki J, Salim R (2016) Hydrological responses to land use/cover changes in the Olifants Basin, South Africa. Water 8:588.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haberl H (2015) Competition for land: A sociometabolic perspective. Ecol Econ 119:424–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hellenic National Meteorological Service. The Climate of Greece. http://www.hnms.gr/hnms/english/climatology/climatology_html? Accessed 19 Dec 2017
  24. Hughes SJ, Cabral JA, Bastos R, Cortes R, Vicente J, Eitelberg D, Yu H, Honrado J, Santos M (2016) A stochastic dynamic model to assess land use change scenarios on the ecological status of fluvial water bodies under the Water Framework Directive. Sci Total Environ 565:427–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan S, Myint SW, Fan C, Brazel AJ (2014) Quantifying outdoor water consumption of urban land use/land cover: sensitivity to drought. Environ Manag 53:855–864.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0245-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karp DS, Tallis H, Sachse R, Halpern B, Thonicke K, Cramer W, Mooney H, Polasky S, Tietjen B, Waha K, Walz A, Wolny S (2015) National indicators for observing ecosystem service change. Glob Environ Chang 35:12–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu J (2009) A GIS-based tool for modelling large-scale crop-water relations. Environ Model Softw 24:411–422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maes J, Fabreaga N, Zulian G, Barbosa A, Vizcaino P, Ivits E, Polce C, Vandecasteele I, Rivero IM, Guerra C, Castillo CP, Vallecillo S, Baranzelli C, Barrance R, Batista e Silva F, Jacobs-Crison C, Trombetti M, Lavalle C (2013) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their ServicesGoogle Scholar
  29. Maimaitijiang M, Ghulam A, Sandoval JSO, Maimaitiyiming M (2015) Drivers of land cover and land use changes in St. Louis metropolitan area over the past 40 years characterized by remote sensing and census population data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 35:161–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGrane SJ (2016) Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review. Hydrol Sci J 61:2295–2311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miguel Ayala L, van Eupen M, Zhang G, Perez-Soba M, Martorano LG, Lisboa LS, Beltrao NE (2016) Impact of agricultural expansion on water footprint in the Amazon under climate change scenarios. Sci Total Environ 569:1159–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller JD, Hutchins M (2017) The impacts of urbanisation and climate change on urban flooding and urban water quality: A review of the evidence concerning the United Kingdom. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:345–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ooi GL (2009) Challenges of sustainability for Asian urbanisation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1:187–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paschos G, Bariamis G, Baltas E (2017) Land accounting perspective on water resources management. Eur Water 60(22):161–166. http://www.ewra.net/ew/issue_60.htm Google Scholar
  36. Pedro-Monzonís M, Jiménez-Fernández P, Solera A, Jiménez-Gavilán P (2016) The use of AQUATOOL DSS applied to the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water (SEEAW). J Hydrol 533:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schilling KE, Jha MK, Zhang Y-K, Gassman P, Wolter C (2008) Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. Water Resour Res 44:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schulz JJ, Cayuela L, Echeverria C, Salas J, Benayas JMR (2010) Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975-2008). Appl Geogr 30:436–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Serbina L, Miller HM (2014) Landsat and Water - Case Studies of the Uses and Benefits of Landsat Imagery in Water Resources. Open-File Rep 2014-1108:61.  https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141108/ Google Scholar
  40. Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra L (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16083–16088.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shan Y, Yang L, Perren K, Zhang Y (2015) Household water consumption: Insight from a survey in Greece and Poland. Procedia Eng 119:1409–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sleeter BM, Wilson TS, Sharygin E, Sherba J (2017) Future scenarios of land change based on empirical data and demographic trends. Earth’s Futur:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eft2.262
  43. Sonter LJ, Johnson JA, Nicholson CC, Richardson LL, Watson KB, Rickets TH (2017) Multi-site interactions: Understanding the offsite impacts of land use change on the use and supply of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 23:158–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Special Secretariat for Water - Ministry of Environment and Energy River Basin Management Plans. http://wfdver.ypeka.gr/en/home-en/. Accessed 16 Dec 2017
  45. Tolessa T, Senbeta F, Kidane M (2017) The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv 23:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Triantafyllopoulos N (2017) On the origins of tourist urbanisation in Greece: land speculation and property market (in) efficiency. Land Use Policy 68:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.007
  47. United Nations (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration. a/Res/55/2 9. doi: 0055951Google Scholar
  48. United Nations (2002) United Nations Report of the World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  49. United Nations (2015) 2030 Sustainable development agenda. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/. Accessed 7 Feb 2017
  50. United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, The World Bank (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting: a central frameworkGoogle Scholar
  51. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)Google Scholar
  52. Verkerk PJ, Lindner M, Pérez-Soba M, Paterson JS, Helming J, Verburg PH, Kuemmerle T, Lotze-Campen H, Moiseyev A, Muller D, Popp A, Schulp CJE, Sturk J, Tabeau A, Wolfslehner B, van der Zanden EH (2016) Identifying pathways to visions of future land use in Europe. Reg Environ Chang:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1055-7
  53. Viger RJ, Hay LE, Markstrom SL, Jones J, Buell G (2011) Hydrologic effects of urbanization and climate change on the Flint river basin, Georgia. Earth Interact 15:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010EI369.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vogl AL, Bryant BP, Hunink JE, Wolny S, Apse C, Droogers P (2017) Valuing investments in sustainable land management in the Upper Tana River basin, Kenya. J Environ Manag 195:78–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogl AL, Dennedy-Frank PJ, Wolny S, Johnson JA, Hamel P, Narain U, Vaidya A (2016) Managing forest ecosystem services for hydropower production. Environ Sci Pol 61:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang S, Fu BJ, Gao GY, Yao XL, Zhou J (2012) Soil moisture and evapotranspiration of different land cover types in the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:2883–2892.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2883-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson CO (2015) Land use/land cover water quality nexus: quantifying anthropogenic influences on surface water quality. Environ Monit Assess 187:424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4666-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson TS, Sleeter BM, Cameron DR (2017) Mediterranean California’s water use future under multiple scenarios of developed and agricultural land use change. PLoS One 12:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187181 Google Scholar
  59. World Bank (2010) Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services, WAVESGoogle Scholar
  60. World Resources Institute, United Nations Environment Programme, United Nations Development Programme, The World Bank (1996) The Urban EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  61. Zal N, Bariamis G, Zachos A, Baltas E, Mimikou M (2017) Use of Freshwater Resources in Europe – an assessment based on water quantity accounts. In: Künitzer A (ed) ETC/ICM Technical Report 1/2017. European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine Waters, Magdeburg, pp 75Google Scholar
  62. Zank B, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Villa F (2016) Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: A case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 149:31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou G, Wei X, Luo Y, Zhang M, Li Y, Qiao Y, Liu H, Wang C (2010) Forest recovery and river discharge at the regional scale of Guangdong Province, China. Water Resour Res 46.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008829

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations