Facilitating learning for students with special needs: a review of technology-supported special education studies
Owing to physical or mental disabilities, disabled students often come across more difficulties in learning. In an effort to improve their learning, researchers have adopted technology-supported tools to enhance disabled students’ adaptability to the learning environment and their learning achievement. The application of technology-supported special education has gradually increased in recent years. However, there is still a lack of investigation and analysis of the application and development trends of integrating technologies into special education. The aim of the present study was therefore to review technology-supported special education research articles by taking multiple dimensions into account, such as learning devices, learning strategies, learning domains and research issues, research subjects, types and level of disabilities, and learning environments. Based on the results, the number of studies has increased year by year, and the choice of learning devices and applications has become increasingly diverse; yet, the learning strategies still tend to be conservative since the majority of studies adopted the guided learning strategy. In addition, the application of technology has expanded to every learning domain, but is mainly focused on elementary school students and resource classrooms. Most importantly, the implementation of technology-supported special education tends not to result in teaching difficulties due to disabled students having different types and levels of disabilities. Further discussion and suggestions based on the findings can serve as a reference for teachers and researchers in special education.
KeywordsSpecial education Technology-supported learning Interactive learning environment Literature review Trend analysis
This study was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under contract numbers MOST 106-2511-S-152-012-MY3.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Moreover, the authors would like to state that there is no potential conflict of interest in this study, and the analyzed data can be provided upon requests via sending e-mails to the corresponding author.
The study has been examined and advised by an academic ethics review committee. As the data were collected from an online database rather than a group of subjects, there is no privacy or personal rights problem in this study.
- Avcioglu, H. (2013). Effectiveness of video modelling in training students with intellectual disabilities to greet people when they meet. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,13(1), 466–477.Google Scholar
- Blumberg, S. J., Bramlett, M. D., Kogan, M. D., Schieve, L. A., Jones, J. R., & Lu, M. C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged US children: 2007 to 2011–2012 (No. 65). US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- Drigas, A., Ioannidou, R. E., Kokkalia, G., & Lytras, M. D. (2014). ICTs, mobile learning and social media to enhance learning for attention difficulties. J. UCS,20(10), 1499–1510.Google Scholar
- Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Boykin, A., Good, K., Hughes, M., MacVittie, N.,… & Chirinos, D. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170–191Google Scholar
- Hu, X. Y., & Han, Z. R. (2019). Effects of gesture-based match-to-sample instruction via virtual reality technology for Chinese students with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities,65(5), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1602350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society,11(2), 81–91.Google Scholar
- Lamsa, J., Hamalainen, R., Aro, M., Koskimaa, R., & Ayramo, S. M. (2018). Games for enhancing basic reading and maths skills: A systematic review of educational game design in supporting learning by people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology,49(4), 596–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments,27(8), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Polat, E., Adiguzel, T., & Akgun, O. E. (2012). Adaptive web-assisted learning system for students with specific learning disabilities: A needs analysis study. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri,12(4), 3243–3258.Google Scholar
- Rakap, S. (2010). Impacts of learning styles and computer skills on adult students’ learning online. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,9(2), 108–115.Google Scholar
- Sara, S., & Heartley, H. (2019). Computer assisted instruction to teach academic content to students with intellectual disability: A review of the literature. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,124(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.4.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shih, C. H., Wang, S. H., & Wang, Y. T. (2014). Assisting children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to reduce the hyperactive behavior of arbitrary standing in class with a Nintendo Wii remote controller through an active reminder and preferred reward stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities,35(9), 2069–2076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker, Z., Vasquez, E., & Wienke, W. (2016). The impact of simulated interviews for individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,19(1), 76.Google Scholar