Journal of Computers in Education

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 167–190 | Cite as

Learning prosocial skills through multiadaptive games: a case study

  • Kiriakos StefanidisEmail author
  • Athanasios Psaltis
  • Konstantinos C. Apostolakis
  • Kosmas Dimitropoulos
  • Petros Daras


Digital games introduce an innovative means for teaching prosocial skills to students; however, the lack of proper personalization features in the games may result in the degradation of the learning process. This paper aims to study whether the performance of students in a prosocial game could be improved by an intelligent AI adaptation mechanism. To this end, a novel hybrid adaptation manager capable of assisting students playing prosocial games is presented. Our approach consists of a combination of two adaptation mechanisms that process personalization information both offline and in real-time. Both implementations are based on artificial intelligence techniques and adjust game content in order to increase the chances of players attaining the game’s specific learning objectives concerning prosocial skills. In particular, the online mechanism maintains a player engagement profile for game elements that are intended to represent the pedagogical practices of corrective feedback and positive reinforcement. On the other hand, offline adaptation matches players to game scenarios according to the players’ ability and the game scenarios’ ranking. The efficiency of the proposed adaptation manager as a tool for enhancing students’ performance in a prosocial game is demonstrated through a small-scale experiment, under real-time conditions in a school environment, using the prosocial game “Path of Trust.”


Game adaptation Prosocial skills Engagement Serious games 


  1. Annetta, L. A., Cheng, M. T., & Holmes, S. (2010). Assessing twenty first century skills through a teacher created video game for high school biology students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 101–114. Scholar
  2. Apostolakis, K., Psaltis, A., Stefanidis, K., Kaza, K., Thermos, S., Dimitropoulos, K., et al. (2016a). Exploring the prosociality domains of trust and cooperation, through single and cooperative digital gameplay in path of trust. International Journal of Serious Games, 3, 39–57. Scholar
  3. Apostolakis, K. C., Kaza, K., Psaltis, A., Stefanidis, K., Thermos, S., Dimitropoulos, K., et al. (2016b). Path of trust: A prosocial co-op game for building up trustworthiness and teamwork. In A. De Gloria & R. Veltkamp (Eds.), Games and learning alliance (pp. 80–89). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. Scholar
  5. Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2018). Conceptualising technology practice in education using Bourdieu’s sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 197–210. Scholar
  6. Bontchev, B. (2016). Adaptation in affective video games: A literature review. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 16(3), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bontchev, B., & Vassileva, D. (2017). Affect-based adaptation of an applied video game for educational purposes. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(1), 31–49. Scholar
  8. C.A.S.E.L. (2013). Effective Social and Emotional Learning Programs - Preschool and Elementary School Edition. Guide.Google Scholar
  9. Chanel, G., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., & Pun, T. (2011, Nov). Emotion assessment from physiological signals for adaptation of game difficulty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 41 (6), 1052-1063.
  10. Charles, D., McNeill, M., McAlister, M., Black, M., Moore, A., Stringer, K., et al. (2005). Player-centred game design: Player modelling and adaptive digital games. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views—Worlds in Play, pp. 285–298.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, C.-H., & Su, C.-H. (2012). A game-based learning system for improving student’s learning effectiveness in system analysis course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dinçer, S., & Doganay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 111, 74–100.Google Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elo, A. E. (1978). The rating of chessplayers, past and present. New York: Arco Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., & Ming, L. K. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752–763. Scholar
  18. Gilleade, K. M., Dix, A., & Allanson, J. (2005). Affective Videogames and Modes of Affective Gaming: Assist Me, Challenge Me, Emote Me (ACE). In DiGRA 2005—Proceedings of the 2005 DiGRA International Conference: Changing Views: Worlds in Play.Google Scholar
  19. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, ow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunicke, R. (2005). The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2005 acm sigchi international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology, New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 429–433.Google Scholar
  21. Kawatsu, C., Hubal, R., & Marinier, R. P. (2018). Predicting students decisions in a training simulation: A novel application of trueskill. IEEE Transactions on Games, 10(1), 97–100. Scholar
  22. Kaza, K., Psaltis, A., Stefanidis, K., Apostolakis, K. C., Dimitropoulos, K., & Daras, P. (2016). Body motion analysis for emotion recognition in serious games. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction-interaction techniques and environments (pp. 33–42). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Keltner, D., Kogan, A., Piff, P. K., & Saturn, S. R. (2014). The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: Core processes from gene to meme. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 425–60. Scholar
  24. Kickmeier, M., Mattheiss, E., Steiner, M., & Albert, D. (2011). 01). A psycho-pedagogical framework for multi-adaptive educational games. IJGBL, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar
  25. Koster, R. (2013). Theory of fun for game design (2nd ed.). California: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., & Yom-Tov, E. (2014). Measuring user engagement (Vol. 6). Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.
  27. Lavoué, E., Monterrat, B., Desmarais, M., & George, S. (2018). Adaptive gamification for learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.Google Scholar
  28. Law, E. L.-C., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Albert, D., & Holzinger, A. (2008). Challenges in the development and evaluation of immersive digital educational games. In A. Holzinger (Ed.), HCI and usability for education and work (pp. 19–30). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, B., & Riedl, M. O. (2010). An offline planning approach to game plotline adaptation. In AIIDE.Google Scholar
  30. Lopes, R., & Bidarra, R. (2011). Adaptivity challenges in games and simulations: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 3(2), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. M Steiner, C., Kickmeier, M., Mattheiss, E., & Albert, D. (2009). Undercover: Non-invasive, adaptive interventions in educational games. In Proceedings of 80Days’ 1st International Open Workshop on Intelligent Personalisation and Adaptation in Digital Educational Games.Google Scholar
  32. Newmann, F. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American Secondary Schools (p. 23). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nogueira, P. A., Rodrigues, R., & Oliveira, E. (2013). Real-time psychophysiological emotional state estimation in digital gameplay scenarios. In L. Iliadis, H. Papadopoulos, & C. Jayne (Eds.), Engineering applications of neural networks (pp. 243–252). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2012). Baker-Rodrigo observation method protocol 1.0 training manual. Quezon: Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  35. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50, 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Psaltis, A., Apostolakis, K. C., Dimitropoulos, K., & Daras, P. (2018). Multimodal student engagement recognition in prosocial games. IEEE Transactions on Games, 10(3), 292–303. Scholar
  37. Psaltis, A., Kaza, K., Stefanidis, K., Thermos, S., Apostolakis, K. C., Dimitropoulos, K., et al. (2016). Multimodal affective state recognition in serious games applications. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), pp. 435–439.Google Scholar
  38. Qin, H., Rau, P.-L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2010). Effects of different scenarios of game difficulty on player immersion. Interacting with Computers, 22(3), 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Star, K., Vuillier, L. & Deterding, S. (2016). D2.6 Prosocial Game design methodology. Technical Report, Prosocial Learn.Google Scholar
  40. Streicher, A., & Smeddinck, J. D. (2016). Personalized and Adaptive Serious Games. In Entertainment Computing and Serious Games: International GI-Dagstuhl Seminar 15283, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, July 5–10, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 332–377.
  41. Takahashi, T., Oyo, K., & Shinohara, S. (2009). A Loosely Symmetric Model of Cognition. In G. Kampis, I. Karsai, & E. Szathmáry (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann (pp. 238–245). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  42. Van Oostendorp, H., Van der Spek, E., & Linssen, J. (2013). Adapting the complexity level of a serious game to the proficiency of players. In P. Escudeiro & C. de Carvalho (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th european conference on games based learning, ecgbl 2013 (pp. 553-560). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.Google Scholar
  43. Weitze, C. L. (2014). Developing goals and objectives for gameplay and learning. In K. Schrier (Ed.), In learning, education and games: Curricular and design considerations (Vol. 1, pp. 225–249). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wouters, P., & Oostendorp, H. V. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 412–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang, T.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, S. J.-H. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185–200.Google Scholar
  46. Yannakakis, G. N., & Hallam, J. (2009). Real-time game adaptation for optimizing player satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 1(2), 121–133. Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Information Technologies InstituteITI-CERTHThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations