The study systematically reviewed 70 empirical studies on technology-supported peer assessment published in seven critical journals from 2007 to 2016. Several dimensions of the technology-supported peer-assessment studies were investigated, including the adopted technologies, learning environments, application domains, peer-assessment mode, and the research issues. It was found that, in the 10 years, there was a slight change in peer-assessment studies in terms of the adopted technologies, which were mostly traditional computers. In terms of learning environments, in the first 5 years, most activities were conducted online after class, while in the second 5 years, more activities were conducted in the classroom during school hours. Moreover, several researchers have started to consider peer assessment as a frequently adopted teaching strategy and have tried to integrate other learning strategies into peer-assessment activities to strengthen their effectiveness. In the meantime, it was found that little research engaged students in developing peer-assessment rubrics; that is, most of the studies employed rubrics developed by teachers. In terms of research issues, developing students’ higher-order thinking received the most attention. For future studies, it is suggested that researchers can explore the value and effects of adopting emerging technologies (e.g., mobile devices) in peer assessment as well as engaging students in the development of peer-assessment rubrics, which might enable them to deeply experience the tacit knowledge underlying the standard rubrics provided by the teacher.
Applications in subject areas Interactive learning environments Pedagogical issues Teaching/learning strategies
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study is supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under contract numbers MOST-105-2511-S-011 -008 -MY3 and MOST 106-2511-S-011 -005 -MY3.
Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing,5(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2016). Learners’ interpersonal beliefs and generated feedback in an online role-playing peer-feedback activity: An exploratory study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,17(2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition,24(4), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016a). A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology,47(4), 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, T. C. (2016). Effects of a peer assessment system based on a grid-based knowledge classification approach on computer skills training. Educational Technology & Society,19(4), 100–111.Google Scholar
Kao, G. Y. M., Lin, S. S. J., & Sun, C. T. (2008). Beyond sharing: Engaging students in cooperative and competitive active. Educational Technology & Society,11(3), 82–96.Google Scholar
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation,8(3), 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Steckelberg, A. L., & Srinivasan, S. (2008). Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a computer-assisted peer assessment system. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology,34(2), 133–148.Google Scholar
Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the Technology-Enhanced Learning Model. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462.Google Scholar
Wang, H. Y., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Integrating socio-cultural contexts and location-based systems for ubiquitous language learning in museums: A state of the art review of 2009–2014. British Journal of Educational Technology,48(2), 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar