Can Computers Teach Social Skills to Children? Examining the Efficacy of “The Social Express” in an African-American Sample
- 4 Downloads
This study examined the efficacy of a computer-based social skills training program, The Social Express. Independent researchers evaluated the program at both a school-wide level (Tier 1) and at a referred group level (Tier 2). The sample included third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade students in a Title 1 public school with a 100% African-American population. At the Tier 1 level, pre-post (immediate) comparisons on a social skills rating scale indicated statistically significant differences by group at the α = .10 level (p = 0.058). A significant Tier 1 quadratic effect for time (pre-test, post-test (immediate), post-test [delayed]) was found (p = 0.029) as well. At the Tier 2 level, pre-post comparisons indicated no statistically significant group improvement. Pre-post comparisons at the individual level found that about 39% of the children had statistically significant improvement in social skills, with 9% indicating a decrease in problem behaviors.
KeywordsTechnology Social-emotional learning Social skills training School-based interventions Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)
This study was funded by a material grant from The Social Express. The grant consisted of the option to use (free of charge) the software program in one, Title-1 elementary school for 2 years. No funds were provided. No requirements were placed on the researchers other than the software be used as part of a research project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
IRB approval was granted for both Troy University and Florida State University for this project.
All children had access to the software programs. Parents provided written informed consent for researchers to be able to use their child’s/children’s data in this study.
- Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychology testing. Upper Riverside: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bradshaw, C. P., Koth, C. W., Bevans, K. B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brooks, A., Todd, A. W., Tofflemoyer, S., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Use of functional assessment and a self-management system to increase academic engagement and work completion. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007030050030301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chafouleas, S., Rile-Tillman, C., Sassu, K., LaFrance, M., & Patwa, S. (2007). Daily behavior report cards: an investigation of the consistency of on-task data across raters and methods. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090010401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cobb, A. (2010). To differentiate or not to differentiate? Using internet-based technology in the classroom. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(1), 37–45.Google Scholar
- Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2005). Social responsiveness scale, second edition (SRS-2). Torrance: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Crooke, P. J., Hendrix, R. E., & Rachman, J. Y. (2008). Brief report: measuring the effectiveness of teaching social thinking to children with Asperger syndrome (AS) and high functioning autism (HFA). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0466-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crooke, P. J., & Winner, M. G. (2015). Research to frameworks to practice: social thinking’s layers of evidence. Santa Clara: Thinking Social.Google Scholar
- District Administration (2013). Readers’ choice top 100 products for 2013. District Administration Magazine. http://www.districtadministration.com/top-100-winners-2013?keys&items_per_page=10&page=1
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gresham, F., & Elliot, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system (SSIS) rating scales. San Antonio: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Koning, C., Magill-Evans, J., Volden, J., & Dick, B. (2013). Efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy-based social skills intervention for school-aged boys with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 7, 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, R. M. (2015). Group social skills interventions for children with Asperger’s: the effects of parent-guided social skills software. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3722
- Krach, S. K., & McCreery, M. P. (2016). Technology and positive behavioral support: Evaluation, selection, and implementation of computer-based socio-emotional training in schools. In S. Y. Tettegah & D. Espelage (Eds.), Emotions and technology: Communication of feelings for, with, and through digital media – Volume I: Emotions, learning, and technology (pp. 159–174). Waltham: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Krach, S. K., McCreery, M. P., Wang, Y., Mohammadiamin, H., & Cirks, C. K. (2016). Diagnostic utility of the social skills improvement system performance screening guide (SSIS-PSG). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916636500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: a step-by-step approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., & Menzies, H. M. (2014). Comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention: why does my school - and district - need an integrated approach to meet a students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.893977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, K. Y., Crooke, P. J., Lui, A. L., Kan, P. P., Mark, Y. M., van Hasselt, C. A., & Tong, M. C. (2015). The outcome of a social cognitive training for mainstream adolescents with social communication deficits in a Chinese community. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1065960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, K. Y. S., Lui, A. S. Y., Kan, P. P. K., Luke, K. L., Mak, Y. M., Cheung, P. M., Cheng, L., & Wong, I. (2009). A case series on the social thinking training of mainstreamed secondary school students with high-functioning autism. Hong Kong Journal of Mental Health, 35, 10–17.Google Scholar
- Metcalf, T. (2015). What’s your plan? Accurate decision making within a multi-tier system of supports: critical areas in tier 2. New York: RTI Action Network, A Program of the National Center for Learning Disabilities Retrieved from https://www.cnyric.org/tfiles/folder1306/Tier%202%20What's%20Your%20Plan.pdf.Google Scholar
- Myles, B., Jones-Bock, S., & Simpson, R. (2001). Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS). North Tonawanda: Multi-health systems (MHS).Google Scholar
- Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education Retrieved from http://ncer.ed.gov.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramdoss, S., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Mulloy, A., Lang, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2012). Computer-based interventions to improve social and emotional skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2011.651655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott, T. M., McIntyre, J., Liaupsin, C., Nelson, C. M., Conroy, M., & Payne, L. (2005). An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007050070040201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shukla-Mehta, S., Miller, T., & Callahan, K. J. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of video instruction on social and communication skills training for children with autism spectrum disorders: a review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357609352901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sugai, G., & Horner, R. R. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.Google Scholar
- Sugai, G., & Simonsen, B. (2012). Positive behavioral interventions and supports: history, defining features, and misconceptions. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Center for PBIS & Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Retrieved from http://idahotc.com/Portals/6/Docs/2015/Tier_1/articles/PBIS_history.features.misconceptions.pdf.Google Scholar
- The Language Express. (2013). The social express teaching manual (1st ed.). San Diego: Author.Google Scholar
- Winner, M. G. (2005). Think social! A social thinking curriculum for school-age students. San Jose: Think Social Publishing, Incorporated.Google Scholar
- Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2009). Social thinking: a training paradigm for professionals and treatment approach for individuals with social learning/social pragmatic challenges. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 16(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1044/lle16.2.62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar